Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
230 lines (196 loc) · 26.4 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

230 lines (196 loc) · 26.4 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Rsyslog

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the rsyslog project, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and deployment model. The analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, weaknesses, and areas for improvement, specifically within the context of rsyslog's design and implementation. This is not a generic security audit; it's tailored to rsyslog's specific functionalities and risks. We will analyze the following key components:

  • Input Modules: How rsyslog receives data.
  • Core Engine: The central processing and routing logic.
  • Filter Engine: How filtering rules are applied.
  • Output Modules: How rsyslog sends data to its destinations.
  • Configuration: The security implications of rsyslog's configuration system.
  • Build Process: Security of the build pipeline.

Scope:

This analysis covers the rsyslog software itself, its configuration, and its build process, as described in the provided security design review. It also considers the containerized deployment model using Kubernetes, as specified in the design. It does not cover the security of:

  • External systems sending logs to rsyslog (except to recommend secure protocols).
  • Log storage solutions receiving logs from rsyslog (except to recommend secure configurations).
  • The underlying operating system or Kubernetes cluster (except to recommend relevant security features).
  • Third-party libraries used by rsyslog (except to highlight the need for dependency vulnerability management).

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Component Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, documentation, and general knowledge of rsyslog, we will infer the detailed architecture and data flow within rsyslog.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each key component, we will identify potential threats based on its function, data handled, and interactions with other components. We will consider threats related to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: We will analyze the existing security controls and accepted risks to identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses.
  4. Mitigation Recommendations: For each identified threat and vulnerability, we will provide specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to rsyslog. These recommendations will be prioritized based on the severity of the risk.
  5. Focus on Rsyslog-Specific Issues: The analysis will avoid generic security advice and concentrate on issues specific to rsyslog's design and implementation.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Input Modules

  • Architecture: Input modules are pluggable components that receive log data from various sources (e.g., imudp, imtcp, imfile, imjournal, imklog). They perform initial parsing and hand off the data to the core engine.
  • Data Flow: External sources -> Input Module -> Core Engine.
  • Threats:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Malicious actors could flood input modules with a high volume of log messages, overwhelming rsyslog and potentially impacting the entire system. This is particularly relevant for UDP-based inputs (imudp), which are connectionless and lack inherent flow control. Even TCP-based inputs (imtcp) can be overwhelmed.
    • Injection Attacks: If input validation is insufficient, attackers could inject malicious code or commands into log messages, potentially exploiting vulnerabilities in the input module, core engine, or filter engine. This includes format string vulnerabilities, command injection, and other code injection techniques.
    • Authentication Bypass: If authentication is not properly enforced for network-based inputs, unauthorized sources could send log messages, potentially spoofing legitimate sources or injecting false data.
    • Data Corruption/Modification: Attackers could intercept and modify log messages in transit, particularly if unencrypted protocols (like plain UDP or TCP) are used.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Input modules that read from files (imfile) could be exploited to consume excessive disk space or file handles if they are not properly configured to handle large or rapidly growing log files.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Weak or missing input validation in specific input modules.
    • Lack of rate limiting or connection limiting for network inputs.
    • Use of insecure protocols (e.g., UDP, plain TCP) without TLS.
    • Insufficient authentication mechanisms for network inputs.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust input validation: Each input module should rigorously validate the format and content of incoming log messages, using whitelisting where possible. This should be tailored to the specific input type (e.g., syslog format, JSON, etc.). Regular expressions should be carefully crafted to avoid ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerabilities.
    • Enforce rate limiting and connection limiting: Use rsyslog's built-in rate limiting features (e.g., $imudpRatelimit.Interval, $imudpRatelimit.Burst, $MaxConnections) to mitigate DoS attacks. Configure appropriate limits based on expected log volume and system resources.
    • Mandate TLS for network inputs: Always use TLS-encrypted inputs (imtcp with TLS) for network communication. Avoid using plain UDP or TCP. Configure strong cipher suites and TLS versions (TLS 1.3 or higher).
    • Implement strong authentication: Use TLS client certificates or GSSAPI for authentication of remote log sources. Avoid relying solely on IP address-based filtering, as IP addresses can be spoofed.
    • Monitor resource usage: Monitor CPU, memory, and disk I/O usage of input modules to detect potential resource exhaustion attacks. Use rsyslog's performance statistics and monitoring tools.
    • Regularly update input modules: Keep rsyslog and its input modules up to date to benefit from security patches and vulnerability fixes.
    • Use RELP (Reliable Event Logging Protocol) where possible: RELP provides reliable delivery and flow control, mitigating some of the risks associated with UDP.
    • For imfile, use rotation and size limits: Configure log rotation and size limits to prevent excessive disk space consumption. Use rsyslog's built-in features or external tools like logrotate.
    • Fuzz test input modules: Regularly fuzz test input modules with various malformed and unexpected inputs to identify potential vulnerabilities.

2.2 Core Engine

  • Architecture: The core engine is the central processing unit of rsyslog. It manages message queues, handles threading, and coordinates the interaction between input modules, filter engine, and output modules.
  • Data Flow: Input Modules -> Core Engine -> Filter Engine -> Output Modules.
  • Threats:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): If the core engine is overwhelmed by a high volume of messages or complex processing tasks, it can become a bottleneck, leading to log message loss or delays.
    • Race Conditions: Due to its multi-threaded nature, the core engine could be vulnerable to race conditions if thread synchronization is not properly implemented. This could lead to data corruption or crashes.
    • Memory Corruption: Bugs in the core engine's memory management could lead to memory leaks, buffer overflows, or other memory corruption vulnerabilities, potentially allowing for arbitrary code execution.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Inefficient message queue handling.
    • Improper thread synchronization.
    • Memory management bugs.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Optimize message queue configuration: Tune the size and parameters of message queues (e.g., $MainMsgQueueSize, $MainMsgQueueType) to handle the expected log volume and avoid bottlenecks. Consider using disk-assisted queues for high-volume scenarios.
    • Thoroughly review and test thread synchronization: Ensure that all shared resources are properly protected by mutexes, semaphores, or other synchronization primitives. Use thread analysis tools to detect potential race conditions.
    • Use memory safety tools: Employ memory safety tools (e.g., Valgrind, AddressSanitizer) during development and testing to detect memory leaks, buffer overflows, and other memory errors.
    • Regularly update rsyslog: Keep rsyslog up to date to benefit from bug fixes and security patches related to the core engine.
    • Monitor performance: Monitor the core engine's performance metrics (e.g., queue size, processing time) to detect potential bottlenecks or performance degradation.

2.3 Filter Engine

  • Architecture: The filter engine applies user-defined rules to filter and route log messages based on their content, source, priority, and other properties. Rsyslog supports various filter types (e.g., property-based filters, expression-based filters, RainerScript filters).
  • Data Flow: Core Engine -> Filter Engine -> Output Modules.
  • Threats:
    • Filter Bypass: Attackers could craft malicious log messages that bypass intended filtering rules, potentially allowing sensitive data to be logged or routed to unauthorized destinations.
    • Injection Attacks: If filter rules are constructed using untrusted input, attackers could inject malicious code or commands into the filter engine, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. This is particularly relevant for RainerScript filters, which allow for more complex logic.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Complex or poorly optimized filter rules could consume excessive CPU resources, leading to performance degradation or DoS. ReDoS vulnerabilities in regular expressions used in filters are a specific concern.
    • Logic Errors: Incorrectly configured filter rules could lead to unintended routing of log messages, potentially causing data loss or exposure.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Weak or missing input validation in filter rule construction.
    • Use of unsafe functions or constructs in RainerScript filters.
    • ReDoS vulnerabilities in regular expressions used in filters.
    • Logic errors in filter rule configuration.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Validate filter rule input: If filter rules are constructed dynamically based on user input, rigorously validate and sanitize that input to prevent injection attacks.
    • Use parameterized filters: Avoid constructing filter rules by concatenating strings with untrusted input. Use parameterized filters or other safe methods for incorporating dynamic values into filter rules.
    • Carefully review RainerScript filters: Thoroughly review and test RainerScript filters for potential security vulnerabilities, particularly if they involve complex logic or external data. Avoid using unsafe functions.
    • Test regular expressions for ReDoS: Use ReDoS testing tools to identify and mitigate potential ReDoS vulnerabilities in regular expressions used in filters. Use simpler, less complex regular expressions whenever possible.
    • Thoroughly test filter rules: Test filter rules with a wide range of inputs to ensure they behave as expected and do not have unintended consequences. Use a test environment that mirrors the production environment.
    • Monitor filter engine performance: Monitor the CPU usage and processing time of the filter engine to detect potential performance bottlenecks or DoS attacks.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Design filters to be as specific as possible. Avoid overly broad filters that might inadvertently match unintended messages.

2.4 Output Modules

  • Architecture: Output modules are responsible for sending log messages to their final destinations (e.g., files, remote servers, databases). Like input modules, they are pluggable components (e.g., omfile, omtcp, omrelp, omelasticsearch).
  • Data Flow: Filter Engine -> Output Modules -> Destination.
  • Threats:
    • Data Leakage: If log messages are sent to unauthorized or insecure destinations, sensitive data could be exposed.
    • Data Modification: Attackers could intercept and modify log messages in transit, particularly if unencrypted protocols are used.
    • Authentication Bypass: If authentication is not properly enforced for network-based outputs, attackers could send log messages to unauthorized destinations.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Output modules that write to files (omfile) could be exploited to consume excessive disk space or file handles.
    • Injection Attacks (Destination-Specific): Depending on the specific output module and destination, there might be opportunities for injection attacks. For example, an omelasticsearch module might be vulnerable to Elasticsearch injection attacks if the log data is not properly sanitized.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Use of insecure protocols (e.g., plain TCP) without TLS.
    • Insufficient authentication mechanisms for network outputs.
    • Lack of output validation or sanitization.
    • Improper handling of errors or failures in output modules.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandate TLS for network outputs: Always use TLS-encrypted outputs (omtcp with TLS, omrelp) for network communication. Configure strong cipher suites and TLS versions (TLS 1.3 or higher).
    • Implement strong authentication: Use TLS client certificates, GSSAPI, or other appropriate authentication mechanisms for network outputs.
    • Validate and sanitize output data: Depending on the specific output module and destination, validate and sanitize the log data before sending it. This is particularly important for outputs that interact with databases or other structured data stores.
    • Implement proper error handling: Output modules should handle errors and failures gracefully, without crashing or leaking sensitive information. Implement retry mechanisms and fallback options where appropriate.
    • Monitor output module performance: Monitor the performance of output modules to detect potential bottlenecks or failures.
    • For omfile, use rotation and size limits: Configure log rotation and size limits to prevent excessive disk space consumption. Use rsyslog's built-in features or external tools like logrotate.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Configure output modules with the minimum necessary permissions to write to their destinations.

2.5 Configuration

  • Architecture: Rsyslog's configuration is typically stored in one or more text files (e.g., /etc/rsyslog.conf, /etc/rsyslog.d/*). The configuration defines input sources, filter rules, output destinations, and other settings.
  • Threats:
    • Unauthorized Configuration Modification: If attackers gain write access to the configuration files, they could modify rsyslog's behavior, potentially disabling security controls, redirecting logs to unauthorized destinations, or injecting malicious code.
    • Information Disclosure: If the configuration files contain sensitive information (e.g., passwords, API keys) and are not properly protected, attackers could gain access to that information.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers could modify the configuration to cause rsyslog to consume excessive resources or crash.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Weak file permissions on configuration files.
    • Lack of access control to prevent unauthorized modification of configuration files.
    • Storage of sensitive information in plain text in configuration files.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Restrict file permissions: Set strict file permissions on configuration files (e.g., 640 or 600) to prevent unauthorized access. The owner should be root (or a dedicated rsyslog user), and the group should be a restricted group (e.g., adm or rsyslog).
    • Use a configuration management system: Manage rsyslog configuration using a configuration management system (e.g., Ansible, Puppet, Chef) to ensure consistency, enforce security policies, and track changes.
    • Avoid storing sensitive information in plain text: Do not store passwords, API keys, or other sensitive information directly in configuration files. Use environment variables, a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, Kubernetes Secrets), or rsyslog's built-in support for external programs to retrieve sensitive data.
    • Implement change control and auditing: Track all changes to configuration files and implement a review process for any modifications. Use version control (e.g., Git) to manage configuration files.
    • Regularly audit configuration files: Periodically review configuration files for security misconfigurations, outdated settings, and potential vulnerabilities.
    • SELinux/AppArmor: Use mandatory access control systems like SELinux or AppArmor to further restrict rsyslog's access to configuration files and other system resources.

2.6 Build Process

  • Architecture: The build process, as described, involves code review, SAST, dependency checking, and signed releases.
  • Threats:
    • Compromised Build Server: If the build server is compromised, attackers could inject malicious code into the rsyslog binaries or modify the build process to introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerable Dependencies: Rsyslog relies on external libraries, which may contain vulnerabilities. If these vulnerabilities are not identified and addressed, they could be exploited in the final product.
    • Tampered Build Artifacts: If the artifact repository is compromised, attackers could replace legitimate build artifacts with malicious ones.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers could compromise the build tools or dependencies themselves, injecting malicious code that is then incorporated into rsyslog.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Weak security controls on the build server.
    • Outdated or vulnerable build tools and dependencies.
    • Lack of integrity checks on build artifacts.
    • Insufficient supply chain security measures.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Harden the build server: Implement strong security controls on the build server, including access control, intrusion detection, and regular security updates.
    • Use a secure artifact repository: Store build artifacts in a secure artifact repository with access control and integrity checks.
    • Verify the integrity of build tools and dependencies: Use checksums, digital signatures, or other mechanisms to verify the integrity of build tools and dependencies before using them.
    • Implement software bill of materials (SBOM): Generate and maintain an SBOM for rsyslog to track all dependencies and their versions.
    • Regularly update build tools and dependencies: Keep build tools and dependencies up to date to benefit from security patches and vulnerability fixes.
    • Use a reproducible build process: Implement a reproducible build process to ensure that the same source code always produces the same build artifacts. This helps to detect tampering and ensures consistency.
    • Consider using in-toto: Explore using in-toto, a framework for securing software supply chains, to verify the integrity of the build process and artifacts.

3. Deployment (Kubernetes) Specific Considerations

The chosen deployment model using Kubernetes introduces additional security considerations:

  • Threats:
    • Container Breakout: Attackers could exploit vulnerabilities in rsyslog or the container runtime to escape the container and gain access to the host system or other containers.
    • Compromised Container Image: If the rsyslog container image is compromised, attackers could gain control of the rsyslog process.
    • Network Attacks: Attackers could exploit network vulnerabilities to intercept or modify log traffic between application containers and the rsyslog container, or between the rsyslog container and external systems.
    • Unauthorized Access to ConfigMap: Attackers could gain access to the ConfigMap and modify the rsyslog configuration.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Running rsyslog container as root.
    • Using a vulnerable base image for the rsyslog container.
    • Lack of network policies to restrict traffic to and from the rsyslog pod.
    • Insufficient RBAC controls to limit access to Kubernetes resources.
    • Not using a secrets management solution for sensitive configuration data.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Run rsyslog container as non-root: Create a dedicated user account within the container and run the rsyslog process as that user. Avoid running as root.
    • Use a minimal and secure base image: Use a minimal base image (e.g., Alpine Linux, distroless images) for the rsyslog container to reduce the attack surface. Regularly scan the container image for vulnerabilities.
    • Implement network policies: Use Kubernetes network policies to restrict network traffic to and from the rsyslog pod. Allow only necessary traffic from application containers and to authorized external destinations.
    • Use RBAC: Implement role-based access control (RBAC) to limit access to Kubernetes resources, including the rsyslog pod, ConfigMap, and namespace.
    • Use a secrets management solution: Store sensitive configuration data (e.g., passwords, API keys) in a secrets management solution (e.g., Kubernetes Secrets, HashiCorp Vault) and inject them into the rsyslog container as environment variables or mounted files.
    • Use pod security policies (or pod security admission): Define pod security policies (or use the newer pod security admission controller) to enforce security best practices for the rsyslog pod, such as preventing privilege escalation, restricting access to host resources, and requiring the use of a read-only root filesystem.
    • Enable audit logging for Kubernetes: Enable audit logging for the Kubernetes cluster to track all API requests and identify potential security breaches.
    • Regularly update Kubernetes and container runtime: Keep Kubernetes and the container runtime (e.g., containerd, CRI-O) up to date to benefit from security patches and vulnerability fixes.
    • Use a sidecar container for TLS termination: Consider using a sidecar container (e.g., Envoy, Nginx) for TLS termination and authentication, rather than handling TLS directly within the rsyslog container. This can simplify configuration and improve security.

4. Prioritized Recommendations

The following recommendations are prioritized based on their potential impact and ease of implementation:

High Priority:

  1. Mandate TLS for all network communication (input and output): This is the most critical step to protect the confidentiality and integrity of log data in transit.
  2. Implement strong authentication for all network connections: Use TLS client certificates or GSSAPI to authenticate remote log sources and destinations.
  3. Implement robust input validation in all input modules: This is crucial to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Run rsyslog container as non-root (Kubernetes deployment): This significantly reduces the impact of potential container breakout vulnerabilities.
  5. Use a minimal and secure base image for the rsyslog container (Kubernetes deployment): This reduces the attack surface of the container.
  6. Implement network policies to restrict traffic to and from the rsyslog pod (Kubernetes deployment): This limits the potential for network-based attacks.
  7. Restrict file permissions on configuration files: This prevents unauthorized modification of rsyslog's configuration.
  8. Regularly update rsyslog, its dependencies, build tools, Kubernetes, and the container runtime: This ensures that you are protected against known vulnerabilities.

Medium Priority:

  1. Implement rate limiting and connection limiting for network inputs: This mitigates DoS attacks.
  2. Use a configuration management system to manage rsyslog configuration: This ensures consistency and enforces security policies.
  3. Avoid storing sensitive information in plain text in configuration files: Use environment variables, a secrets management solution, or rsyslog's built-in support for external programs.
  4. Thoroughly review and test RainerScript filters for security vulnerabilities: This is particularly important if they involve complex logic or external data.
  5. Test regular expressions for ReDoS vulnerabilities: This prevents DoS attacks targeting the filter engine.
  6. Use RBAC to limit access to Kubernetes resources (Kubernetes deployment): This restricts the potential damage from compromised credentials.
  7. Use pod security policies (or pod security admission) (Kubernetes deployment): This enforces security best practices for the rsyslog pod.
  8. Implement a reproducible build process: This helps to detect tampering and ensures consistency.
  9. Generate and maintain an SBOM for rsyslog: This helps to track dependencies and their vulnerabilities.

Low Priority:

  1. Use RELP where possible: This provides more reliable log delivery than UDP.
  2. Monitor rsyslog's performance and resource usage: This helps to detect potential DoS attacks or performance bottlenecks.
  3. Regularly audit configuration files and the build process: This helps to identify security misconfigurations and potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider using in-toto for securing the software supply chain: This provides a more comprehensive approach to supply chain security.
  5. Use a sidecar container for TLS termination (Kubernetes deployment): This can simplify configuration and improve security.
  6. Enable audit logging for Kubernetes (Kubernetes deployment): This provides an audit trail for security investigations.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for rsyslog, covering its key components, architecture, deployment model, and build process. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, organizations can significantly improve the security posture of their rsyslog deployments and protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of their log data. Remember to tailor the recommendations to your specific environment and risk profile.