Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
169 lines (151 loc) · 13.3 KB

File metadata and controls

169 lines (151 loc) · 13.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for alibaba/tengine

Objective: Compromise Application using Tengine Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Paths & Critical Nodes)

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Tengine [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[AND] Exploit Tengine Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] 1. Exploit Code Vulnerabilities in Tengine [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[OR] 1.1 Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.1.1 Buffer Overflow [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.1.1.1 Identify Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in Tengine Code (e.g., Request Parsing, Module Handling)
│   │   │   │   │   ├─── Impact: High [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   │   └───[AND] 1.1.1.2 Trigger Buffer Overflow via Crafted Request [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: High [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.1.2 Use-After-Free Vulnerability [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.1.2.1 Identify Use-After-Free Vulnerability in Tengine Code (e.g., Object Handling, Connection Management)
│   │   │   │   │   ├─── Impact: High [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   │   └───[AND] 1.1.2.2 Trigger Use-After-Free via Specific Request Sequence [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: High [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.1.3 Integer Overflow/Underflow [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.1.3.2 Trigger Overflow/Underflow via Large/Small Input Values [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: Medium to High
│   │   ├───[OR] 1.2 Logic Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.2.1 Configuration Parsing Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.2.1.2 Exploit Parsing Vulnerability to Inject Malicious Configuration or Bypass Security Checks [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: Medium to High
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.2.2 Request Handling Logic Errors [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.2.2.2 Exploit Logic Error to Bypass Access Controls or Gain Unauthorized Access [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: Medium to High
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.2.3 Vulnerabilities in Tengine Specific Modules (e.g., Dynamic Modules, Custom Modules) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 1.2.3.2 Trigger Module Vulnerability via Module-Specific Request or Configuration [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: Medium to High
│   │   ├───[OR] 2. Exploit Configuration Weaknesses in Tengine Deployment [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 2.2 Misconfiguration by Administrator [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 2.2.1 Identify Misconfiguration in Tengine Setup (e.g., Incorrect Access Control Rules, Exposed Admin Interfaces, Weak TLS/SSL Configuration)
│   │   │   │   │   ├─── Impact: Medium to High [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   │   └───[AND] 2.2.2 Exploit Misconfiguration to Gain Unauthorized Access or Compromise Security [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: Medium to High [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] 2.3 Vulnerable Third-Party Modules/Dependencies [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├───[AND] 2.3.2 Exploit Vulnerability in Third-Party Component to Compromise Tengine [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │       ├─── Impact: Medium to High
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities within Tengine's codebase itself.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High (depending on vulnerability type and Tengine version).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Remote Code Execution, Service Compromise, Data Breach).
  • Effort: Medium to High (depending on vulnerability type and complexity).
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Expert (depending on vulnerability type and exploitation technique).
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Very Hard (depending on vulnerability type and exploit method).
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Implement secure coding practices during Tengine development or when creating custom modules.

    • Conduct regular code reviews and security audits of Tengine codebase and modules.

    • Utilize static and dynamic analysis tools to identify potential code vulnerabilities.

    • Establish a vulnerability disclosure and patching process for Tengine.

    • 1.1 Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting memory corruption bugs like Buffer Overflow, Use-After-Free, and Integer Overflow/Underflow.
      • Likelihood: Medium (for mature software, but still possible).
      • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Service Compromise).
      • Effort: Medium to High (depending on vulnerability type).
      • Skill Level: Intermediate to Expert (depending on vulnerability type).
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard to Very Hard (subtle memory errors).
      • Actionable Insights:
        • Fuzz Tengine extensively with various inputs to uncover memory corruption vulnerabilities.

        • Utilize memory sanitizers (AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during testing.

        • Review code for memory management issues and integer operations.

        • 1.1.1 Buffer Overflow [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Overwriting memory buffers by sending oversized inputs, leading to control-flow hijacking.
          • Likelihood: Medium.
          • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Service Compromise).
          • Effort: Medium to Low (once vulnerability is identified, exploitation can be easy).
          • Skill Level: Intermediate to Beginner (for exploitation).
          • Detection Difficulty: Hard to Medium.
          • Actionable Insights: Fuzz Tengine with long headers, URLs, and POST data. Analyze crash dumps.
        • 1.1.2 Use-After-Free Vulnerability [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Exploiting memory that is freed but still referenced, leading to unpredictable behavior and potential RCE.
          • Likelihood: Medium.
          • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Service Instability).
          • Effort: High to Medium (exploitation can be complex).
          • Skill Level: Advanced to Intermediate (for exploitation).
          • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard to Hard.
          • Actionable Insights: Analyze Tengine source code for memory management issues. Use static and dynamic analysis tools.
        • 1.1.3 Integer Overflow/Underflow [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Causing integer overflows or underflows in size or length calculations, potentially leading to buffer overflows or other issues.
          • Likelihood: Medium.
          • Impact: Medium to High (Buffer overflows, incorrect behavior, potential RCE).
          • Effort: Medium to Low (once vulnerability is identified, exploitation can be easy).
          • Skill Level: Intermediate to Beginner (for exploitation).
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium.
          • Actionable Insights: Review Tengine code for integer operations related to size and length. Test with extreme input values.
    • 1.2 Logic Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting flaws in the design or implementation logic of Tengine, leading to security bypasses or unauthorized access.
      • Likelihood: Medium.
      • Impact: Medium to High (Security bypass, unauthorized access, information disclosure).
      • Effort: Medium.
      • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (depending on vulnerability type).
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (depending on vulnerability type).
      • Actionable Insights:
        • Thoroughly test Tengine's configuration parsing and request handling logic.

        • Focus security testing on Tengine specific modules, especially custom ones.

        • Conduct penetration testing to identify logic flaws.

        • 1.2.1 Configuration Parsing Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how Tengine parses its configuration files to inject malicious configurations or bypass security checks.
          • Likelihood: Low to Medium.
          • Impact: Medium to High (Configuration injection, security bypass).
          • Effort: Medium.
          • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced.
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard.
          • Actionable Insights: Analyze Tengine configuration parsing logic. Test with unusual characters and directive combinations.
        • 1.2.2 Request Handling Logic Errors [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Exploiting logic errors in how Tengine processes HTTP requests, leading to path traversal, access control bypasses, or other vulnerabilities.
          • Likelihood: Medium.
          • Impact: Medium to High (Access control bypass, unauthorized access).
          • Effort: Low to Medium.
          • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate.
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium.
          • Actionable Insights: Test Tengine's request handling with various URL encodings, path traversal sequences, and edge cases.
        • 1.2.3 Vulnerabilities in Tengine Specific Modules (e.g., Dynamic Modules, Custom Modules) [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities within Tengine's modules, especially custom or less-tested modules.
          • Likelihood: Medium to High (modules might have less rigorous testing).
          • Impact: Medium to High (Module-specific vulnerabilities can range from DoS to RCE).
          • Effort: Medium to High (depending on module complexity).
          • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced.
          • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard.
          • Actionable Insights: Focus security testing on enabled Tengine modules. Review module code for vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting weaknesses arising from insecure configuration of Tengine in a deployed environment.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High (due to potential for human error and insecure defaults).
  • Impact: Medium to High (Security compromise, unauthorized access, data breach).
  • Effort: Low to Medium (depending on the misconfiguration).
  • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate (for exploiting common misconfigurations).
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (for common misconfigurations).
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Harden Tengine default configuration before deployment.

    • Implement configuration management and validation processes.

    • Regularly audit Tengine configuration for security weaknesses.

    • Use security scanning tools to detect misconfigurations.

    • 2.2 Misconfiguration by Administrator [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting common misconfigurations introduced by administrators, such as incorrect access control rules, exposed admin interfaces, or weak TLS/SSL settings.
      • Likelihood: Medium to High (human error is common).
      • Impact: Medium to High (Access control bypass, security compromise).
      • Effort: Low to Medium.
      • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate.
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium.
      • Actionable Insights: Implement configuration management and validation processes. Regularly audit Tengine configuration.
    • 2.3 Vulnerable Third-Party Modules/Dependencies [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in third-party modules or libraries used by Tengine.
      • Likelihood: Medium (third-party components can have vulnerabilities).
      • Impact: Medium to High (Vulnerability impact depends on the component).
      • Effort: Low to Medium (using vulnerability scanners).
      • Skill Level: Beginner to Advanced (depending on the vulnerability and exploit).
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium (for known vulnerabilities).
      • Actionable Insights: Maintain an inventory of Tengine modules and dependencies. Regularly update and patch third-party components.