Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
160 lines (117 loc) · 11.2 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

160 lines (117 loc) · 11.2 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for timescale/timescaledb

Mitigation Strategy: Optimized Chunk Sizing

1. Mitigation Strategy: Optimized Chunk Sizing

  • Description:

    1. Analyze Data Ingestion: Determine the data ingestion rate (rows/second, MB/hour) to your TimescaleDB hypertables.
    2. Analyze Query Patterns: Identify common query time ranges (e.g., last hour, last day) used in WHERE clauses on your hypertables.
    3. Initial Chunk Size Calculation: Use TimescaleDB documentation and timescaledb-tune (if applicable) to calculate an initial chunk_time_interval. Aim for chunks that cover frequently queried periods.
    4. Staging Environment Testing: Test different chunk_time_interval values in a staging environment with a representative dataset and workload.
    5. Iterative Testing and Adjustment: Iteratively adjust the chunk_time_interval in staging, monitoring performance metrics (query execution time, resource utilization).
    6. Production Deployment and Monitoring: Deploy the chosen chunk_time_interval to production. Continuously monitor chunk-related metrics and adjust as needed.
    7. Regular Review: Schedule regular reviews (e.g., monthly) of chunk sizes to adapt to changing data volume and query patterns.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Degradation (Severity: High): Improper chunk sizes lead to slow queries.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Excessively large chunks can cause resource-intensive queries, leading to DoS.
    • Increased Storage Costs (Severity: Medium): Too-small chunks increase metadata overhead and storage costs.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Degradation: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Substantially reduces risk (risk reduction: High).
    • Increased Storage Costs: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Initial calculation done, but ongoing monitoring and adjustment are not fully automated. Implemented in create_hypertable calls.

  • Missing Implementation: Automated monitoring and alerting for chunk metrics. Regular, scheduled chunk size reviews.

Mitigation Strategy: Continuous Aggregate Optimization

2. Mitigation Strategy: Continuous Aggregate Optimization

  • Description:

    1. Identify Essential Aggregates: List all continuous aggregates. Remove unused or redundant ones.
    2. Analyze Aggregate Complexity: Examine SQL definitions for overly complex calculations. Simplify where possible.
    3. Optimize Refresh Policies: Determine the appropriate refresh_interval and refresh_lag for each aggregate, considering data freshness requirements, recomputation cost, and query frequency.
    4. Staging Environment Testing: Test different refresh policies in a staging environment, monitoring performance.
    5. Materialized View Hygiene: Regularly (e.g., monthly) review and optimize/remove poorly performing or unnecessary aggregates.
    6. Monitoring: Implement monitoring for refresh times, resource consumption, and errors during materialization. Set up alerts.
    7. Access Control: Restrict create/modify/drop permissions for continuous aggregates to database administrators.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Degradation (Severity: High): Inefficient aggregates consume resources and slow down queries.
    • Data Inconsistency (Severity: Medium): Incorrect refresh policies lead to stale/inaccurate data.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Severity: High): Overly complex/frequent aggregates can exhaust resources.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Degradation: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).
    • Data Inconsistency: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).
    • Resource Exhaustion: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).

  • Currently Implemented: Basic aggregates implemented. Refresh policies set based on initial estimates. Implemented in database migration scripts.

  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive monitoring and alerting. Regular review and optimization. Strict access control.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Data Retention Policies

3. Mitigation Strategy: Robust Data Retention Policies

  • Description:

    1. Define Retention Requirements: Document retention requirements based on business needs, legal obligations, and compliance.
    2. Implement drop_chunks: Use drop_chunks with the older_than parameter to implement policies.
    3. Staging Environment Testing: Thoroughly test drop_chunks in staging to verify correct data deletion.
    4. Backup and Recovery: Implement a robust backup/recovery strategy independent of TimescaleDB retention. Include regular full/incremental backups, stored offsite. Test recovery regularly.
    5. Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor drop_chunks execution. Set up alerts for failures. Log operations for auditing.
    6. Regular Review: Periodically (e.g., annually) review and update retention policies.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Loss (Severity: High): Incorrect policies can lead to accidental data deletion.
    • Excessive Storage Consumption (Severity: Medium): Keeping data longer than necessary increases costs and impacts performance.
    • Compliance Violations (Severity: High): Failing to comply with retention regulations can result in penalties.

  • Impact:

    • Data Loss: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).
    • Excessive Storage Consumption: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).
    • Compliance Violations: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).

  • Currently Implemented: Basic policies implemented with drop_chunks. Backups performed regularly. Implemented in database maintenance and backup procedures.

  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive monitoring/alerting for drop_chunks. Consistent testing of backup/recovery. Formal review of policies.

Mitigation Strategy: TimescaleDB Extension Updates

4. Mitigation Strategy: TimescaleDB Extension Updates

  • Description:

    1. Monitor Release Notes: Regularly monitor TimescaleDB release notes and security advisories.
    2. Staging Environment Testing: Test new versions in a staging environment before production deployment.
    3. Scheduled Updates: Schedule regular updates as part of routine maintenance.
    4. Rollback Plan: Have a rollback plan in case of update issues.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (Severity: High): Updates patch security vulnerabilities.
    • Data Corruption (Severity: High): Vulnerabilities could lead to data corruption (rare).
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High): Vulnerabilities could be exploited for DoS.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).
    • Data Corruption: Reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium to High).
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium to High).

  • Currently Implemented: Updates performed occasionally, not regularly scheduled. Staging testing sometimes performed.

  • Missing Implementation: Formal update schedule. Consistent staging testing. Documented rollback plan.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Compression Configuration

5. Mitigation Strategy: Secure Compression Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Data Analysis: Analyze data types and characteristics to determine the best compression algorithm.
    2. Algorithm Selection: Choose the appropriate algorithm (e.g., Gorilla, delta-delta, dictionary) based on analysis.
    3. segmentby Optimization: Carefully choose segmentby columns, favoring those frequently used in WHERE clauses.
    4. Staging Environment Testing: Test different settings (algorithm, segmentby) in staging, measuring storage savings, query performance, and data ingestion rate.
    5. Production Deployment and Monitoring: Deploy to production. Monitor compression ratios and query performance.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Degradation (Severity: Medium): Incorrect settings can slow down queries.
    • Increased Storage Costs (Severity: Low): Improper configuration can negate storage benefits.
    • Data Corruption (Severity: Very Low): Bugs in algorithms could potentially cause corruption (extremely unlikely).

  • Impact:

    • Performance Degradation: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).
    • Increased Storage Costs: Slightly reduces risk (risk reduction: Low).
    • Data Corruption: Minimally reduces risk (risk reduction: Very Low).

  • Currently Implemented: Compression enabled on some hypertables, but configuration not thoroughly tested/optimized.

  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive data analysis and staging testing. Ongoing monitoring of ratios and performance.

Mitigation Strategy: Responsible TimescaleDB Toolkit Usage

6. Mitigation Strategy: Responsible TimescaleDB Toolkit Usage

  • Description:

    1. Function Inventory: List all TimescaleDB Toolkit functions used.
    2. Necessity Review: Determine if each function is essential. Remove unnecessary ones.
    3. Security Review: Examine usage for potential security risks, especially with user input.
    4. Input Validation: Implement rigorous input validation/sanitization for functions using user input.
    5. Staging Environment Testing: Thoroughly test functionality and performance with Toolkit functions in staging.
    6. Regular Updates: Keep the TimescaleDB Toolkit extension updated.
    7. Monitoring: Monitor usage and performance of Toolkit functions.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Degradation (Severity: Medium): Inefficient use can slow queries.
    • SQL Injection (Severity: High): Unvalidated user input can lead to SQL injection.
    • Data Exposure (Severity: Medium): Vulnerabilities could lead to unauthorized access.
    • Denial of Service (Severity: Medium): Resource-intensive functions could be exploited for DoS.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Degradation: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).
    • SQL Injection: Significantly reduces risk (risk reduction: High).
    • Data Exposure: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).
    • Denial of Service: Moderately reduces risk (risk reduction: Medium).

  • Currently Implemented: Toolkit installed, but usage not systematically reviewed/monitored.

  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive function inventory. Consistent input validation. Regular security reviews and performance monitoring.