Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
61 lines (52 loc) · 6.8 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

61 lines (52 loc) · 6.8 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ossec/ossec-hids

Attack Surface: 1. Remote Agent Communication (ossec-remoted)

  • Description: The ossec-remoted daemon on the OSSEC server handles communication with agents, typically over UDP port 1514. This is the primary communication channel and a major attack vector.
  • How OSSEC Contributes: This is a core, essential component of OSSEC's agent/server architecture. Its very existence creates this attack surface.
  • Example: An attacker sends a crafted UDP packet to port 1514, exploiting a buffer overflow vulnerability in ossec-remoted to achieve remote code execution.
  • Impact: Complete compromise of the OSSEC server, allowing the attacker to control all connected agents, modify rules, and access sensitive data.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Firewalling: Strictly limit access to UDP port 1514 to only authorized agent IP addresses using a host-based firewall (e.g., iptables, firewalld) and network firewalls.
    • Regular Updates: Keep OSSEC HIDS updated to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities in ossec-remoted. This is crucial.
    • Input Validation: (For developers) Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization in ossec-remoted to prevent buffer overflows and other injection attacks. This is a fundamental security practice.
    • Network Segmentation: Place OSSEC agents and the server on a dedicated, isolated network segment to limit the impact of a compromise.
    • VPN/Tunneling: Use a VPN or other secure tunnel for agent communication, especially if agents are on untrusted networks.
    • Intrusion Detection/Prevention: Deploy network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor for and block malicious traffic targeting ossec-remoted.

Attack Surface: 2. Agent Authentication Weakness

  • Description: OSSEC agents authenticate to the server, typically using a pre-shared key or password. Weak or default credentials allow attackers to impersonate legitimate agents.
  • How OSSEC Contributes: OSSEC's built-in agent authentication mechanism, if misconfigured, is the direct source of this vulnerability.
  • Example: An attacker uses a brute-force attack to guess the agent authentication key, allowing them to register a malicious agent with the server.
  • Impact: The attacker can inject false data into the OSSEC system, potentially masking real attacks or triggering false alerts. They might also gain access to information reported by legitimate agents.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong, Unique Keys: Use strong, unique, and randomly generated pre-shared keys for each agent. Avoid using default keys or easily guessable passwords. This is non-negotiable.
    • Key Rotation: Implement a process for regularly rotating agent authentication keys.
    • ossec-authd Security: If using ossec-authd, strictly limit network access to it (ideally, only allow connections from localhost). Disable it when not actively enrolling agents. This component is often a point of weakness.
    • Centralized Key Management: Consider using a centralized key management system to securely store and manage agent keys.
    • Monitoring: Monitor OSSEC logs for failed authentication attempts and unauthorized agent registrations.

Attack Surface: 3. Log Analysis Vulnerabilities (ossec-analysisd)

  • Description: The ossec-analysisd daemon processes logs and applies rules. Vulnerabilities in the rule engine or log parsing logic can be exploited via crafted log entries.
  • How OSSEC Contributes: This is the core log analysis engine of OSSEC, making it an inherent attack surface. The complexity of rule processing introduces risk.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a log entry containing a malicious regular expression designed to cause a denial-of-service (ReDoS) attack against ossec-analysisd.
  • Impact: Denial-of-service of the OSSEC server, preventing it from processing logs and generating alerts. In rare cases, code execution might be possible, depending on the specific vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Keep OSSEC HIDS updated to the latest version. This is the primary defense against known vulnerabilities.
    • Rule Review: Thoroughly review and test all custom OSSEC rules, especially those using regular expressions. Avoid overly complex or nested regular expressions. This is critical for preventing ReDoS.
    • Input Validation: (For developers) Implement robust input validation and sanitization in ossec-analysisd to prevent injection attacks.
    • Resource Limits: Configure resource limits (e.g., memory, CPU) for ossec-analysisd to mitigate the impact of denial-of-service attacks.
    • Log Source Validation: Whenever possible, validate the authenticity and integrity of log sources before they are processed by OSSEC.
    • Dedicated Testing Environment: Use a separate, isolated environment to test new rules and decoders before deploying them to production.

Attack Surface: 4. API Exposure (if enabled)

  • Description: The OSSEC API, if enabled, provides programmatic access to the OSSEC server. Without proper security, it's a direct path to compromise.
  • How OSSEC Contributes: The API is a built-in feature of OSSEC, and its security is entirely dependent on proper configuration. Its existence is the attack surface.
  • Example: An attacker accesses the exposed OSSEC API without authentication and uses it to disable all alerts and add a malicious agent.
  • Impact: Complete control over the OSSEC server, allowing the attacker to manipulate rules, agents, and data.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Disable if Unused: Disable the OSSEC API if it's not strictly required. This is the most effective mitigation if the API is not needed.
    • Strong Authentication: Enable strong authentication for the API, using API keys or TLS client certificates.
    • Authorization: Implement granular authorization controls to restrict API access to specific users and actions.
    • Network Restrictions: Limit API access to specific IP addresses or networks using a firewall.
    • Reverse Proxy: Use a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache) with authentication, rate limiting, and TLS termination in front of the API.
    • Auditing: Enable detailed API logging and regularly audit API usage.