You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For Radarsat-2 I used the same function than Sentinel-1 to load heading angle (load_ground_heading).
When we compare the results between data already computed on Cyclobs (netcdf files) and data computed by the load_ground_heading function, we notice that values are the same on average.
A first problem is that the range of values is bigger on Cyclobs ground heading than on xsar one (it means that the calculation method isn't the same.
Also, xsar ground heading is rotated; is it the result of a convention?
Here are some comparisons to illustrate the problem :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For Radarsat-2 I used the same function than Sentinel-1 to load heading angle (
load_ground_heading
).When we compare the results between data already computed on Cyclobs (netcdf files) and data computed by the
load_ground_heading
function, we notice that values are the same on average.Here are some comparisons to illustrate the problem :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: