Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
201 lines (166 loc) · 16.1 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

201 lines (166 loc) · 16.1 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Skynet based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Skynet framework, focusing on its key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities, and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will consider the actor model, Lua scripting, C code, inter-node communication, data handling, and deployment environment. The primary goal is to improve Skynet's security posture, making it more resilient to attacks and protecting player data and game integrity.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the core Skynet framework as described in the provided GitHub repository (https://github.com/cloudwu/skynet) and the design document. This includes:
    • The C-based core engine.
    • The Lua scripting environment and its integration.
    • The actor model implementation.
    • Inter-node communication mechanisms (inferred from code and documentation).
    • Data persistence and handling (interaction with external databases).
    • The proposed Kubernetes deployment model.
    • The build process.
    • The gateway service.
  • Methodology:
    1. Architecture and Component Inference: Based on the provided documentation, code structure, and design review, we'll infer the detailed architecture, data flow, and interactions between components.
    2. Threat Modeling: For each identified component and interaction, we'll perform threat modeling using a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to identify potential vulnerabilities.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: We'll analyze the potential impact and likelihood of each identified threat, considering the business context and security requirements.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each significant vulnerability, we'll propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Skynet's architecture and implementation. These will be prioritized based on their impact and feasibility.

2. Security Implications of Key Components and Threat Modeling

We'll break down the security implications of each key component, performing threat modeling and vulnerability analysis.

  • 2.1 Gateway Service (C)

    • Function: Handles network connections, initial message routing, and potentially TLS termination.
    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could attempt to impersonate a legitimate client or another Skynet node.
      • Tampering: Messages could be intercepted and modified in transit.
      • Repudiation: Lack of logging or auditing could make it difficult to trace malicious actions.
      • Information Disclosure: Unencrypted communication could expose sensitive data. Vulnerabilities in the C code could lead to information leaks (e.g., buffer overflows).
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The gateway is a single point of entry and thus vulnerable to DoS attacks (e.g., SYN floods, connection exhaustion, malformed packets). Resource exhaustion within the gateway could impact the entire system.
      • Elevation of Privilege: A vulnerability in the gateway could allow an attacker to gain control of the entire Skynet node.
    • Vulnerability Analysis: The gateway is critical for security. Vulnerabilities here have a high impact. C code is prone to memory safety issues.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strong Authentication: Implement robust client authentication using unique identifiers and session tokens. Consider using a well-vetted library for this. Do not roll your own crypto.
      • TLS Encryption: Mandatory TLS 1.2 or 1.3 for all client connections. Use a robust certificate management system.
      • Input Validation: Strict input validation on all incoming data, including message size, format, and content. Use a whitelist approach whenever possible. Specifically check for buffer overflows, integer overflows, and format string vulnerabilities.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting per client IP address and/or user ID to mitigate DoS attacks.
      • Connection Limiting: Limit the maximum number of concurrent connections per client and globally.
      • Intrusion Detection/Prevention System (IDS/IPS): Deploy an IDS/IPS at the network level to detect and block malicious traffic.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of the gateway code.
      • Memory Safety: Explore using memory-safe languages or libraries if feasible. If staying with C, use tools like AddressSanitizer (ASan) and Valgrind during development and testing to detect memory errors.
      • Fuzzing: Use fuzzing techniques to test the gateway with a wide range of unexpected inputs.

  • 2.2 Service (Lua)

    • Function: Implements game logic using Lua scripts.
    • Threats:
      • Tampering: Malicious Lua scripts could be injected or modified.
      • Information Disclosure: Scripts could leak sensitive data if not properly sandboxed.
      • Denial of Service: Resource-intensive Lua scripts could consume excessive CPU or memory, leading to DoS.
      • Elevation of Privilege: A compromised Lua script could attempt to escape the sandbox and access the underlying C environment.
    • Vulnerability Analysis: Lua sandboxing is crucial. A compromised script could impact game integrity and potentially other services.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Lua Sandboxing: Use Skynet's built-in Lua sandboxing features aggressively. Disable unnecessary Lua modules and functions (e.g., os, io, debug). Review the available sandboxing options in the Skynet documentation and apply the most restrictive settings possible.
      • Input Validation (within Lua): Even within the sandbox, validate all input received by Lua scripts from other actors or the gateway.
      • Resource Limits: Enforce resource limits (CPU, memory) on Lua scripts to prevent DoS. Skynet likely has mechanisms for this; ensure they are used effectively.
      • Code Review: Thoroughly review all Lua scripts for security vulnerabilities before deployment.
      • Secure Script Management: Implement a secure mechanism for loading and updating Lua scripts. Sign scripts and verify their signatures before execution. Do not allow dynamic loading of scripts from untrusted sources.
      • Least Privilege: Grant Lua scripts only the minimum necessary permissions to interact with other actors and resources.

  • 2.3 Actor Model (C and Lua)

    • Function: Provides isolation and concurrency through message passing.
    • Threats:
      • Tampering: Messages between actors could be intercepted and modified.
      • Information Disclosure: Sensitive data passed in messages could be exposed.
      • Denial of Service: An actor could be flooded with messages, leading to resource exhaustion.
      • Deadlocks: Poorly designed message handling could lead to deadlocks, halting the system.
    • Vulnerability Analysis: The actor model provides inherent isolation, but vulnerabilities in message handling can still have significant consequences.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Message Serialization Security: Use a secure serialization format for messages. Avoid custom serialization schemes. Consider using well-vetted libraries like Protocol Buffers or FlatBuffers. Validate deserialized data thoroughly.
      • Message Authentication (Inter-node): If actors communicate across different Skynet nodes, authenticate messages to prevent spoofing and tampering. Use message signing or MACs (Message Authentication Codes).
      • Rate Limiting (per Actor): Implement rate limiting on a per-actor basis to prevent message flooding.
      • Deadlock Prevention: Carefully design message flows to avoid deadlocks. Use timeouts and error handling to recover from potential deadlocks.
      • Monitoring: Monitor actor message queues and resource usage to detect anomalies.

  • 2.4 Inter-node Communication (Inferred)

    • Function: Communication between different Skynet instances. (Mechanism needs clarification from the "Questions" section).
    • Threats: Similar to the Gateway, but specifically for node-to-node communication: Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service.
    • Vulnerability Analysis: Critical for distributed deployments. Vulnerabilities here could compromise the entire cluster.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Mutual TLS (mTLS): Use mTLS to authenticate and encrypt communication between Skynet nodes. Each node should have its own certificate.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate Skynet nodes on a separate network segment to limit the impact of a compromised node.
      • Firewall Rules: Strict firewall rules to allow only necessary communication between nodes.
      • Input Validation: Validate all data received from other nodes.

  • 2.5 Data Persistence (Database Interaction)

    • Function: Interaction with an external database (e.g., MongoDB, Redis).
    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks: SQL injection (if using a relational database) or NoSQL injection (if using a NoSQL database).
      • Data Breaches: Unauthorized access to the database.
      • Data Corruption: Malicious or accidental data modification.
    • Vulnerability Analysis: Database security is paramount. Vulnerabilities here can lead to data loss, corruption, and breaches.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Always use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent injection attacks. Never construct database queries by concatenating strings.
      • Database User Permissions: Use the principle of least privilege. Create separate database users with limited permissions for different Skynet services.
      • Database Security Best Practices: Follow security best practices for the chosen database system (e.g., enable authentication, encryption, auditing).
      • Regular Backups: Implement regular database backups and test the restoration process.
      • Input Validation (Before Database Interaction): Validate data before sending it to the database, even if using parameterized queries.

  • 2.6 Kubernetes Deployment

    • Function: Orchestration and management of Skynet containers.
    • Threats:
      • Compromised Container Images: Using vulnerable or malicious container images.
      • Misconfigured Kubernetes Resources: Incorrectly configured network policies, RBAC, or pod security policies.
      • Compromised Nodes: Attackers gaining access to Kubernetes worker nodes.
    • Vulnerability Analysis: Kubernetes security is complex. Misconfigurations can expose the entire system.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Image Scanning: Use a container image scanner (e.g., Trivy, Clair) to scan images for known vulnerabilities before deployment.
      • Kubernetes RBAC: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to restrict access to Kubernetes resources.
      • Network Policies: Use network policies to control traffic flow between pods and to external services.
      • Pod Security Policies (or Pod Security Admission): Enforce security policies on pods (e.g., prevent running as root, restrict access to host resources).
      • Node Security Hardening: Harden the underlying Kubernetes nodes (e.g., disable unnecessary services, enable security auditing).
      • Secrets Management: Use a secure secrets management solution (e.g., Kubernetes Secrets, HashiCorp Vault) to store sensitive data like database credentials. Never hardcode secrets in container images or configuration files.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the Kubernetes cluster.

  • 2.7 Build Process

    • Function: Compiling C code, packaging Lua scripts, and running tests.
    • Threats:
      • Compromised Build Server: Attackers gaining access to the build server.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Using vulnerable third-party libraries.
      • Insufficient Code Review: Merging malicious or vulnerable code.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Build Server: Harden the build server and restrict access.
      • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use an SCA tool to identify and track dependencies and their vulnerabilities.
      • Static Analysis: Integrate a static analysis tool (e.g., clang-tidy, Coverity) into the build process to detect code vulnerabilities.
      • Mandatory Code Review: Enforce mandatory code reviews for all code changes.
      • Reproducible Builds: Aim for reproducible builds to ensure that the same source code always produces the same binary.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Prioritized)

This is a summary of the most critical mitigation strategies, prioritized:

  1. Gateway Security:

    • Implement strong client authentication.
    • Mandatory TLS encryption.
    • Strict input validation (with fuzzing).
    • Rate and connection limiting.
    • IDS/IPS deployment.

  2. Lua Sandboxing:

    • Aggressively restrict Lua capabilities.
    • Enforce resource limits on Lua scripts.
    • Secure script management (signing and verification).

  3. Inter-node Communication Security (if applicable):

    • Mutual TLS (mTLS).
    • Network segmentation and firewall rules.

  4. Database Security:

    • Parameterized queries/prepared statements.
    • Principle of least privilege for database users.
    • Follow database security best practices.

  5. Kubernetes Security:

    • Image scanning.
    • RBAC, network policies, and pod security policies.
    • Secrets management.

  6. Build Process Security:

    • SCA for dependency management.
    • Static analysis.
    • Mandatory code review.

  7. Message Serialization Security

    • Use a secure serialization format.
    • Validate deserialized data.

  8. Message Authentication (Inter-node)

    • Use message signing or MACs.

  9. Rate Limiting (per Actor)

    • Implement rate limiting on a per-actor basis.

  10. Deadlock Prevention

    • Carefully design message flows.
    • Use timeouts and error handling.

  11. Monitoring

    • Monitor actor message queues and resource usage.

4. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

The following questions need to be answered to refine the security analysis:

  • Specific Database System: Knowing the specific database (MongoDB, Redis, etc.) allows for tailored security recommendations.
  • Expected Scale: The scale of deployment impacts the design of security measures (e.g., load balancing, DoS protection).
  • Existing Security Policies: Compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR, PCI DSS) may necessitate additional security controls.
  • Inter-node Communication Mechanism: Understanding the specific protocol and implementation is crucial for assessing its security.
  • Lua Script Management: How scripts are deployed and updated affects the security of the system.
  • Logging Requirements: Detailed logging is essential for auditing and incident response.
  • Configuration Management and Secrets: A secure mechanism for managing configuration and secrets is critical.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Skynet. By addressing the identified vulnerabilities and implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly improve the security posture of the framework, making it more robust and protecting player data and game integrity. The prioritized list of mitigations provides a roadmap for immediate action.