Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
124 lines (99 loc) · 11.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

124 lines (99 loc) · 11.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for vurtun/nuklear

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation and Sanitization (Nuklear Context)

Description:

  1. Identify All Input Points: Create a comprehensive list of all Nuklear widgets used in the application that accept user input (text fields, sliders, buttons, dropdowns, etc.).
  2. Define Expected Input: For each input point, define the exact expected data type (integer, float, string), range (minimum/maximum values), and allowed characters (whitelist preferred, blacklist if absolutely necessary and carefully considered).
  3. Pre-Nuklear Filtering: Implement a layer of code before any input reaches Nuklear's nk_input_* functions. This layer performs:
    • Type Checking: Verify that the input data matches the expected type. Use strong typing where possible (e.g., int instead of void*).
    • Range Checking: If the input is numeric, ensure it falls within the defined minimum and maximum values.
    • Length Limiting: For strings, enforce a maximum length before passing the data to Nuklear. This length should be based on the specific widget and its intended use.
    • Character Filtering: Apply the whitelist or blacklist (if used) to remove or reject any invalid characters.
  4. Widget-Specific Validation: Within the code handling each Nuklear widget, add additional validation after receiving input from Nuklear functions (e.g., nk_edit_string). This handles cases where Nuklear might have performed some initial processing. This is a defense-in-depth measure.
  5. Error Handling: Implement robust error handling for invalid input. Do not simply ignore invalid input. Instead, either reject the input, provide user feedback (e.g., an error message), or sanitize the input to a safe default value (with careful consideration of the security implications).
  6. Regular Expression (Regex) Validation (If Applicable): For complex string patterns, use well-tested and anchored regular expressions to validate the input format. Avoid overly complex or vulnerable regex patterns.
  7. Testing: Thoroughly test the input validation with both valid and invalid inputs, including boundary conditions and edge cases. Use fuzzing techniques to test for unexpected input.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Buffer Overflows (Severity: Critical): By enforcing strict length limits and type checking, we prevent attackers from injecting excessively long strings or unexpected data types that could cause buffer overflows within Nuklear or the application's memory.
  • Code Injection (Severity: Critical): If the application uses Nuklear input to generate code (e.g., scripting), strict input validation prevents attackers from injecting malicious code.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: High): If Nuklear is used in a web context (e.g., compiled to WebAssembly), input validation helps prevent XSS attacks, although output encoding is also crucial. This is less common but possible.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Medium): By limiting input length and complexity, we reduce the risk of an attacker causing excessive resource consumption through malicious input.
  • Logic Errors (Severity: Variable): Input validation helps prevent unexpected application behavior caused by invalid input, which could lead to security vulnerabilities.

Impact:

  • Buffer Overflows: Risk reduced from Critical to Negligible (if implemented correctly).
  • Code Injection: Risk reduced from Critical to Negligible (if implemented correctly).
  • XSS: Risk reduced from High to Low (requires output encoding as well).
  • DoS: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
  • Logic Errors: Risk significantly reduced, depending on the specific logic.

Currently Implemented:

  • Basic length limits are implemented on text fields using nk_edit_string with a max_length parameter.
  • Type checking is partially implemented, but not consistently across all input points.
  • No pre-Nuklear filtering layer exists.

Missing Implementation:

  • Comprehensive pre-Nuklear filtering layer is missing. This is the most critical gap.
  • Widget-specific validation is inconsistent.
  • Robust error handling for invalid input is lacking in some areas.
  • No regular expression validation is used, even where it would be beneficial.
  • Fuzzing has not been performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Memory Management (Focus on Nuklear API Usage)

Description:

  1. Nuklear API Usage:
    • Correct Context Initialization: Ensure nk_init is called correctly with the chosen allocator (default or custom). Verify the return value to ensure initialization succeeded.
    • Proper Memory Management: Follow Nuklear's documentation precisely regarding memory allocation and deallocation. Never directly manipulate Nuklear's internal data structures (e.g., nk_context, nk_buffer, etc.) except through the provided API functions.
    • Buffer Sizes: Provide correct and validated buffer sizes to Nuklear functions (e.g., nk_edit_buffer, nk_draw_list_stroke, etc.). Double-check these sizes to prevent potential overflows. Calculate sizes dynamically when appropriate, and never assume a fixed size will always be sufficient.
    • nk_clear() usage: Ensure nk_clear() is called appropriately at the end of each frame to reset Nuklear's internal state and prevent potential memory issues.
    • Avoid Dangling Pointers: After calling functions that might modify pointers within Nuklear's context (e.g., if you are managing your own vertex buffers), ensure you don't retain any dangling pointers to memory that Nuklear might have reallocated or freed.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Heap Overflows (Severity: Critical): Providing incorrect buffer sizes to Nuklear functions can lead to heap overflows within Nuklear's internal memory management.
  • Use-After-Free (Severity: Critical): Incorrectly managing memory associated with Nuklear's context or directly manipulating its internal structures can lead to use-after-free vulnerabilities.
  • Double-Frees (Severity: Critical): Incorrectly managing memory or misusing Nuklear's API can lead to double-free vulnerabilities.

Impact:

  • Heap Overflows: Risk reduced from Critical to Negligible (with correct API usage).
  • Use-After-Free: Risk reduced from Critical to Negligible (with correct API usage).
  • Double-Frees: Risk reduced from Critical to Negligible (with correct API usage).

Currently Implemented:

  • nk_init is called, but the return value is not checked.
  • Buffer sizes are mostly hardcoded, with limited dynamic calculation.
  • nk_clear() is called at the end of each frame.

Missing Implementation:

  • nk_init return value check is missing.
  • Dynamic buffer size calculation is not consistently used.
  • No explicit checks to prevent dangling pointers after Nuklear operations.
  • No comprehensive review of all Nuklear API calls for correct memory management.

Mitigation Strategy: Denial of Service (DoS) Prevention via GUI Update Control (Nuklear-Specific Aspects)

Description:

  1. Identify Update Triggers: List all user actions or events that trigger calls to Nuklear drawing functions (e.g., nk_button_label, nk_slider_int, nk_edit_string, etc.).
  2. Rate Limiting (Nuklear Input): Implement rate limiting specifically for user input that directly interacts with Nuklear widgets. This prevents an attacker from rapidly changing widget states and forcing excessive redrawing. This is distinct from general input rate limiting; it focuses on the interaction with Nuklear.
  3. Complexity Limits (Nuklear Widgets):
    • Widget Count: Limit the maximum number of Nuklear widgets that can be displayed simultaneously. This directly limits the amount of work Nuklear has to do per frame.
    • Nested Layouts: Limit the depth of nested Nuklear layouts (e.g., rows within rows within groups). Deeply nested layouts can significantly increase rendering complexity.
  4. Conditional Rendering (Nuklear-Driven):
    • Change Flags: Use flags to indicate when a Nuklear widget's state has actually changed and needs to be redrawn. Only call Nuklear drawing functions for widgets that have changed. This requires careful tracking of widget state within the application.
  5. Avoid Unnecessary Nuklear Calls: Minimize the number of calls to Nuklear drawing functions within each frame. For example, if a widget's appearance hasn't changed, don't redraw it.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Medium): Prevents attackers from overwhelming Nuklear with excessive drawing commands, causing the application to become unresponsive.
  • Resource Exhaustion (Severity: Medium): Reduces the risk of attackers consuming excessive CPU or GPU resources through Nuklear's rendering, potentially affecting other applications.

Impact:

  • DoS: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
  • Resource Exhaustion: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.

Currently Implemented:

  • Some basic debouncing is implemented for button clicks, but this is not specific to Nuklear interactions.

Missing Implementation:

  • Comprehensive rate limiting for all Nuklear widget interactions is missing.
  • Complexity limits (widget count, nested layouts) are not enforced.
  • Conditional rendering based on Nuklear widget state changes is not implemented.
  • No systematic effort to minimize unnecessary Nuklear drawing calls.

Mitigation Strategy: Stay Updated with Nuklear Releases

Description:

  1. Monitor Releases: Regularly check the Nuklear GitHub repository (or other official channels) for new releases.
  2. Review Changelogs: Carefully read the changelogs for each new release, paying attention to security fixes and improvements specifically related to Nuklear's internal code.
  3. Update Promptly: Update to the latest stable version of Nuklear as soon as practical after it's released, especially if it includes security fixes that address vulnerabilities within Nuklear itself.
  4. Testing After Update: After updating Nuklear, thoroughly test the application to ensure that the update hasn't introduced any regressions or compatibility issues specifically related to Nuklear's functionality.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Known Vulnerabilities in Nuklear (Severity: Variable): New vulnerabilities may be discovered in Nuklear's own code. Updating mitigates the risk of being exploited by these known vulnerabilities.

Impact:

  • Known Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced depending on the specific vulnerabilities fixed in each release.

Currently Implemented:

  • The application is currently using a relatively recent version of Nuklear.

Missing Implementation:

  • No formal process for monitoring Nuklear releases and applying updates.
  • No dedicated testing procedure after updating Nuklear.