We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unexpected error
Background worker
Regular messages:
main [2654342.733071] postgresql[17256]: 2025-03-12 04:30:36.168 UTC [17256] ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "bgw_job_stat_history_pkey" main [2654342.735028] postgresql[17256]: 2025-03-12 04:30:36.168 UTC [17256] DETAIL: Key (id)=(11258512) already exists. main [2654342.742490] postgresql[161]: 2025-03-12 04:30:36.179 UTC [161] LOG: background worker "TimescaleDB Background Worker Scheduler" (PID 17256) exited with exit code 1
Background jobs stop running until restart of postgresql, eventually problem returns.
2.18.2
14.15
Debian
Source
Other
That I am not sure, we have seen this on every system since upgrading. Our systems are armv7's if thats relevant.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Might be related to the duplicate job issue: #7281
Sorry, something went wrong.
@akuzm potentially.
Our previous timescaledb version was 2.9.3 which did not experience it. Unfortunately thats a large bisection.
No branches or pull requests
What type of bug is this?
Unexpected error
What subsystems and features are affected?
Background worker
What happened?
Regular messages:
Background jobs stop running until restart of postgresql, eventually problem returns.
TimescaleDB version affected
2.18.2
PostgreSQL version used
14.15
What operating system did you use?
Debian
What installation method did you use?
Source
What platform did you run on?
Other
Relevant log output and stack trace
How can we reproduce the bug?
That I am not sure, we have seen this on every system since upgrading. Our systems are armv7's if thats relevant.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: