We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For several values of 'Foo':
the spec uses both the phrase "Foo exotic object" and "Foo object", presumably as synonyms. It might be good to settle on a single form.
(Note that it also uses "Function object" and "Function exotic object", but not as synonyms.)
(Follow-up to #1460 (comment))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(Or if we don't settle on a single form, both forms should link to the same definition.)
Sorry, something went wrong.
I would indeed expect "exotic" to always be present in usage, or only be present in definition.
Conclusion from the call: the word "exotic" should decorate all instances of describing exotic objects.
No branches or pull requests
For several values of 'Foo':
the spec uses both the phrase "Foo exotic object" and "Foo object", presumably as synonyms. It might be good to settle on a single form.
(Note that it also uses "Function object" and "Function exotic object", but not as synonyms.)
(Follow-up to #1460 (comment))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: