Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation for stb
Inputs
- Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation for
stb
Inputs - Description:
- File Format Verification (Magic Bytes): Before passing a file path or file data to any
stb
loading function (e.g.,stbi_load
,stbtt_InitFont
), read the initial bytes of the file (magic bytes or file header). Compare these bytes against known signatures for the expected file type (e.g., PNG, JPEG, TrueType). This ensures the file is genuinely of the expected format and not disguised as another type to exploit parsing vulnerabilities instb
. - Size Limits for
stb
Inputs: Implement size limits specifically for inputs processed bystb
. This includes:- Maximum File Size: Limit the maximum size of files loaded by
stb
to prevent processing excessively large files that could trigger resource exhaustion or buffer overflows withinstb
. - Maximum Image Dimensions: For image loading with
stb_image
, enforce maximum limits on image width and height to prevent processing extremely large images that could lead to memory allocation issues or DoS. - Maximum Font Size/Glyph Count (if applicable): For font parsing with
stb_truetype
, consider limits on font file size or the complexity of font data processed bystb
.
- Maximum File Size: Limit the maximum size of files loaded by
- Range Checks for Data Passed to
stb
Functions: When passing parameters tostb
functions, especially those derived from external input, perform range checks. For example:- If using
stbi_load_from_memory
with a size parameter, ensure the size is within reasonable bounds and consistent with the actual data length. - If using
stbtt_FindGlyphIndex
with a character code, validate the character code if it originates from untrusted input.
- If using
- File Format Verification (Magic Bytes): Before passing a file path or file data to any
- Threats Mitigated:
- Buffer Overflow in
stb
(High Severity): Maliciously crafted input files designed to exploit parsing vulnerabilities withinstb
can cause buffer overflows ifstb
attempts to process unexpected or oversized data. Input validation reduces the likelihood of passing such malicious inputs tostb
. - Denial of Service via
stb
(Medium Severity): Processing extremely large or complex files withstb
without size limits can lead to excessive resource consumption (memory, CPU) withinstb
's processing, resulting in a denial of service. Input validation with size limits mitigates this.
- Buffer Overflow in
- Impact:
- Buffer Overflow in
stb
: Significantly Reduces risk. - Denial of Service via
stb
: Moderately Reduces risk.
- Buffer Overflow in
- Currently Implemented: [Specify if input validation for
stb
inputs is currently implemented in your project and where. For example: "Yes, partially implemented for image loading, checking file extensions before usingstbi_load
but not magic bytes.", or "No, input validation specific tostb
inputs is not currently implemented.", or "Yes, fully implemented for allstb
usages, including magic byte checks, size limits, and parameter range checks."] - Missing Implementation: [Specify where input validation for
stb
inputs is missing or needs improvement. For example: "Magic byte verification is missing before callingstbi_load
.", "Size limits are not enforced for files processed bystbtt_InitFont
.", or "Range checks are not implemented for parameters passed tostb_image_write
functions." or "No missing implementation."]
Mitigation Strategy: Application-Level Memory Management Around stb
Usage
- Mitigation Strategy: Application-Level Memory Management Around
stb
Usage - Description:
- Size Awareness of
stb
Outputs: When usingstb
functions that return data (e.g.,stbi_load
returning image data,stbtt_GetFontVMetrics
returning font metrics), always be aware of the size of the data being returned. Use the size information provided bystb
(e.g., image dimensions fromstbi_load
, font metrics) to correctly manage memory. - Sufficient Buffer Allocation for
stb
Outputs: Ensure that your application allocates sufficient memory buffers to store the data returned bystb
functions. Calculate the required buffer size based on the size information provided bystb
. For example, for image data fromstbi_load
, allocate memory based onwidth * height * channels
. - Bounds Checking When Accessing
stb
Data: Implement explicit bounds checking in your application code when accessing or manipulating data loaded bystb
. For instance, when iterating through pixels of an image loaded bystbi_load
, ensure you do not access memory outside the allocated buffer based on the image dimensions returned bystbi_load
. - Proper Memory Deallocation for
stb
Data: Ensure that memory allocated bystb
functions (e.g., data returned bystbi_load
which needs to be freed withstbi_image_free
) is properly deallocated when it is no longer needed. Failure to do so can lead to memory leaks, which while not directly a vulnerability instb
, can impact application stability and potentially be exploited in DoS scenarios.
- Size Awareness of
- Threats Mitigated:
- Buffer Overflow due to Misuse of
stb
Output (High Severity): Incorrect memory management in the application code aroundstb
usage, such as writing beyond allocated buffers when processingstb
's output, can lead to buffer overflows. Proper size awareness and bounds checking mitigate this. - Memory Leaks due to Improper
stb
Memory Handling (Medium Severity): Failure to free memory allocated bystb
functions can lead to memory leaks, potentially causing application instability or DoS over time. Proper memory deallocation mitigates this.
- Buffer Overflow due to Misuse of
- Impact:
- Buffer Overflow due to Misuse of
stb
Output: Significantly Reduces risk. - Memory Leaks due to Improper
stb
Memory Handling: Moderately Reduces risk.
- Buffer Overflow due to Misuse of
- Currently Implemented: [Specify if application-level memory management around
stb
usage is currently implemented in your project and where. For example: "Yes, we are aware ofstb
output sizes and allocate memory accordingly, but explicit bounds checking might be missing in some areas.", or "No, memory management aroundstb
is not explicitly addressed.", or "Yes, we have size awareness, buffer allocation, bounds checking, and proper deallocation for allstb
data in the image loading module."] - Missing Implementation: [Specify where application-level memory management around
stb
usage is missing or needs improvement. For example: "Explicit bounds checking is missing when processing image data loaded bystbi_load
.", "Memory deallocation for font data loaded bystbtt_InitFont
is not consistently handled.", or "Size awareness ofstb
outputs is not consistently implemented across all modules usingstb
." or "No missing implementation."]
Mitigation Strategy: Timeout Mechanisms for stb
Operations
- Mitigation Strategy: Timeout Mechanisms for
stb
Operations - Description:
- Implement Timeouts for
stb
Loading Functions: Wrap calls tostb
loading functions (e.g.,stbi_load
,stbtt_InitFont
) with timeout mechanisms. Set a reasonable time limit for these operations to complete. If anstb
function takes longer than the timeout period, interrupt the operation and handle the timeout gracefully (e.g., return an error, log the event). - Timeout Duration Configuration: Configure the timeout duration based on the expected processing time for typical inputs and the acceptable latency for your application. The timeout should be long enough for legitimate files but short enough to prevent excessive delays caused by maliciously crafted inputs designed to slow down
stb
processing.
- Implement Timeouts for
- Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service via Algorithmic Complexity in
stb
(Medium to High Severity): Maliciously crafted input files can exploit algorithmic inefficiencies or complex processing paths withinstb
libraries, causing them to take an excessively long time to process. Timeouts prevent these operations from hanging indefinitely and consuming resources, mitigating DoS attacks.
- Denial of Service via Algorithmic Complexity in
- Impact:
- Denial of Service via Algorithmic Complexity in
stb
: Moderately to Significantly Reduces risk.
- Denial of Service via Algorithmic Complexity in
- Currently Implemented: [Specify if timeout mechanisms for
stb
operations are currently implemented in your project and where. For example: "Yes, we have timeouts implemented for image loading usingstbi_load
.", or "No, timeout mechanisms are not currently implemented forstb
operations.", or "Yes, timeouts are implemented for both image and font loading operations usingstb_image
andstb_truetype
."] - Missing Implementation: [Specify where timeout mechanisms for
stb
operations are missing or need improvement. For example: "Timeouts are not implemented for font parsing usingstb_truetype
.", "Timeout durations are not configurable and might be too long.", or "Timeouts are only implemented for image loading, not for otherstb
usages." or "No missing implementation."]
Mitigation Strategy: Monitoring for Errors and Unexpected Behavior in stb
Usage
- Mitigation Strategy: Monitoring for Errors and Unexpected Behavior in
stb
Usage - Description:
- Error Handling and Logging Around
stb
Calls: Implement robust error handling around all calls tostb
functions. Check the return values ofstb
functions for errors (e.g.,NULL
return fromstbi_load
indicating loading failure, error codes fromstbtt_...
functions). Log these errors, including details about the input file or data that caused the error. - Monitoring Error Logs for
stb
-Related Issues: Regularly monitor application error logs for any occurrences ofstb
-related errors. An increase instb
loading or parsing errors, especially when processing untrusted input, could indicate potential malicious activity or attempts to exploit vulnerabilities instb
or its usage. - Performance Monitoring of
stb
Operations: Monitor the performance ofstb
operations, such as loading times and resource consumption (CPU, memory). Unexpectedly long processing times or high resource usage duringstb
operations could be a sign of a DoS attack or an attempt to exploit algorithmic complexity issues instb
.
- Error Handling and Logging Around
- Threats Mitigated:
- Exploitation Attempts Targeting
stb
(Early Detection - Medium Severity): Monitoring error logs and performance can help detect potential exploitation attempts targeting vulnerabilities instb
or its usage by identifying unusual error patterns or performance degradation. - Denial of Service Attempts via
stb
(Detection - Medium Severity): Performance monitoring can help detect DoS attempts that exploit algorithmic complexity instb
by identifying unusually long processing times or high resource consumption.
- Exploitation Attempts Targeting
- Impact:
- Exploitation Attempts Targeting
stb
: Moderately Reduces risk (early detection and response). - Denial of Service Attempts via
stb
: Moderately Reduces risk (detection and response).
- Exploitation Attempts Targeting
- Currently Implemented: [Specify if monitoring for errors and unexpected behavior in
stb
usage is currently implemented in your project and where. For example: "Yes, we log errors returned bystbi_load
and otherstb
functions.", or "No, we do not have specific monitoring for errors related tostb
usage.", or "Yes, we logstb
errors and monitor performance metrics like image loading times in our image processing module."] - Missing Implementation: [Specify where monitoring for errors and unexpected behavior in
stb
usage is missing or needs improvement. For example: "Error logging forstbtt_...
functions is not implemented.", "Performance monitoring is not in place forstb
operations.", or "Error logs are not regularly reviewed forstb
-related issues." or "No missing implementation."]