Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
117 lines (102 loc) · 16.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

117 lines (102 loc) · 16.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for openssl/openssl

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update OpenSSL Library

  • Description:
    1. Establish OpenSSL Update Monitoring: Specifically monitor OpenSSL security advisories and release notes for new versions and security patches.
    2. Utilize Package Managers or Build Systems: Leverage package managers (e.g., apt, yum, brew) or build systems to easily update the OpenSSL library used by your application.
    3. Prioritize Security Updates: Treat OpenSSL security updates as high priority and expedite testing and deployment to production environments.
    4. Track OpenSSL Version: Maintain a clear record of the OpenSSL version used in each environment to ensure consistency and facilitate update tracking.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known OpenSSL Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Attackers can exploit publicly disclosed vulnerabilities specific to outdated OpenSSL versions to compromise the application.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known OpenSSL Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction - Directly eliminates known vulnerabilities by applying OpenSSL provided patches.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. We track library versions, but the OpenSSL update process is not fully automated and relies on manual intervention.
  • Missing Implementation: Full automation of OpenSSL updates, specifically focusing on timely application of security patches released by the OpenSSL project.

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Insecure Protocols and Weak Ciphers in OpenSSL Configuration

  • Description:
    1. Configure OpenSSL Protocol Settings: Utilize OpenSSL configuration directives (e.g., in ssl.conf, application context settings) to explicitly disable SSLv2 and SSLv3 protocols.
    2. Define Strong Cipher Suites in OpenSSL: Configure OpenSSL to only use strong and modern cipher suites. Specify the cipher list using OpenSSL syntax, prioritizing TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 ciphers with algorithms like AES-GCM or ChaCha20-Poly1305.
    3. Utilize OpenSSL Configuration Options: Leverage OpenSSL's configuration options to enforce these settings at the application or system level, ensuring consistent application of secure protocols and ciphers.
    4. Regularly Audit OpenSSL Cipher Configuration: Periodically review the configured cipher suites and protocol settings against current security best practices and OpenSSL recommendations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Protocol Downgrade Attacks Exploiting OpenSSL Weaknesses (Medium to High Severity): Attackers can force the use of weaker protocols supported by OpenSSL to exploit protocol-level vulnerabilities within OpenSSL's implementation.
    • Cipher Suite Weakness Exploitation within OpenSSL (Medium Severity): Weak ciphers enabled in OpenSSL can be targeted for cryptanalysis or brute-force attacks, compromising confidentiality of communications secured by OpenSSL.
  • Impact:
    • Protocol Downgrade Attacks: High Risk Reduction - Prevents downgrading to vulnerable protocols handled by OpenSSL.
    • Cipher Suite Weakness Exploitation: Medium to High Risk Reduction - Enforces strong encryption algorithms supported by OpenSSL.
  • Currently Implemented: Implemented in web server configurations and application TLS contexts that utilize OpenSSL. Insecure protocols are disabled, and strong cipher suites are enforced via OpenSSL configuration.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated checks to continuously verify OpenSSL cipher and protocol configurations across all services and applications using OpenSSL, ensuring no configuration drift occurs.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Cryptographic Settings via OpenSSL APIs and Configuration

  • Description:
    1. Utilize OpenSSL API for Key Generation with Strong Parameters: When using OpenSSL APIs for key generation (e.g., RSA_generate_key_ex, EC_KEY_generate_key), explicitly specify strong key lengths (e.g., 2048+ bits for RSA) and secure elliptic curves (e.g., P-256, Curve25519).
    2. Configure OpenSSL for Minimum Key Lengths: If applicable, use OpenSSL configuration options to set minimum acceptable key lengths for different cryptographic algorithms used by OpenSSL.
    3. Validate Cryptographic Parameters with OpenSSL Functions: If dynamically generating parameters, use OpenSSL's parameter validation functions to ensure they meet security criteria before using them with OpenSSL cryptographic operations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Brute-Force Attacks on Weak Keys Generated by OpenSSL (Medium to High Severity): Short key lengths generated or accepted by OpenSSL are more vulnerable to brute-force attacks, potentially compromising keys managed by OpenSSL.
    • Cryptographic Weaknesses in Elliptic Curves Used by OpenSSL (Medium Severity): Using weak or outdated elliptic curves within OpenSSL can introduce vulnerabilities in ECC-based cryptography implemented with OpenSSL.
  • Impact:
    • Brute-Force Attacks on Weak Keys: High Risk Reduction - Increases the computational cost of brute-force attacks against keys handled by OpenSSL.
    • Cryptographic Weaknesses in Elliptic Curves: Medium to High Risk Reduction - Ensures usage of secure and recommended elliptic curves within OpenSSL operations.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Minimum key lengths are generally enforced in certificate generation processes that utilize OpenSSL. Strong elliptic curves are configured in server settings using OpenSSL.
  • Missing Implementation: Systematic review and enforcement of strong cryptographic settings in all application code that directly uses OpenSSL APIs for key generation and parameter negotiation. Automated checks to verify these settings are consistently applied in OpenSSL usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Key Generation and Storage Practices with OpenSSL Tools

  • Description:
    1. Leverage OpenSSL for Secure Key Generation: Utilize OpenSSL command-line tools (e.g., openssl genrsa, openssl ecparam -genkey) or APIs to generate private keys, ensuring the use of cryptographically secure random number generation provided by OpenSSL.
    2. Encrypt Private Keys using OpenSSL Encryption: Encrypt private keys at rest using OpenSSL's encryption capabilities (e.g., openssl aes-256-cbc) with strong passwords or key derivation functions before storing them.
    3. Control Access to OpenSSL Key Storage: Implement strict access control mechanisms at the operating system level to restrict access to directories and files where OpenSSL private keys are stored.
    4. Consider HSM/KMS Integration with OpenSSL: Explore integrating Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) or Key Management Systems (KMS) with OpenSSL for enhanced security in key generation and storage, leveraging OpenSSL's engine interface if needed.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Private Key Compromise due to Insecure OpenSSL Key Handling (Critical Severity): If private keys managed by OpenSSL are compromised due to weak generation or storage, attackers can severely impact security.
    • Weak Key Generation using OpenSSL (Medium Severity): Improper use of OpenSSL for key generation could lead to weak or predictable keys.
    • Unauthorized Access to OpenSSL Managed Keys (High Severity): Lack of access control to OpenSSL key storage can lead to unauthorized key access and compromise.
  • Impact:
    • Private Key Compromise: High Risk Reduction - Significantly reduces the risk of key compromise by using secure OpenSSL practices for generation and storage.
    • Weak Key Generation: High Risk Reduction - Ensures keys are generated using secure OpenSSL functionalities.
    • Unauthorized Access to Keys: High Risk Reduction - Limits access to sensitive keys managed by OpenSSL.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Private keys generated using OpenSSL are encrypted at rest. Access control is in place on key storage locations. Key generation relies on OpenSSL's CSPRNG.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalize and document key management procedures specifically around OpenSSL usage. Further explore HSM/KMS integration with OpenSSL for highly sensitive applications. Regular audits of OpenSSL key storage and access controls.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for OpenSSL API Inputs

  • Description:
    1. Identify OpenSSL API Input Points: Specifically identify all locations in the application code where user-provided or external data is passed as arguments to OpenSSL APIs (e.g., certificate parsing functions, encryption/decryption routines).
    2. Validate Input Data Before OpenSSL API Calls: Implement input validation before passing data to OpenSSL APIs. Ensure data conforms to expected formats, lengths, and character sets relevant to the specific OpenSSL function.
    3. Sanitize Input Data for OpenSSL APIs: Sanitize input data to remove or escape potentially malicious characters or sequences that could be misinterpreted or cause issues when processed by OpenSSL functions.
    4. Use Secure OpenSSL API Usage Patterns: Follow secure coding practices when using OpenSSL APIs, being mindful of potential buffer overflows, format string vulnerabilities, and other input-related issues specific to OpenSSL functions.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL APIs (High Severity): Maliciously crafted input to OpenSSL APIs can trigger buffer overflows within OpenSSL library code, leading to code execution.
    • Format String Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL API Usage (Medium to High Severity): Improperly handling user input in format strings passed to certain OpenSSL functions can lead to information disclosure or code execution through OpenSSL.
    • Injection Attacks Targeting OpenSSL Processing (Medium Severity): Crafted input could exploit vulnerabilities in how OpenSSL parses or processes data, leading to unexpected behavior or security breaches within the OpenSSL context.
  • Impact:
    • Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL: High Risk Reduction - Prevents a major class of memory corruption vulnerabilities within OpenSSL.
    • Format String Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL API Usage: High Risk Reduction - Eliminates format string attack vectors related to OpenSSL API usage.
    • Injection Attacks Targeting OpenSSL: Medium to High Risk Reduction - Reduces the likelihood of various injection-based attacks exploiting OpenSSL's data processing.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Input validation is performed in parts of the application, but not consistently applied to all interactions with OpenSSL APIs.
  • Missing Implementation: Systematic and comprehensive review of all OpenSSL API usage to ensure robust input validation and sanitization is implemented before calling OpenSSL functions. Develop coding guidelines specifically for secure OpenSSL API usage. Static analysis tools configured to identify potential input validation gaps in OpenSSL API calls.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Compilation of OpenSSL from Source

  • Description:
    1. Compile OpenSSL with Security Flags: When building OpenSSL from source, use compiler flags specifically recommended for security hardening, such as -fstack-protector-strong, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, and -pie -fPIC. These flags enhance the security of the compiled OpenSSL library itself.
    2. Enable ASLR for OpenSSL Libraries: Ensure Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) is enabled at the operating system level where the compiled OpenSSL library will be deployed. ASLR protects against memory corruption exploits targeting OpenSSL.
    3. Use a Security-Focused Compiler for OpenSSL: Utilize a modern compiler (e.g., GCC, Clang) with up-to-date security features and optimizations when compiling OpenSSL.
    4. Static Analysis of OpenSSL Source during Build: Integrate static analysis tools into the OpenSSL build process to proactively identify potential vulnerabilities in the OpenSSL source code itself before deployment.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Buffer Overflows in Compiled OpenSSL Library (High Severity): Secure compilation flags and ASLR make it significantly harder to exploit buffer overflow vulnerabilities that might exist within the compiled OpenSSL library.
    • Code Injection Attacks Targeting Compiled OpenSSL (High Severity): Mitigates the impact of successful buffer overflow or other memory corruption exploits within OpenSSL by making code injection more difficult in the hardened compiled library.
  • Impact:
    • Buffer Overflow Exploitation in OpenSSL: High Risk Reduction - Increases the difficulty and cost of exploiting buffer overflows within the compiled OpenSSL library.
    • Code Injection Attacks Targeting OpenSSL: High Risk Reduction - Makes code injection attacks against the compiled OpenSSL library less reliable and more challenging.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Compiler flags like -fstack-protector-strong and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 are used in some OpenSSL build configurations, but not consistently. ASLR is generally enabled at the OS level.
  • Missing Implementation: Standardize secure compiler flags across all OpenSSL builds and ensure consistent application in all environments. Formalize the secure OpenSSL compilation process and integrate it into build pipelines. Explore more advanced compiler-based security hardening techniques specifically for OpenSSL builds.

Mitigation Strategy: Runtime Monitoring and Logging of OpenSSL Specific Events

  • Description:
    1. Enable Detailed OpenSSL Logging: Configure logging to capture specific OpenSSL events, such as TLS handshake details (cipher suites negotiated, protocol versions), certificate validation results (errors, warnings), and OpenSSL error conditions.
    2. Focus on OpenSSL Security Relevant Logs: Prioritize logging events that are directly relevant to OpenSSL security, such as failed TLS handshakes, certificate errors, and cryptographic operation failures.
    3. Monitor OpenSSL Logs for Security Anomalies: Implement monitoring rules to detect suspicious patterns in OpenSSL logs that could indicate attacks or misconfigurations, such as repeated handshake failures from specific sources, certificate validation issues, or unexpected error messages from OpenSSL.
    4. Integrate OpenSSL Logs into SIEM: Integrate OpenSSL specific logs into a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system for centralized analysis, correlation with other security events, and proactive threat detection related to OpenSSL usage.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Active Attacks Targeting OpenSSL Vulnerabilities or Misconfigurations (High Severity): Runtime monitoring of OpenSSL events can help detect ongoing attacks that exploit specific OpenSSL weaknesses.
    • Misconfigurations and Errors in OpenSSL Usage (Medium Severity): Logging can identify misconfigurations or errors in how OpenSSL is used, which could lead to security vulnerabilities or operational problems.
    • Post-Incident Analysis of OpenSSL Related Security Events (Varies): Detailed OpenSSL logs are crucial for post-incident analysis to understand the specifics of security incidents involving OpenSSL.
  • Impact:
    • Active Attacks Targeting OpenSSL: Medium Risk Reduction - Enables faster detection and response to active attacks targeting OpenSSL.
    • Misconfigurations and Errors in OpenSSL Usage: Medium Risk Reduction - Helps identify and remediate configuration issues and errors in OpenSSL usage proactively.
    • Post-Incident Analysis of OpenSSL Events: High Risk Reduction - Provides valuable data for understanding and learning from security incidents related to OpenSSL.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic logging of TLS connection events is enabled in web servers using OpenSSL. Application-level logging of detailed OpenSSL events is inconsistent.
  • Missing Implementation: Implement comprehensive and consistent logging of OpenSSL specific events across all applications and services utilizing OpenSSL. Refine monitoring rules and alerts to specifically detect security-relevant anomalies in OpenSSL logs. Full integration of detailed OpenSSL logs into our SIEM system.