Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question about the Licenese #12

Open
DavidPesta opened this issue May 31, 2014 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #28
Open

Question about the Licenese #12

DavidPesta opened this issue May 31, 2014 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #28

Comments

@DavidPesta
Copy link

The README states: "Finch is available for sue under the MIT License"

But what if my name isn't Sue? What if my name is David? Does the MIT License still apply to me?

Also, Licenese spelling adjustment is needed. :)

Love your library by the way! Except for the CoffeeScript documentation of course. Plain vanilla would be good to have.
@stoodder
Copy link
Owner

Hey David, I agree with you on the docs, vanilla JS is definitely in order (as well as new docs for that matter). Thanks for the critiques on the license/verbiage, will fix stat.

@ryanzec
Copy link

ryanzec commented Nov 20, 2014

+1 for vanilla JS docs

@joscha joscha linked a pull request Dec 23, 2015 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fix: typo joscha/finchjs
3 participants
@stoodder @ryanzec @DavidPesta