Attack Surface: Rulebase Manipulation/Injection
- Description: Unauthorized modification or injection of rules into the
liblognorm
rulebase, allowing attackers to control log parsing and normalization. - How liblognorm Contributes:
liblognorm
's core functionality relies on user-defined rulebases. The library itself provides the mechanism for loading and applying these rules, making the rulebase a central point of control. - Example: An attacker gains write access to the rulebase file and adds a rule that replaces all instances of "CRITICAL" with "INFO" in log messages, effectively masking critical security events.
- Impact:
- Masking of malicious activity.
- Denial of service (DoS) through resource-intensive rules.
- Extraction of sensitive data.
- Triggering of incorrect alerts or actions.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- File Permissions: Implement strict file system permissions on rulebase files, allowing read-only access to the user running the
liblognorm
process and write access only to authorized administrators. - Integrity Checks: Use checksums (e.g., SHA-256) or digital signatures to verify the integrity of rulebase files before loading them. Reject any file that fails the integrity check.
- Secure Configuration Management: Employ a secure configuration management system (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet) to deploy and manage rulebases, ensuring consistent and controlled updates.
- Auditing: Enable detailed audit logging of all changes to rulebase files, including who made the changes and when.
- Input Validation (if applicable): If any part of the rulebase is influenced by user input (even indirectly), implement extremely strict input validation and sanitization. Prefer a parameterized approach over direct string construction. Never allow direct user control over rulebase content.
- Principle of Least Privilege: Run the process using
liblognorm
with the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid running as root.
- File Permissions: Implement strict file system permissions on rulebase files, allowing read-only access to the user running the
Attack Surface: Parsing Vulnerabilities (Buffer/Integer Overflows)
- Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in
liblognorm
's parsing engine, specifically buffer overflows or integer overflows, potentially leading to code execution or denial of service. - How liblognorm Contributes:
liblognorm
is responsible for parsing both the rulebase and the incoming log messages. This parsing process, especially when dealing with potentially malformed input, is inherently vulnerable to memory corruption issues. - Example: An attacker crafts a specially designed log message with an extremely long field that exceeds the buffer allocated by
liblognorm
during parsing, leading to a crash or potentially code execution. - Impact:
- Denial of service (DoS).
- Remote code execution (RCE).
- System instability.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Update Regularly: Keep
liblognorm
updated to the latest version to benefit from security patches and improvements. - Memory Safety Tools: During development and testing, use memory safety tools like AddressSanitizer (ASan), Valgrind, and fuzzing frameworks to detect and fix memory-related vulnerabilities.
- Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews of
liblognorm
's parsing and string handling code, focusing on potential buffer and integer overflow vulnerabilities. - Input Validation (Pre-liblognorm): Before passing data to
liblognorm
, perform robust input validation. This includes:- Length Limits: Enforce strict length limits on log messages and individual fields.
- Character Restrictions: Restrict the allowed character set to what is expected for the log format.
- Fuzz Testing: Use fuzz testing tools to send a wide variety of malformed and unexpected inputs to liblognorm to identify potential parsing issues.
- Update Regularly: Keep