Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
47 lines (38 loc) · 6.45 KB

File metadata and controls

47 lines (38 loc) · 6.45 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for xianyi/openblas

  • Description: Writing data beyond the allocated memory buffer within OpenBLAS.
  • OpenBLAS Contribution: OpenBLAS, being implemented in C and Assembly for performance, manages memory directly. Errors in dimension handling or internal calculations within OpenBLAS routines can lead to buffer overflows during matrix and vector operations.
  • Example: An application provides a large matrix dimension to an OpenBLAS function. Due to a flaw in OpenBLAS's internal size calculations or buffer management, it allocates an undersized buffer. When OpenBLAS attempts to write the matrix data, it overflows the buffer, corrupting adjacent memory.
  • Impact: Memory corruption, program crash, potential for arbitrary code execution if an attacker can control the overflowed data to overwrite critical program structures or inject malicious code.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Apply security patches by keeping OpenBLAS updated to the latest stable version. Monitor OpenBLAS security advisories for reported buffer overflow vulnerabilities and update promptly.
    • Memory Bounds Checking (Development/Testing): Utilize memory safety tools like AddressSanitizer or Valgrind during development and testing phases to detect buffer overflows within OpenBLAS usage in your application. Report any detected issues to the OpenBLAS developers if they originate within the library itself.
  • Description: Reading data from memory locations outside the allocated buffer within OpenBLAS.
  • OpenBLAS Contribution: Incorrect indexing or pointer arithmetic within OpenBLAS's optimized routines can cause reads from memory locations beyond the intended boundaries of matrices or vectors being processed.
  • Example: An OpenBLAS function, during a complex matrix operation, uses an incorrect index to access an element. This index points outside the allocated memory region for the matrix, leading to an out-of-bounds read. This could potentially leak sensitive data from other parts of memory.
  • Impact: Information leakage (potential exposure of sensitive data residing in memory), program crash, which in some scenarios could be further exploited.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Keep OpenBLAS updated to benefit from security fixes. Out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities are often addressed in updates.
    • Memory Bounds Checking (Development/Testing): Employ memory safety tools (AddressSanitizer, Valgrind) during development and testing to identify out-of-bounds reads when using OpenBLAS in your application. Report any issues found within OpenBLAS to its developers.
  • Description: Integer arithmetic operations within OpenBLAS, particularly when calculating memory sizes or loop bounds, result in overflows or underflows.
  • OpenBLAS Contribution: BLAS operations involve extensive calculations with matrix dimensions and element counts. If these calculations are not carefully handled, integer overflows or underflows can occur within OpenBLAS, leading to unexpected and potentially dangerous behavior.
  • Example: When calculating the size of a matrix buffer, OpenBLAS multiplies row and column dimensions. If these dimensions are maliciously large, the multiplication can result in an integer overflow, leading to a smaller-than-expected buffer allocation. Subsequent operations might then cause buffer overflows when writing to this undersized buffer.
  • Impact: Buffer overflows (due to undersized memory allocations), incorrect program logic leading to unpredictable behavior, potential for denial-of-service or exploitation.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Ensure you are using a recent version of OpenBLAS that incorporates fixes for integer handling issues.
    • Input Validation (Application Level - Critical): While not directly mitigating issues within OpenBLAS, rigorous input validation in your application before calling OpenBLAS functions is crucial. Prevent excessively large input dimensions that could trigger integer overflows within OpenBLAS's internal calculations.
  • Description: When OpenBLAS is configured for multi-threading, concurrent access to shared memory by multiple threads without proper synchronization can lead to race conditions.
  • OpenBLAS Contribution: OpenBLAS can be built to utilize multiple threads for parallel execution of BLAS routines to improve performance. If the threading implementation within OpenBLAS has flaws in synchronization mechanisms, race conditions can occur when multiple threads operate on shared data structures (e.g., matrices).
  • Example: In a multi-threaded OpenBLAS configuration, two threads simultaneously attempt to update the same element of a shared matrix without proper locking. This can lead to data corruption, where the final value of the matrix element is unpredictable and potentially incorrect, depending on the timing of thread execution.
  • Impact: Data corruption, program crashes, unpredictable behavior, potential for denial-of-service or exploitable vulnerabilities if race conditions corrupt critical data structures.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Careful Configuration and Testing (Multi-threading): If multi-threading is necessary, ensure OpenBLAS is correctly configured and built for multi-threaded environments. Thoroughly test your application in multi-threaded scenarios to detect potential race conditions.
    • Consider Single-threaded Build (If applicable): If multi-threading performance gains are not essential for your application, using a single-threaded build of OpenBLAS eliminates the risk of race conditions inherent in its multi-threaded implementation.
    • Regular Updates: Keep OpenBLAS updated, as fixes for threading-related issues and race conditions are often included in updates.