Attack Surface: Unpatched Software Vulnerabilities (CVEs)
- Description: Exploitation of known vulnerabilities (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) in the Apache httpd software or its modules.
- httpd Contribution: The vulnerability exists within the httpd codebase or a loaded module, making httpd the direct target.
- Example: An attacker exploits a known buffer overflow in an older version of
mod_ssl
to gain remote code execution on the httpd server. - Impact: Remote code execution, denial of service, privilege escalation (all directly impacting the httpd server).
- Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the specific CVE).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Patch Management: Implement a robust patch management process. Regularly check for and apply security updates from the Apache Software Foundation. Automate updates where possible. This is the primary defense.
- Vulnerability Scanning: Use vulnerability scanners to identify outdated or vulnerable versions of httpd and its modules.
- Minimal Installation: Install only the necessary modules to reduce the attack surface exposed by httpd.
Attack Surface: Misconfigured Modules (Specifically High-Impact Modules)
- Description: Improperly configured Apache modules, leading to significant security weaknesses directly exploitable through httpd. Focus here is on modules with a high potential for severe impact.
- httpd Contribution: The vulnerability arises from the configuration of a specific httpd module, and the exploitation occurs through httpd.
- Example:
mod_proxy
configured as an open proxy, allowing attackers to use the server for malicious purposes (SSRF, relaying attacks). This is a direct httpd configuration issue.mod_rewrite
rules that are too permissive, allowing attackers to access files outside the intended webroot (directory traversal) via crafted HTTP requests to httpd.mod_security
(if used) misconfigured to allow malicious requests that it should block.
- Impact: Unauthorized access, server-side request forgery (SSRF), denial of service, potential for remote code execution (depending on the module and misconfiguration).
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Principle of Least Privilege: Configure each module with the absolute minimum necessary permissions and features.
- Configuration Review: Thoroughly review and understand the security implications of every configuration directive for high-impact modules. Focus on modules that handle requests, proxies, or authentication.
- Testing: Extensively test module configurations, including negative testing (attempting to exploit potential misconfigurations).
- Documentation: Refer to the official Apache documentation for each module to understand secure configuration practices. Pay close attention to security warnings.
- Disable Unnecessary Modules: Disable all modules that are not strictly required. This is a crucial step to reduce httpd's attack surface.
Attack Surface: Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks (Targeting httpd Directly)
- Description: Attacks that aim to make the httpd server itself unavailable to legitimate users by exhausting its resources.
- httpd Contribution: httpd is the direct target of the DoS attack, and its configuration and resource limits determine its resilience.
- Example: A Slowloris attack targeting httpd, which keeps many connections open with slow data transfer, exhausting httpd's connection pool. A flood of HTTP requests overwhelming httpd's processing capacity.
- Impact: Service unavailability (of httpd), degraded performance.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Resource Limits: Configure appropriate limits within httpd on the number of concurrent connections, request sizes, and timeouts (e.g.,
MaxRequestWorkers
,Timeout
,KeepAliveTimeout
). These are httpd-specific settings. - Rate Limiting: Use httpd modules like
mod_qos
,mod_evasive
, ormod_security
to limit the rate of requests from individual clients or IP addresses. These modules operate within httpd. - Connection Management: Use httpd modules like
mod_reqtimeout
to mitigate slow-request attacks at the httpd level.
- Resource Limits: Configure appropriate limits within httpd on the number of concurrent connections, request sizes, and timeouts (e.g.,
Attack Surface: HTTP Request Smuggling/Splitting (Against httpd)
- Description: Exploiting inconsistencies in how HTTP requests are parsed by front-end proxies and the back-end Apache httpd server to bypass security controls or inject malicious content.
- httpd Contribution: httpd's request parsing logic is a key factor in the vulnerability; the attack is successful due to how httpd itself handles the crafted request.
- Example: An attacker crafts a request that is interpreted as two separate requests by the back-end httpd server, allowing them to access restricted resources or inject malicious content into a subsequent request handled by httpd.
- Impact: Bypassing security controls, unauthorized access, request forgery, cache poisoning (all directly affecting httpd's behavior).
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Consistent Configuration: Ensure that front-end proxies and Apache httpd are configured to handle HTTP requests in a consistent manner, particularly regarding
Transfer-Encoding
andContent-Length
headers. This includes httpd's configuration. - HTTP/2: Using HTTP/2 can help mitigate some request smuggling vulnerabilities, as it has stricter request parsing rules. This would involve configuring httpd for HTTP/2.
- Keep httpd Updated: Ensure httpd is updated to the latest version, as patches often address these types of vulnerabilities within httpd's parsing logic.
- Disable Unnecessary Features: If not using chunked encoding, consider disabling it within httpd's configuration.
- Consistent Configuration: Ensure that front-end proxies and Apache httpd are configured to handle HTTP requests in a consistent manner, particularly regarding