Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
139 lines (110 loc) · 10.4 KB

File metadata and controls

139 lines (110 loc) · 10.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for alibaba/tengine

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous Module Auditing

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous Module Auditing

  • Description:

    1. Inventory: Create a comprehensive list of all Tengine modules used, including version numbers and source (official, third-party, custom).
    2. Source Code Review: For each Tengine module, obtain the source code. A dedicated security team or experienced developers familiar with C/C++ and web server security should perform a manual code review. Focus on:
      • Input Validation: Ensure all inputs from requests (headers, body, URI) processed by the module are properly validated and sanitized.
      • Memory Management: Check for potential buffer overflows, use-after-free errors, and memory leaks within the module's code. Look for unsafe functions like strcpy, strcat, sprintf (without proper bounds checking).
      • Error Handling: Verify that errors within the module are handled gracefully and do not reveal sensitive information or lead to unexpected states.
      • Authentication/Authorization: If the module handles authentication or authorization, ensure it follows secure practices and avoids common vulnerabilities (e.g., weak cryptography, improper session management).
    3. Static Analysis: Use automated static analysis tools (e.g., Clang Static Analyzer, Coverity, SonarQube) to scan the module source code for potential vulnerabilities. Configure the tools with rules specific to C/C++ and web server security. Address all reported issues.
    4. Dynamic Analysis (Fuzzing): Employ fuzzing tools (e.g., AFL++, libFuzzer) to send malformed or unexpected inputs to the module and observe its behavior. This helps identify vulnerabilities that might be missed by static analysis or manual code review. Create custom fuzzing harnesses that target the module's specific API and input handling.
    5. Documentation: Document all findings, including identified vulnerabilities, remediation steps, and any remaining risks related to each module.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Buffer Overflows (Severity: Critical): Exploitable buffer overflows within a Tengine module can lead to arbitrary code execution.
    • Logic Errors (Severity: High to Critical): Flaws in the module's logic can lead to unexpected behavior, bypass of security controls, or denial-of-service.
    • Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium to High): Modules might inadvertently leak sensitive information.
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Vulnerabilities in modules can be exploited to cause Tengine to crash.
    • Improper Handling of HTTP Requests (Severity: High): Vulnerabilities in modules can lead to incorrect processing of HTTP requests.
  • Impact:

    • Buffer Overflows: Risk reduction: High (if vulnerabilities are found and fixed).
    • Logic Errors: Risk reduction: Medium to High (depending on the nature of the errors).
    • Information Disclosure: Risk reduction: Medium.
    • Denial-of-Service: Risk reduction: Medium to High.
    • Improper Handling of HTTP Requests: Risk reduction: High.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic static analysis is performed on custom modules using SonarQube.
    • No fuzzing is currently implemented.
    • No formal code review process is in place for third-party modules.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive code reviews for all modules (especially third-party).
    • Dynamic analysis (fuzzing) for all modules.
    • Formal documentation of the auditing process and findings.

Mitigation Strategy: Module Minimization

Mitigation Strategy: Module Minimization

  • Description:

    1. Identify Essential Modules: Analyze the application's functionality and determine the absolute minimum set of Tengine modules required.
    2. Disable Unnecessary Modules: In the Tengine configuration (nginx.conf), comment out or remove the directives that load any modules not identified as essential.
    3. Rebuild (if necessary): If Tengine was compiled with statically linked modules, you may need to recompile Tengine with only the required modules enabled. This provides the strongest form of minimization.
    4. Regular Review: Periodically (e.g., every 3-6 months) review the enabled modules and re-evaluate their necessity.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • All vulnerabilities in disabled modules (Severity: Varies): By disabling a Tengine module, you completely eliminate the risk of any vulnerabilities within that module being exploited.
    • Reduced Attack Surface (Severity: General improvement): Minimizing the number of modules reduces the overall attack surface.
  • Impact:

    • All vulnerabilities in disabled modules: Risk reduction: Complete (for those specific modules).
    • Reduced Attack Surface: Risk reduction: Medium (general improvement in security posture).
  • Currently Implemented:

    • A basic list of required modules was created during initial setup.
    • Unused modules were commented out in the nginx.conf file.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Regular, scheduled reviews of enabled modules.
    • Consideration of recompiling Tengine with only essential modules (for statically linked builds).

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Hardening (Tengine-Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Review Official Documentation: Thoroughly review the official Tengine documentation for all configuration directives used. Pay special attention to security-related directives and Tengine-specific options.
    2. Least Privilege: Ensure Tengine runs as a non-root user with minimal permissions.
    3. Disable Unnecessary Features: Disable any Tengine features or options that are not required (e.g., specific HTTP methods, server tokens).
    4. Request Limits: Configure limits on request size, body size, number of connections, and request rate using Tengine's limit_req and limit_conn modules (or equivalent Tengine-specific features).
    5. Timeouts: Set appropriate timeouts for client connections, request processing, and upstream server communication using Tengine's configuration options.
    6. Header Handling: Configure Tengine to properly handle HTTP headers, including security-related headers (HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, CSP, X-XSS-Protection).
    7. Error Pages: Customize error pages served by Tengine to avoid revealing sensitive information.
    8. Regular Audits: Periodically review the Tengine configuration.
    9. Version Control: Use Git to manage Tengine configuration.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Request limits and timeouts configured within Tengine help prevent attacks.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: High): CSP and X-XSS-Protection headers set via Tengine help mitigate XSS.
    • Clickjacking (Severity: Medium): The X-Frame-Options header set via Tengine prevents clickjacking.
    • MIME-Sniffing (Severity: Medium): The X-Content-Type-Options header set via Tengine prevents MIME-sniffing.
    • Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium): Custom error pages and disabling server tokens in Tengine prevent information leakage.
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Severity: High): HSTS configured in Tengine helps prevent MitM attacks.
    • Configuration Errors (Severity: High): Incorrect Tengine configuration can lead to vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:

    • Denial-of-Service: Risk reduction: Medium to High.
    • Cross-Site Scripting: Risk reduction: Medium to High.
    • Clickjacking: Risk reduction: High.
    • MIME-Sniffing: Risk reduction: High.
    • Information Disclosure: Risk reduction: Medium.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Risk reduction: High.
    • Configuration Errors: Risk reduction: High.
  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic request limits are configured.
    • HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection headers are set.
    • Tengine runs as a non-root user.
    • Configuration is stored in Git.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Regular, scheduled configuration audits.
    • Custom error pages are not fully implemented.
    • Fine-tuning of request limits and timeouts based on load testing.
    • Implementation of CSP.

Mitigation Strategy: Stay Updated (Tengine-Specific Patches)

  • Description:

    1. Monitor Tengine Sources: Actively monitor the official Tengine GitHub repository, mailing lists, and any other official communication channels for security advisories and patch announcements specific to Tengine.
    2. Establish Patching Process: Create a documented process for applying Tengine-specific security updates. This should include:
      • Testing: Thoroughly test updates in a staging environment.
      • Rollback Plan: Have a plan to roll back to the previous Tengine version.
      • Downtime Minimization: Plan updates to minimize downtime.
    3. Automated Notifications: Set up automated notifications for new Tengine releases or security advisories.
  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Known Vulnerabilities in Tengine (Severity: Varies, potentially Critical): Applying Tengine-specific security patches addresses known vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:

    • Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High to Complete (for the specific vulnerabilities addressed by the patch).
  • Currently Implemented:

    • The team subscribes to the Tengine mailing list.
    • Updates are applied when they are noticed, but there is no formal process.
  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated notifications for new releases and security advisories.
    • Formal, documented patching process with testing and rollback procedures.
    • Dedicated staging environment for testing updates.