aio_wait_kick: add missing memory barrier

It seems that aio_wait_kick always required a memory barrier
or atomic operation in the caller, but nobody actually
took care of doing it.

Let's put the barrier in the function instead, and pair it
with another one in AIO_WAIT_WHILE. Read aio_wait_kick()
comment for further explanation.

Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>

Author: esposem

include/block/aio-wait.h

@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ extern AioWait global_aio_wait;
     AioContext *ctx_ = (ctx);                                      \
     /* Increment wait_->num_waiters before evaluating cond. */     \
     qatomic_inc(&wait_->num_waiters);                              \
+    /* Paired with smp_mb in aio_wait_kick(). */                   \
+    smp_mb();                                                      \
     if (ctx_ && in_aio_context_home_thread(ctx_)) {                \
         while ((cond)) {                                           \
             aio_poll(ctx_, true);                                  \

util/aio-wait.c

@@ -35,7 +35,21 @@ static void dummy_bh_cb(void *opaque)
 
 void aio_wait_kick(void)
 {
-    /* The barrier (or an atomic op) is in the caller.  */
+    /*
+     * Paired with smp_mb in AIO_WAIT_WHILE. Here we have:
+     * write(condition);
+     * aio_wait_kick() {
+     *      smp_mb();
+     *      read(num_waiters);
+     * }
+     *
+     * And in AIO_WAIT_WHILE:
+     * write(num_waiters);
+     * smp_mb();
+     * read(condition);
+     */
+    smp_mb();
+
     if (qatomic_read(&global_aio_wait.num_waiters)) {
         aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(qemu_get_aio_context(), dummy_bh_cb, NULL);
     }