Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
113 lines (88 loc) · 9.15 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

113 lines (88 loc) · 9.15 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for twitter/twemproxy

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Configuration Management and Validation (Twemproxy-Specific Aspects)

  • Description:

    1. Version Control: Store the nutcracker.yml file (and any other relevant configuration files) in a Git repository. Create branches for new features or changes, and use pull requests to review and merge changes.
    2. Automated Validation (Pre-Deployment):
      • Schema Validation: If a formal schema definition exists for the nutcracker.yml format, use a schema validator (e.g., a YAML validator with a custom schema) to ensure the file is syntactically correct.
      • Connectivity Tests: Create a script that parses the nutcracker.yml file, extracts the server addresses and ports, and attempts to establish a TCP connection to each backend server. This script should be run automatically as part of the deployment process.
      • Linting/Static Analysis: Develop custom scripts (e.g., using Python, Bash) or use existing linting tools to check for common configuration errors specific to Twemproxy:
        • Duplicate server entries.
        • Inconsistent hashing algorithms across server pools.
        • Incorrect server weights.
        • Missing required parameters.
        • Invalid port numbers.
        • Unsupported configuration options for the specific Twemproxy version.
    3. Least Privilege: Create a dedicated, unprivileged user account (e.g., twemproxy) on the operating system. Configure Twemproxy to run under this user account. This limits the potential damage if Twemproxy is compromised. This is a direct configuration of how Twemproxy is run.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Configuration Errors Leading to Data Exposure (High Severity): Incorrect server addresses or routing rules within nutcracker.yml could expose sensitive data.
    • Configuration Errors Leading to Service Disruption (High Severity): Invalid nutcracker.yml configuration can prevent Twemproxy from starting or cause it to malfunction.
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes (Medium Severity): Without version control, unauthorized changes to nutcracker.yml could lead to instability.
    • Privilege Escalation (if Twemproxy runs as root, High Severity): If Twemproxy is compromised and running as root, the attacker gains full control.

  • Impact:

    • Configuration Errors (Data Exposure/Service Disruption): Risk reduced from high to low (with thorough validation).
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes: Risk reduced from medium to low (with version control).
    • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced from high to low (by running as an unprivileged user).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • nutcracker.yml stored in a Git repository.
    • Basic manual review of configuration changes.
    • Twemproxy runs as a dedicated user (twemproxy).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated validation scripts (schema validation, connectivity tests, linting).

Mitigation Strategy: Twemproxy's Built-in Limits (If Available)

  • Description:

    1. Version Check: Consult the documentation for your specific Twemproxy version. Not all versions support the same features.
    2. client_connections: If supported, configure the client_connections parameter in nutcracker.yml to limit the maximum number of concurrent client connections that Twemproxy will accept. This helps prevent resource exhaustion.
    3. timeout: Set appropriate timeout values in nutcracker.yml for:
      • Client Connections: How long Twemproxy will wait for a client to send a request before closing the connection.
      • Backend Server Connections: How long Twemproxy will wait for a backend server to respond before considering it unavailable. This helps prevent slowloris-type attacks and handles slow or unresponsive backend servers.
    4. Other Limits: Explore the documentation for any other relevant configuration options that might limit resource usage or improve security (e.g., request size limits, if available).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks (High Severity): Attackers can flood Twemproxy with requests. Built-in limits provide a basic level of protection.
    • Slowloris Attacks (Medium Severity): Attackers can establish many slow connections. Appropriate timeouts are crucial.

  • Impact:

    • DoS Attacks: Risk reduced from high to medium (limited effectiveness compared to external rate limiting).
    • Slowloris Attacks: Risk reduced from medium to low (with appropriate timeouts).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic timeout settings configured in Twemproxy.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • client_connections limit (if supported by the Twemproxy version).
    • Review and optimization of all timeout settings.

Mitigation Strategy: Careful Server Pool Configuration (Within nutcracker.yml)

  • Description:

    1. Thorough Review: Before deploying any changes to the nutcracker.yml file, carefully review the servers section for each server pool. Pay close attention to:
      • Server Addresses and Ports: Ensure they are correct and point to the intended backend servers.
      • Weights: Verify that the weights assigned to each server are appropriate for the desired distribution of traffic.
      • Distribution Algorithm: Confirm that the chosen distribution algorithm (e.g., ketama, modula, random) is suitable for your use case and that it's consistently applied.
      • Server Names: Use descriptive server names to avoid confusion.
      • redis or memcache: Ensure that the correct protocol is specified for each backend server.
      • server_connections: If supported, consider limiting the number of connections Twemproxy establishes to each backend server.
    2. Testing (using a test instance of Twemproxy): Before deploying to production, thoroughly test the Twemproxy configuration with realistic workloads, specifically focusing on data routing. Use a testing environment that mirrors the production environment as closely as possible. Verify that:
      • Requests are being routed to the correct server pools.
      • The distribution of traffic across servers within each pool matches the configured weights.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Leakage Due to Misconfigured Server Pools (High Severity): Routing requests to the wrong backend server could expose sensitive data.
    • Service Degradation Due to Misconfigured Server Pools (Medium Severity): Incorrect weights or distribution algorithms can lead to uneven load distribution.
    • Data Corruption (High Severity): Writing data to the wrong backend server can lead to data corruption.

  • Impact:

    • Data Leakage/Corruption: Risk reduced from high to low (with careful configuration and thorough testing).
    • Service Degradation: Risk reduced from medium to low (with correct configuration).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic manual review of server pool configuration.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive testing of the Twemproxy configuration before deployment to production, specifically focused on data routing.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Twemproxy Updates

  • Description:

    1. Stay Informed: Subscribe to the Twemproxy mailing list (if available) or regularly check the Twemproxy GitHub repository for new releases and security advisories.
    2. Establish a Patching Schedule: Create a regular schedule for updating Twemproxy (e.g., monthly or quarterly). This should be part of your overall system patching process.
    3. Test Before Deploying: Before deploying a new version of Twemproxy itself to production, thoroughly test it in a staging environment. This is crucial to ensure compatibility with your application and backend servers. The staging environment should mirror the production environment as closely as possible.
    4. Rollback Plan: Have a plan in place to quickly roll back to the previous version of Twemproxy if the new version causes problems. This might involve restoring from a backup or using a blue/green deployment strategy.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated Twemproxy versions are more likely to have known vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced from high to low (by staying up-to-date).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Ad-hoc updates when major issues are reported.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal patching schedule.
    • Automated testing of new Twemproxy versions in a staging environment.
    • Rollback plan.