Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
124 lines (102 loc) · 12.1 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

124 lines (102 loc) · 12.1 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for skywind3000/kcp

Objective: Compromise Application Using KCP

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application Using KCP [CRITICAL NODE]
├── Exploit KCP Protocol Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├── Replay Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └── Capture and Re-transmit KCP Packets
│   ├── Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (If Encryption Not Used or Weak) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE if encryption is weak/absent]
│   │   ├── Passive Eavesdropping [HIGH-RISK PATH if encryption is weak/absent]
│   │   │   └── Intercept and Decrypt (if possible) KCP Traffic
│   │   ├── Active Interception and Modification [HIGH-RISK PATH if encryption is weak/absent]
│   │   │   ├── Modify KCP Packets in Transit
│   │   │   └── Inject Malicious KCP Packets
│   ├── Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├── KCP Protocol Level DoS [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├── Packet Flooding [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   └── Send High Volume of KCP Packets to Overwhelm Resources
│   │   │   ├── State Exhaustion Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   └── Exploit KCP Connection State Management to Exhaust Server Resources
├── Exploit KCP Implementation Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├── Memory Safety Issues (C/C++ Code) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]
│   │   ├── Buffer Overflows [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]
│   │   │   └── Send Crafted KCP Packets to Overflow Buffers in KCP Library
│   │   ├── Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]
│   │   │   └── Trigger Use-After-Free conditions in KCP Memory Management
│   │   ├── Integer Overflows/Underflows [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]
│   │   │   └── Exploit Integer Handling in KCP Packet Processing
├── Exploit Misconfiguration of KCP [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├── Disabled or Weak Encryption [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   └── Application Deploys KCP without Encryption or with Weak Ciphers
│   ├── Incorrect Parameter Tuning [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├── Improper RTO/Interval Settings
│   │   │   └── Configure KCP with overly aggressive or lenient retransmission timers
│   │   ├── Large Window Sizes without Proper Congestion Control
│   │   │   └── Configure KCP with excessively large window sizes, leading to congestion
├── Exploit Integration Issues with Application Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├── Data Injection via KCP [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └── Inject Malicious Data Payloads within KCP Packets
│   ├── Lack of Proper Input Sanitization After KCP Decryption/Decompression [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └── Application Fails to Sanitize Data Received via KCP Before Processing

Attack Tree Path: Compromise Application Using KCP [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the root goal of the attacker. Success at any of the child nodes can lead to achieving this goal. It's critical because it represents the overall objective and highlights the importance of securing the application using KCP.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit KCP Protocol Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This node represents a category of attacks that exploit inherent limitations or design choices within the KCP protocol itself. It's critical because protocol-level weaknesses can be fundamental and harder to mitigate without application-level countermeasures.

    • Child Nodes (High-Risk Paths): Replay Attacks, MitM Attacks (if encryption weak/absent), Denial of Service Attacks.

    • Attack Vectors within this node:

      • Replay Attacks - Capture and Re-transmit KCP Packets [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

        • Vector: Attacker captures valid KCP packets in transit and re-sends them to the application.
        • Impact: Data duplication, re-execution of commands, potentially leading to unintended actions or data manipulation within the application.
        • Mitigation: Implement application-level replay protection using sequence numbers, timestamps, or nonces in application messages.

      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (If Encryption Not Used or Weak) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE if encryption is weak/absent]:

        • Vector: Attacker intercepts KCP traffic between client and server. If encryption is absent or weak, they can eavesdrop, modify, or inject packets.
        • Impact:
          • Passive Eavesdropping - Intercept and Decrypt (if possible) KCP Traffic [HIGH-RISK PATH if encryption is weak/absent]: Data breach, exposure of sensitive information transmitted over KCP.
          • Active Interception and Modification [HIGH-RISK PATH if encryption is weak/absent]: Data corruption, command injection, control flow manipulation by modifying or injecting KCP packets.
        • Mitigation: Mandatory Strong Encryption: Always use robust encryption for KCP communication. Implement mutual authentication to prevent unauthorized endpoints.

      • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:

        • Vector: Attacker overwhelms the application or network resources by exploiting KCP protocol characteristics.
        • Impact: Service unavailability, resource exhaustion, preventing legitimate users from accessing the application.
        • Types (High-Risk Paths):
          • KCP Protocol Level DoS - Packet Flooding - Send High Volume of KCP Packets to Overwhelm Resources [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Flooding the server with a large number of KCP packets.
          • KCP Protocol Level DoS - State Exhaustion Attacks - Exploit KCP Connection State Management to Exhaust Server Resources [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Initiating many connections or manipulating connection states to exhaust server resources.
        • Mitigation: Implement rate limiting, traffic shaping, connection limits, resource quotas, and robust connection state management. Use firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit KCP Implementation Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This node represents attacks that exploit bugs or flaws in the implementation of the KCP library itself (specifically the C/C++ implementation). It's critical because vulnerabilities in the underlying library can have widespread impact on all applications using it.

    • Child Nodes (High-Risk Paths if vulnerabilities exist): Memory Safety Issues (Buffer Overflows, Use-After-Free, Integer Overflows/Underflows).

    • Attack Vectors within this node (if vulnerabilities exist):

      • Memory Safety Issues (C/C++ Code) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]:
        • Vector: Attacker sends crafted KCP packets designed to trigger memory corruption vulnerabilities in the KCP library.
        • Impact:
          • Buffer Overflows - Send Crafted KCP Packets to Overflow Buffers in KCP Library [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]: Code execution, denial of service, memory corruption.
          • Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities - Trigger Use-After-Free conditions in KCP Memory Management [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]: Code execution, denial of service, memory corruption.
          • Integer Overflows/Underflows - Exploit Integer Handling in KCP Packet Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH if vulnerabilities exist]: Unexpected behavior, potential memory corruption.
        • Mitigation: Thorough code audits, static analysis, fuzzing, and use of memory sanitizers during development and testing of the KCP library. Regularly update to patched versions of KCP.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Misconfiguration of KCP [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This node represents attacks that exploit improper or insecure configuration of KCP when deployed with the application. Misconfiguration is a common source of vulnerabilities.

    • Child Nodes (High-Risk Paths): Disabled or Weak Encryption, Incorrect Parameter Tuning (Improper RTO/Interval, Large Window Sizes).

    • Attack Vectors within this node:

      • Disabled or Weak Encryption - Application Deploys KCP without Encryption or with Weak Ciphers [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:

        • Vector: Application is configured to use KCP without encryption or with easily breakable encryption.
        • Impact: MitM attacks become trivial, leading to eavesdropping, data breaches, and manipulation.
        • Mitigation: Enforce Strong Encryption: Mandate and verify strong encryption is enabled and correctly configured.

      • Incorrect Parameter Tuning [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

        • Vector: KCP parameters are incorrectly tuned, leading to performance or security issues.
        • Impact:
          • Improper RTO/Interval Settings - Configure KCP with overly aggressive or lenient retransmission timers: Performance degradation, DoS, unreliability due to excessive retransmissions or delays.
          • Large Window Sizes without Proper Congestion Control - Configure KCP with excessively large window sizes, leading to congestion: Network congestion, performance degradation, DoS.
        • Mitigation: Provide secure default parameter settings, offer clear guidelines for tuning based on network conditions, and monitor network performance to detect misconfigurations.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Integration Issues with Application Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This node represents attacks that exploit vulnerabilities arising from how the application integrates with KCP, specifically in handling data received via KCP. It's critical because even a secure KCP setup can be undermined by insecure application-level handling of data.

    • Child Nodes (High-Risk Paths): Data Injection via KCP, Lack of Proper Input Sanitization After KCP Decryption/Decompression.

    • Attack Vectors within this node:

      • Data Injection via KCP - Inject Malicious Data Payloads within KCP Packets [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

        • Vector: Attacker injects malicious data payloads within KCP packets, hoping the application will process them without proper validation.
        • Impact: Application logic bypass, command injection, data corruption, depending on how the application processes the data.
        • Mitigation: Input Sanitization at Application Level: Treat all data received via KCP as untrusted. Implement robust input sanitization and validation at the application level before processing.

      • Lack of Proper Input Sanitization After KCP Decryption/Decompression - Application Fails to Sanitize Data Received via KCP Before Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

        • Vector: Application receives data via KCP, which might be decrypted or decompressed by KCP, but the application fails to sanitize this data before using it.
        • Impact: Application-level vulnerabilities such as command injection, SQL injection (if applicable), XSS (if used in a web context), etc., become exploitable.
        • Mitigation: Post-Processing Sanitization: Ensure data is sanitized and validated after KCP decryption/decompression, before it is used by the application logic. This is crucial to prevent application-level vulnerabilities.