We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, In PEP 526, there is a section called "Runtime Effects of Type Annotations" which has the following code:
from typing import Dict class Player: ... players: Dict[str, Player] __points: int print(__annotations__) # prints: {'players': typing.Dict[str, __main__.Player], # '_Player__points': <class 'int'>}
The code and the output don't match. Name mangling only happens inside the body of the class not module. So the correct output would be:
{'players': typing.Dict[str, __main__.Player], '__points': <class 'int'>}
If we want to see the effect of name mangling we could have something like:
from typing import Dict class Player: __points: int players: Dict[str, Player] print(__annotations__) print(Player.__annotations__)
Or have the print(__annotations__) inside the class:
print(__annotations__)
from typing import Dict class Player: __points: int print(__annotations__) players: Dict[str, Player] print(__annotations__)
That would be a quick fix if you confirm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not the expert here, but if I were to guess, perhaps something like the latter was intended and the indent was just not preserved correctly.
@JelleZijlstra ?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
In PEP 526, there is a section called "Runtime Effects of Type Annotations" which has the following code:
The code and the output don't match.
Name mangling only happens inside the body of the class not module. So the correct output would be:
If we want to see the effect of name mangling we could have something like:
Or have the
print(__annotations__)
inside the class:That would be a quick fix if you confirm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: