Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
84 lines (66 loc) · 203 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

84 lines (66 loc) · 203 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of hiredis based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the hiredis C client library, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing their impact, and recommending mitigation strategies. The analysis will cover key components like connection handling, data serialization/deserialization, command parsing, and error handling. We aim to provide actionable recommendations to improve the security posture of applications using hiredis.

  • Scope:

    • The hiredis library itself (source code, build process, and dependencies).
    • The interaction between hiredis and a Redis server.
    • Common usage patterns and potential misuse scenarios.
    • Exclusion: The security of the Redis server itself is out of scope, except where hiredis's behavior could exacerbate server-side vulnerabilities. We assume the Redis server is configured securely as per best practices.

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review: Analyze the hiredis source code (available on GitHub) to identify potential vulnerabilities, focusing on areas identified in the design review and common C programming pitfalls.
    2. Dependency Analysis: Examine hiredis's dependencies (if any) for known vulnerabilities.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the library's functionality and usage scenarios.
    4. Documentation Review: Analyze the official hiredis documentation and any related security advisories.
    5. Inference: Based on the code, documentation, and design review, infer the architecture, components, and data flow.
    6. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies for identified vulnerabilities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components (Inferred from Codebase and Documentation)

Based on the design review and a preliminary examination of the hiredis codebase (https://github.com/redis/hiredis), we can infer the following key components and their security implications:

  • 2.1 Connection Handling (hiredis.c, net.c, async.c)

    • Architecture: Hiredis uses TCP sockets for communication with the Redis server. It supports both synchronous and asynchronous connections. The connect() family of functions establishes the connection.
    • Components:
      • Socket creation and management.
      • Address resolution (DNS lookup).
      • Connection establishment (TCP handshake).
      • Timeout handling.
    • Data Flow: The application initiates a connection request. Hiredis resolves the Redis server's address, creates a socket, and establishes a TCP connection.
    • Security Implications:
      • Unencrypted Communication (Accepted Risk): As noted, hiredis doesn't handle TLS itself. Without TLS, connections are vulnerable to eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. This is a critical accepted risk that needs to be addressed at the application or infrastructure level.
      • Connection Leaks: If connections aren't properly closed, resource exhaustion could occur on both the client and server, leading to denial of service (DoS).
      • Timeout Issues: Improperly configured timeouts could lead to application hangs or resource exhaustion.
      • DNS Spoofing: If an attacker can poison the DNS cache, they could redirect hiredis to a malicious server.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) via Connection Exhaustion: An attacker could flood the application with connection attempts, exhausting resources and preventing legitimate connections.

  • 2.2 Data Serialization/Deserialization (hiredis.c, read.c)

    • Architecture: Hiredis uses the Redis Serialization Protocol (RESP) to encode and decode data sent to and received from the Redis server. The reader.c and related files handle parsing the RESP responses.
    • Components:
      • Parsing RESP data types (strings, integers, arrays, errors, etc.).
      • Allocating memory to store received data.
      • Converting RESP data to C data types.
    • Data Flow: Data received from the Redis server is parsed according to the RESP protocol. Memory is allocated to store the parsed data, and it's converted to C data types for use by the application.
    • Security Implications:
      • Buffer Overflows: The most critical area for security vulnerabilities in hiredis. Incorrectly parsing RESP data, especially strings and arrays, could lead to buffer overflows. This is a classic C vulnerability that can lead to arbitrary code execution. The sds (Simple Dynamic Strings) library used by hiredis should mitigate many of these, but careful review is needed.
      • Integer Overflows: Parsing large integers from RESP could lead to integer overflows, potentially causing unexpected behavior or vulnerabilities.
      • Memory Allocation Errors: Failed memory allocations during parsing could lead to crashes or potentially exploitable conditions.
      • Format String Vulnerabilities: While less likely in this context, any use of printf-style functions with untrusted data from the Redis server could introduce format string vulnerabilities.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed Responses: An attacker who can control the Redis server (or intercept traffic) could send specially crafted RESP responses designed to cause excessive memory allocation, trigger infinite loops, or otherwise disrupt the hiredis client.

  • 2.3 Command Formatting (hiredis.c)

    • Architecture: Hiredis provides functions to format Redis commands, converting C data types into the RESP format for sending to the server.
    • Components:
      • Functions like redisCommand and redisvCommand that format commands.
      • Conversion of C data types to RESP strings.
    • Data Flow: The application provides the command and arguments. Hiredis formats them into a RESP-compliant string, which is then sent over the TCP connection.
    • Security Implications:
      • Command Injection: If user-supplied data is directly incorporated into Redis commands without proper escaping or sanitization, command injection is possible. This is primarily the responsibility of the application using hiredis, but hiredis should provide mechanisms to help prevent it. For example, if an application uses sprintf to build a command string using user input, an attacker could inject arbitrary Redis commands.
      • Buffer Overflows: Similar to the parsing stage, incorrect formatting of commands could lead to buffer overflows within hiredis.

  • 2.4 Error Handling (hiredis.c)

    • Architecture: Hiredis uses a combination of return values and error strings to indicate errors. The redisContext structure contains an err field and an errstr field.
    • Components:
      • Error codes returned by functions.
      • Error strings providing more details.
    • Data Flow: When an error occurs, hiredis sets the err and errstr fields in the redisContext. The application is responsible for checking these fields and handling the error appropriately.
    • Security Implications:
      • Information Leakage: Error messages might reveal sensitive information about the Redis server or the application's internal state.
      • Unhandled Errors: If the application doesn't properly check for and handle errors returned by hiredis, it could lead to unexpected behavior, data corruption, or vulnerabilities. For example, if a connection error is ignored, the application might continue to operate as if it's connected, leading to data loss.
      • Resource Leaks: Failure to free resources on error can lead to resource exhaustion.

3. Threat Modeling

Based on the above analysis, we can identify the following key threats:

| Threat | Description | Impact