Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: separate filter on groups? #57

Open
iherman opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Feature request: separate filter on groups? #57

iherman opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement Something could be improved (as opposed to “doesn't work as it should”) mock-up-1 About our first iteration (released ~ 20 Mar 2018)

Comments

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Mar 21, 2018

I would expect many people may want to look for specifications and document published by a specific group. (I know I would use that.). Would that be possible to add yet another dimension to the search listing the WGs or IGs?

@tripu tripu added mock-up-1 About our first iteration (released ~ 20 Mar 2018) enhancement Something could be improved (as opposed to “doesn't work as it should”) labels Mar 22, 2018
@ylafon
Copy link
Member

ylafon commented Apr 10, 2018

Also, in the current view, the name of the WG is not clickable, it could become clickable with a link to this filtered view (by [WBI]G).

@wseltzer
Copy link
Member

wseltzer commented Jun 7, 2018

Yes, was looking for this feature today.

@tripu
Copy link
Member

tripu commented Nov 13, 2018

“Also, in the current view, the name of the WG is not clickable, it could become clickable with a link to this filtered view (by [WBI]G).”

(If/when such a filter exists) the “clickable” part should be addressed by #18.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Something could be improved (as opposed to “doesn't work as it should”) mock-up-1 About our first iteration (released ~ 20 Mar 2018)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants