Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (76 loc) · 7.34 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

105 lines (76 loc) · 7.34 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for madler/zlib

Mitigation Strategy: Output Buffer Size Management (with zlib Interaction)

Mitigation Strategy: Dynamic Output Buffering with Absolute Size Limit and avail_out Checks

Description:

  1. Initial Buffer Allocation: Start with a reasonably sized output buffer for inflate.
  2. inflate Call and Z_BUF_ERROR Handling: Call inflate. If it returns Z_BUF_ERROR, this may indicate insufficient output space.
  3. Dynamic Resizing (with Limit): If Z_BUF_ERROR is received, and the current buffer size is less than a predefined absolute maximum output buffer size, increase the output buffer size (e.g., double it). Reallocate the buffer.
  4. Absolute Maximum Check: Before reallocating, always check if the new size would exceed the absolute maximum. If it would, abort decompression, release resources, and return an error.
  5. avail_out Check: Before every call to inflate, ensure that z_stream.avail_out is greater than zero. This is a direct interaction with the zlib z_stream structure.
  6. Return Value Checks: Always check the return value of inflate. Handle all error codes (not just Z_BUF_ERROR) appropriately.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Buffer Overflow: (Severity: Critical) - Prevents writing beyond the output buffer, which could lead to code execution. This is directly mitigated by managing the buffer size in conjunction with zlib's avail_out and return values.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) via Memory Exhaustion: (Severity: High) - The absolute maximum output buffer size prevents unbounded memory allocation, limiting zlib's potential memory consumption.

Impact:

  • Buffer Overflow: Risk significantly reduced.
  • DoS (Memory): Risk significantly reduced.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: Dynamic resizing is implemented. Basic return value checking is present.

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: An absolute maximum output buffer size is not enforced.
  • Example: The avail_out check is not consistently performed before every inflate call.
  • Example: Comprehensive error handling for all inflate return values is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Custom Memory Allocator (Direct zlib Configuration)

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Custom zalloc and zfree for zlib

Description:

  1. Create Custom Functions: Define custom zalloc and zfree functions. These will replace zlib's default memory management.
  2. Tracking and Limits: Within these functions, track the total memory allocated by zlib. Implement a hard limit on this total.
  3. Allocation Failure Handling: If the limit is reached, zalloc should return Z_NULL. zlib will then return Z_MEM_ERROR. Handle this in your application.
  4. Memory Pool (Optional): Consider a memory pool within your custom allocator.
  5. Integration with zlib: When initializing the z_stream structure, set the zalloc, zfree, and opaque members to point to your custom functions and context data. This is a direct configuration of zlib's behavior.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) via Memory Exhaustion: (Severity: High) - Gives fine-grained control over zlib's memory usage.
  • Memory Leaks (Indirectly): (Severity: Medium) - Helps track zlib's memory usage.

Impact:

  • DoS (Memory): Risk significantly reduced.
  • Memory Leaks: Provides monitoring tools.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: Not currently implemented.

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: This entire strategy is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Header Inspection with inflateGetHeader (zlib API Usage)

Mitigation Strategy: Use inflateGetHeader for Pre-Decompression Checks (Format-Specific)

Description:

  1. Applicability Check: Determine if the compressed data format being used (e.g., gzip) supports header inspection via inflateGetHeader (or an equivalent function for the specific format).
  2. inflateGetHeader Call: Before calling inflate to perform the full decompression, call inflateGetHeader to retrieve header information. This is a direct use of the zlib API.
  3. Header Analysis: Analyze the header information. Look for:
    • Uncompressed size (if available). Reject if it exceeds a reasonable limit.
    • Other metadata that might indicate a malicious input (e.g., unusual flags, invalid values).
  4. Rejection Based on Header: If the header analysis reveals anything suspicious, reject the input without proceeding with full decompression.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS): (Severity: High) - Can prevent decompression of excessively large data based on header information, before allocating the full output buffer.
  • Potentially Malicious Input: (Severity: Variable) - Can help identify malformed or crafted input designed to exploit vulnerabilities.

Impact:

  • DoS: Risk reduced, especially for formats that provide uncompressed size in the header.
  • Malicious Input: Provides an early detection mechanism.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: Not currently implemented.

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: This entire strategy is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Buffer Management with next_in and avail_in (zlib API Usage)

Mitigation Strategy: Correctly manage next_in and avail_in during streaming decompression.

Description:

  1. Initialization: Properly initialize next_in to point to the beginning of the compressed data buffer and avail_in to the number of bytes in the buffer.
  2. inflate Calls: After each call to inflate, update next_in and avail_in based on how much data zlib consumed. next_in should be incremented by the number of bytes consumed, and avail_in should be decremented by the same amount. This is critical for correct streaming operation.
  3. Buffer Boundaries: Ensure that you never read past the end of the input buffer. avail_in should always accurately reflect the remaining bytes.
  4. Looping: If you are decompressing in a loop (streaming), repeat steps 2 and 3 until inflate returns Z_STREAM_END or an error.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Buffer Over-reads/Under-reads: (Severity: Medium to High) - Incorrect management of next_in and avail_in can lead to reading data outside the intended buffer boundaries, potentially causing crashes or revealing sensitive information.
  • Logic Errors: (Severity: Medium) - Incorrect streaming handling can lead to incorrect decompression results or infinite loops.

Impact:

  • Buffer Over-reads/Under-reads: Risk significantly reduced with correct next_in and avail_in management.
  • Logic Errors: Risk reduced by ensuring correct streaming behavior.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: Basic next_in and avail_in handling is present.

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: The code needs a thorough review to ensure that next_in and avail_in are always updated correctly after every inflate call, especially in edge cases or error conditions.