Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What if we could generate two datasets with same reads, one with good quality and one with bad quality? #11

Open
ginnamon opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ginnamon
Copy link

ginnamon commented May 8, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In order to evaluate my error correction tool, I though to build a confusion matrix by filtering one dataset containing bad reads and use as reference one dataset containing the corrected version of the first one reads.

Describe the solution you'd like
I tried to generate two datasets using the same parameters as input (also, the seed in fixed in order to maintain a deterministic generation of sequences) but with quality and glitches values differents. The result is two different collections of reads, coming from different locations of the reference genome.

Describe alternatives you've considered
What I need are two datasets with the same reads, one with perfect quality and one with glitches and errors. In this way, I could compare the perfect dataset with the one corrected by my tool and creating the confusion matrix.

Additional context
I'm honestly not sure if this is already possible, but I have not been able to find the solution to my problem in the documentation or on the internet.

@ginnamon ginnamon added the enhancement New feature or request label May 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant