Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
47 lines (40 loc) · 4.68 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

47 lines (40 loc) · 4.68 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for facebook/zstd

Attack Surface: Malformed Compressed Data Handling

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from the zstd decompression algorithm's parsing of intentionally crafted or corrupted compressed data. Exploiting flaws in parsing logic can lead to memory corruption or denial of service.
  • Zstd Contribution: zstd library's core functionality is parsing and processing compressed data streams. Vulnerabilities in its parsing implementation are directly exploitable.
  • Example: A malicious actor provides a specially crafted .zst file. During decompression by zstd, a buffer overflow occurs due to incorrect parsing of a header field within the malformed data, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.
  • Impact:
    • Memory corruption
    • Denial of Service (DoS)
    • Arbitrary code execution
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Error Handling: Implement thorough error checking of zstd decompression function return codes. Handle errors gracefully and halt processing of potentially corrupted data.
    • Fuzzing: Utilize fuzzing techniques to rigorously test zstd decompression with a wide range of malformed inputs to proactively identify parsing vulnerabilities.
    • Regular Updates: Keep the zstd library updated to the latest stable version to benefit from crucial security patches and bug fixes addressing parsing vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Compression Bombs (Decompression Bombs)

  • Description: Exploiting the nature of the zstd compression algorithm to create a small compressed file that expands to an extremely large size upon decompression. This can overwhelm system resources and cause denial of service.
  • Zstd Contribution: As a compression algorithm, zstd is inherently susceptible to compression bomb attacks if decompression is not handled with resource awareness.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a tiny .zst file (e.g., a few kilobytes) that, when decompressed using zstd, expands to gigabytes or terabytes of data. An application attempting to decompress this without safeguards could exhaust memory or disk space, leading to a severe DoS.
  • Impact:
    • Memory Exhaustion
    • Disk Space Exhaustion
    • Denial of Service (DoS)
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Decompressed Size Limits: Implement strict limits on the maximum allowed decompressed size. Estimate potential decompressed size (if feasible) and reject decompression if it exceeds a safe threshold.
    • Resource Limits: Enforce resource limits (memory, CPU time, disk space) on the decompression process to prevent runaway resource consumption. Utilize OS-level limits or containerization.
    • Streaming Decompression: Employ zstd's streaming decompression APIs to process data in chunks, limiting memory usage and mitigating the impact of extreme decompression ratios.

Attack Surface: Memory Safety Vulnerabilities in Zstd Library Code

  • Description: Bugs within the zstd library's C code itself that could lead to memory corruption (buffer overflows, out-of-bounds access, etc.) during compression or decompression operations. These are vulnerabilities within the core zstd implementation.
  • Zstd Contribution: The inherent security of the zstd library's codebase is the direct contributor. Vulnerabilities in zstd's implementation directly translate to vulnerabilities in applications using it.
  • Example: A coding error in zstd's dictionary handling during decompression could cause a buffer overflow when processing specific compressed data, leading to memory corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution.
  • Impact:
    • Memory corruption
    • Denial of Service (DoS)
    • Arbitrary code execution
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Consistently update the zstd library to the latest stable version. Security patches and bug fixes are the primary defense against these vulnerabilities.
    • Security Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases related to zstd (e.g., GitHub security advisories, CVE databases) to stay informed about reported issues and apply updates promptly.
    • Code Auditing (Advanced): For extremely high-security requirements, consider performing independent code audits of the zstd library itself, although this is a resource-intensive and specialized task.