Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
86 lines (75 loc) · 7.85 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

86 lines (75 loc) · 7.85 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for madler/zlib

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Decompression Size Limits

  • Description:
    1. Identify Maximum Expected Size: Analyze your application's typical use cases to determine the maximum reasonable decompressed size for data you expect to process.
    2. Configure Decompression Library (if possible): Check if your chosen zlib binding or wrapper library provides options to set maximum output buffer sizes or limits on decompressed data. Utilize these configuration options if available.
    3. Implement Size Tracking: If direct library configuration is not available, implement a mechanism to track the decompressed size during the decompression process, for example by monitoring the output buffer or using zlib's avail_out parameter in inflate function calls.
    4. Enforce Limit and Error Handling: During decompression, check if the decompressed size exceeds the pre-defined maximum limit. If the limit is reached, immediately stop the decompression process and handle it as an error.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Buffer Overflow - Severity: High
    • Memory Corruption - Severity: High
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Memory Exhaustion - Severity: High
  • Impact:
    • Buffer Overflow: High Risk Reduction
    • Memory Corruption: High Risk Reduction
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Memory Exhaustion: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: No - Not currently implemented project-wide.
  • Missing Implementation: All modules that handle decompression of data from external sources. Needs to be implemented in data processing and API endpoints.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Safe zlib API Functions and Wrappers

  • Description:
    1. Review zlib API Usage: Carefully examine all instances in your codebase where zlib API functions are used directly.
    2. Prefer High-Level Wrappers: If possible, switch to using higher-level language-specific wrappers or libraries that abstract away direct memory management and provide safer interfaces for decompression.
    3. Use Bounds-Checking Functions (if available): If direct zlib API usage is necessary, prioritize using functions that offer built-in bounds checking or safer memory handling.
    4. Code Review for Memory Safety: Conduct thorough code reviews of all zlib-related code to identify potential memory management errors, buffer overflows, or incorrect API usage.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Buffer Overflow - Severity: High
    • Memory Corruption - Severity: High
  • Impact:
    • Buffer Overflow: Medium to High Risk Reduction (depending on wrapper effectiveness)
    • Memory Corruption: Medium to High Risk Reduction (depending on wrapper effectiveness)
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Some modules use higher-level libraries, but direct zlib usage might exist in older modules.
  • Missing Implementation: Legacy modules, low-level data processing components, and any newly developed modules that directly interact with zlib API without using safer wrappers. Requires audit and refactoring of direct zlib calls.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update the zlib Library

  • Description:
    1. Dependency Management System: Utilize a dependency management system to manage your project's dependencies, including zlib.
    2. Automated Dependency Checks: Integrate automated dependency scanning tools into your CI/CD pipeline to regularly check for known vulnerabilities in your dependencies, including zlib.
    3. Security Monitoring and Alerts: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases related to zlib to receive notifications about new vulnerabilities and updates.
    4. Prompt Patching and Updates: When security updates for zlib are released, prioritize applying these updates promptly. Test the updated library in a staging environment before deploying to production.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • All known zlib vulnerabilities (Buffer Overflow, Memory Corruption, DoS, etc.) - Severity: Varies (High to Medium depending on the vulnerability)
  • Impact:
    • All known zlib vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction (for known vulnerabilities)
  • Currently Implemented: Yes - Dependency management is in place, but automated vulnerability scanning and alerting might be missing or not consistently monitored.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated vulnerability scanning integration into CI/CD, proactive monitoring of security advisories, and a documented process for timely patching of dependencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Input Data Sizes

  • Description:
    1. Understand Size Limits: Review the zlib API documentation to understand the expected data types and size limitations for input parameters of zlib functions.
    2. Input Size Checks: Before calling zlib functions, validate that the input data sizes are within reasonable and safe ranges. Check for potential integer overflow conditions.
    3. Reject Out-of-Range Sizes: If input sizes are found to be outside the expected or safe ranges, reject the data and do not proceed with the zlib operation.
    4. Use Safe Data Types: Ensure that you are using appropriate data types to represent sizes and lengths to avoid potential integer overflows.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Integer Overflow - Severity: Medium
    • Potential Buffer Overflow (indirectly caused by integer overflow) - Severity: Medium
  • Impact:
    • Integer Overflow: High Risk Reduction
    • Potential Buffer Overflow: Medium Risk Reduction (indirectly)
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic input validation might exist in some modules, but specific checks for zlib API size limits and integer overflows are likely missing.
  • Missing Implementation: Needs to be implemented in all modules that interact with zlib API, adding explicit checks for input data sizes before calling zlib functions. Requires careful review of data type usage and potential overflow scenarios.

Mitigation Strategy: Careful Use of zlib API and Data Types

  • Description:
    1. Thorough API Documentation Review: Developers must thoroughly read and understand the zlib API documentation.
    2. Correct Data Type Usage: Pay close attention to the data types expected by zlib functions. Ensure that you are using compatible data types in your code.
    3. Error Handling Implementation: Properly implement error handling for zlib function calls. Check return values and handle potential errors gracefully. Do not ignore error codes.
    4. Code Reviews for API Misuse: Conduct code reviews specifically focused on zlib API usage to identify potential misinterpretations of the API, incorrect data type usage, or inadequate error handling.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Integer Overflow - Severity: Medium
    • Buffer Overflow - Severity: Medium
    • Memory Corruption - Severity: Medium
    • Unexpected Behavior - Severity: Medium
  • Impact:
    • Integer Overflow: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Buffer Overflow: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Memory Corruption: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Unexpected Behavior: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Code reviews are conducted, but specific focus on zlib API correctness might be inconsistent. Developer training on zlib API best practices might be lacking.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalized developer training on secure zlib API usage, dedicated code review checklists for zlib-related code, and potentially static analysis tools to detect API misuse.