Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 3.66 KB

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 3.66 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for xianyi/openblas

  • Description: Publicly disclosed vulnerabilities within the OpenBLAS library itself, identified by a CVE.
  • How OpenBLAS Contributes: This is a direct vulnerability in OpenBLAS code.
  • Example: CVE-2023-XXXXX (hypothetical) describes a buffer overflow in a specific OpenBLAS function. An attacker crafts input to trigger this vulnerability.
  • Impact: Varies depending on the CVE. Can range from Denial of Service (DoS) to Remote Code Execution (RCE) to information disclosure.
  • Risk Severity: Varies (can be Critical or High) depending on the specific CVE. Refer to the CVE details.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Update OpenBLAS to the latest stable release immediately upon availability. This is the primary mitigation.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to scan for known CVEs in OpenBLAS.
  • Description: Undiscovered vulnerabilities within the OpenBLAS library itself, unknown to the developers and the public.
  • How OpenBLAS Contributes: This is a direct, though unknown, vulnerability in OpenBLAS code.
  • Example: An attacker discovers a new, previously unknown buffer overflow in an OpenBLAS function and exploits it.
  • Impact: Potentially severe (DoS, RCE, information disclosure), similar to known CVEs, but with a higher chance of success due to the lack of patches.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Defense in Depth: Employ multiple layers of security (network firewalls, intrusion detection) to reduce the chance of a successful attack reaching the vulnerable OpenBLAS component. This is crucial since direct patching isn't possible.
    • Runtime Protection (RASP): Consider RASP tools, which can detect and block exploit attempts at runtime, even for unknown vulnerabilities. This offers a layer of protection even before a patch is available.
    • Least Privilege: Run the application with the minimum necessary privileges to limit the impact of a successful exploit.
  • Description: Incorrect build-time or runtime configuration of OpenBLAS that directly introduces a security vulnerability.
    • How OpenBLAS Contributes: OpenBLAS's configuration options, if misused, can create vulnerabilities.
    • Example: Building OpenBLAS with a known-vulnerable threading model, or enabling a debugging feature that exposes internal state in a production environment.
    • Impact: Can range from increased attack surface to directly exploitable vulnerabilities, depending on the misconfiguration.
    • Risk Severity: High (can be critical in some cases, depending on the specific misconfiguration)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use Default Settings: Use the recommended default configuration settings whenever possible.
      • Review Documentation: Thoroughly understand the security implications of each configuration option before changing it.
      • Least Privilege: Enable only the necessary OpenBLAS features and options. Disable any debugging or profiling features in production builds.
      • Hardening Guides: If available, follow any security hardening guides provided by the OpenBLAS project or security researchers.