Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (58 loc) · 6.18 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (58 loc) · 6.18 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for mozilla/mozjpeg

Mitigation Strategy: Library Version Management and Patching

Mitigation Strategy: Stay Up-to-Date

Description:

  1. Dependency Management: Use a dependency manager (e.g., pip, npm, Cargo) to manage the mozjpeg library (or its language-specific bindings) as a project dependency.
  2. Version Specification: In the dependency configuration (e.g., requirements.txt, package.json, Cargo.toml), specify the mozjpeg version. Start with the latest stable release.
  3. Automated Updates: Configure a tool like Dependabot or Snyk to automatically monitor for new mozjpeg releases and create pull requests/merge requests to update the dependency.
  4. Manual Checks: Periodically (e.g., monthly) manually check the mozjpeg GitHub repository for new releases or security advisories.
  5. CI/CD Integration: Integrate dependency updates into your CI/CD pipeline. The pipeline should automatically build and test the application with the updated library.
  6. Testing: After updating mozjpeg, run comprehensive tests (unit, integration, fuzz) to ensure no regressions or compatibility issues.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Known Vulnerabilities (Critical): Exploitation of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in older mozjpeg versions. Could lead to arbitrary code execution, DoS, or information disclosure.
  • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities (High): Reduces the window of exposure to zero-days. Patches are often released quickly after discovery.

Impact:

  • Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High. The most effective mitigation against known exploits.
  • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: Moderate. Reduces the time your application is vulnerable.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "Partially Implemented. We use pip and requirements.txt, but Dependabot is not configured. Updates are manual." (Replace with your actual status).
  • Specify the file/location (e.g., "requirements.txt").

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "Dependabot integration is missing. Automated testing after dependency updates is not fully integrated into the CI/CD pipeline." (Replace with your actual missing parts).

Mitigation Strategy: Fuzzing and Testing (Direct mozjpeg Interaction)

Mitigation Strategy: Fuzz mozjpeg Integration

Description:

  1. Choose Fuzzing Tool: Select a fuzzing tool (e.g., AFL, libFuzzer, OSS-Fuzz).
  2. Create Fuzz Target: Write a "fuzz target" – a function or program that takes input data (a byte stream representing a potential JPEG image) and passes it directly to the mozjpeg API (or the language-specific bindings you are using). This is crucial: the fuzzer should be interacting with mozjpeg as closely as possible to how your application uses it.
  3. Instrumentation: The fuzzing tool will instrument your code (and potentially the mozjpeg library) to track code coverage and detect crashes/hangs.
  4. Run Fuzzer: Run the fuzzer with a corpus of initial input files (seed files). The fuzzer will mutate these and generate new inputs.
  5. Monitor and Triage: Monitor for crashes, hangs, or unexpected behavior. Analyze crashing inputs and stack traces to identify vulnerabilities.
  6. Fix and Repeat: Fix identified vulnerabilities and repeat the fuzzing process. Fuzzing is iterative.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Unknown Vulnerabilities (High): Discovers previously unknown vulnerabilities within mozjpeg itself or in how your code interacts with it. This includes buffer overflows, out-of-bounds reads/writes, integer overflows, and other memory corruption issues.
  • Logic Errors (Moderate): Can help identify logic errors in your code that are specific to how you use the mozjpeg API.

Impact:

  • Unknown Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High. Proactively identifies vulnerabilities.
  • Logic Errors: Risk reduction: Moderate.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "Not Implemented."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "We have not integrated any fuzzing that directly targets our mozjpeg usage."

Mitigation Strategy: mozjpeg Specific Configuration (If Applicable)

Mitigation Strategy: Review and Secure mozjpeg Configuration Options

Description:

  1. Identify Configuration Options: If your language bindings or wrapper around mozjpeg expose any configuration options (e.g., quality settings, memory limits, specific encoding features), carefully review the documentation for these options.
  2. Security Implications: Understand the security implications of each option. Some options might have performance trade-offs or might affect the library's behavior in ways that could introduce vulnerabilities.
  3. Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege. Use the most restrictive settings that still meet your application's requirements. Avoid enabling unnecessary features or using overly permissive settings.
  4. Document Configuration: Clearly document the chosen mozjpeg configuration and the rationale behind it.
  5. Regular Review: Periodically review the configuration to ensure it remains appropriate and secure, especially after updating mozjpeg.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities (Moderate): Reduces the risk of vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure mozjpeg configuration.
  • Performance-Related Issues (Low): Can help prevent performance issues that might be exploited for denial-of-service.

Impact:

  • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: Low to Moderate (depends on the specific options and their security implications).
  • Performance-Related Issues: Risk reduction: Low.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "Partially Implemented. We set the quality level, but haven't reviewed other available options."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "We need to thoroughly review all available mozjpeg configuration options exposed by our bindings and document our choices."