Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (45 loc) · 6.32 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (45 loc) · 6.32 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for espressif/esp-idf

Attack Surface: Wi-Fi Stack Buffer Overflow

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in the ESP-IDF's Wi-Fi stack (lwIP and Espressif's proprietary components) can lead to buffer overflows when processing malformed Wi-Fi packets.
  • ESP-IDF Contribution: ESP-IDF integrates and relies on the ESP-WIFI stack, making applications inherently vulnerable to bugs within this stack. The complexity of Wi-Fi protocols and their implementation in ESP-IDF increases the likelihood of such vulnerabilities.
  • Example: A specially crafted Wi-Fi management frame or data packet sent to an ESP-IDF device could trigger a buffer overflow in the Wi-Fi stack's parsing logic. This overflow could overwrite memory, potentially leading to code execution.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep ESP-IDF updated: Regularly update to the latest stable ESP-IDF version, as Espressif releases patches for known Wi-Fi stack vulnerabilities.
    • Disable unnecessary Wi-Fi features: If specific Wi-Fi features like Wi-Fi Direct or WPS are not required, disable them in the ESP-IDF configuration to reduce the attack surface.
    • Implement input validation: While harder for low-level stack interactions, consider any application-level input validation that might indirectly affect Wi-Fi stack behavior.
    • Network segmentation: Isolate ESP-IDF devices on separate network segments to limit the impact of a potential compromise.

Attack Surface: Bluetooth Stack Implementation Flaws

  • Description: Bugs in the ESP-IDF's Bluetooth stack (Classic or BLE) can lead to vulnerabilities during Bluetooth operations like pairing, connection establishment, or data exchange.
  • ESP-IDF Contribution: ESP-IDF provides the Bluetooth stack implementation. Vulnerabilities within this implementation directly expose applications using Bluetooth functionality.
  • Example: A vulnerability in the BLE pairing process could allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to a device. Another example could be a buffer overflow when handling long Bluetooth attribute values, leading to DoS or RCE.
  • Impact: Unauthorized Access, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service (DoS), Remote Code Execution (RCE).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep ESP-IDF updated: Regularly update ESP-IDF to benefit from Bluetooth stack security patches.
    • Use secure pairing methods: Utilize secure pairing methods like LE Secure Connections for BLE to mitigate man-in-the-middle attacks during pairing.
    • Implement proper Bluetooth role management: Carefully manage Bluetooth roles (central/peripheral, master/slave) and access control within the application.
    • Disable Bluetooth when not needed: If Bluetooth functionality is not always required, disable it when not in use to reduce the attack surface.

Attack Surface: Insecure Over-The-Air (OTA) Updates

  • Description: A poorly implemented OTA update mechanism can allow attackers to inject malicious firmware updates, compromising the device.
  • ESP-IDF Contribution: ESP-IDF provides OTA update libraries and examples, and the security of the OTA process heavily relies on how developers implement it using ESP-IDF features. If developers don't properly secure the OTA process using ESP-IDF tools, applications become vulnerable.
  • Example: An OTA update process that doesn't verify the firmware signature (using ESP-IDF secure boot features) or uses unencrypted communication channels (not leveraging ESP-IDF TLS capabilities) could be exploited by a man-in-the-middle attacker to replace legitimate firmware with malicious code.
  • Impact: Full Device Compromise, Malicious Firmware Installation, Data Theft, Denial of Service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement secure OTA: Use ESP-IDF's secure OTA features, including firmware signature verification (using secure boot if possible) and encrypted communication channels (HTTPS using mbedTLS integrated in ESP-IDF).
    • Use trusted update servers: Ensure OTA updates are downloaded from trusted and secure servers.
    • Rollback mechanism: Implement a rollback mechanism to revert to the previous firmware version in case of a failed or compromised update.
    • Mutual authentication: Consider mutual authentication between the device and the update server for enhanced security.

Attack Surface: FreeRTOS Kernel Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Vulnerabilities within the FreeRTOS kernel, such as race conditions, privilege escalation bugs, or memory management issues, can be exploited to compromise the system.
  • ESP-IDF Contribution: ESP-IDF relies on FreeRTOS as its real-time operating system. Any vulnerability in the included FreeRTOS version directly impacts ESP-IDF applications. ESP-IDF's build system and configuration directly include and utilize FreeRTOS.
  • Example: A race condition in FreeRTOS task scheduling could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to system resources or execute code in a privileged context. A memory corruption bug in the kernel could lead to system instability or RCE.
  • Impact: Privilege Escalation, Denial of Service (DoS), System Instability, Remote Code Execution (RCE).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep ESP-IDF updated: ESP-IDF updates often include updated FreeRTOS versions with security patches. Regularly update to benefit from these fixes.
    • Minimize custom FreeRTOS modifications: Avoid unnecessary modifications to the FreeRTOS kernel within ESP-IDF, as custom changes can introduce new vulnerabilities.
    • Static analysis and code review: Perform static analysis and code reviews of application code interacting with FreeRTOS APIs to identify potential race conditions or other concurrency issues.
    • Resource limits: Implement resource limits and watchdog timers to mitigate the impact of potential DoS attacks exploiting kernel vulnerabilities.