Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cover triple terms in definition of RDFterm-equal #182

Open
hartig opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Cover triple terms in definition of RDFterm-equal #182

hartig opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial

Comments

@hartig
Copy link
Contributor

hartig commented Jan 22, 2025

By the current definition of RDFterm-equal, comparing two triple terms based on this function (i.e., using the = operator) always returns false, even if the two triple terms are the same.

The definition needs to be extended to consider triple terms in the second list of bullet points (the one that specifies what it means for two RDF terms to be equal).
@hartig
Copy link
Contributor Author

hartig commented Jan 22, 2025

Related to this issue, see Section 4.4.9 of the CG report.

@hartig hartig mentioned this issue Jan 23, 2025
Open
5 tasks
@hartig hartig mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2025
Closed
@pfps pfps added the spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial label Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hartig @pfps