Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
120 lines (89 loc) · 9.66 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

120 lines (89 loc) · 9.66 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for xianyi/openblas

Mitigation Strategy: Regular OpenBLAS Updates

  • Description:

    1. Monitor for Releases: Actively monitor the OpenBLAS GitHub repository (https://github.com/xianyi/openblas) for new releases and security advisories. Use GitHub's "Watch" feature (set to "Releases only") or integrate with a dependency management system that tracks updates.
    2. Review Release Notes: Carefully examine the release notes and changelog of each new release. Prioritize updates that address security vulnerabilities (look for keywords like "security," "CVE," "fix," "buffer overflow").
    3. Update Dependency: When a security-relevant update is available, update the OpenBLAS version in your project's build configuration (e.g., CMakeLists.txt, requirements.txt, or other dependency management files).
    4. Rebuild and Test: Rebuild your entire application, linking against the updated OpenBLAS library. Execute a comprehensive suite of automated tests (unit, integration, regression) to verify compatibility and ensure no regressions have been introduced.
    5. Deploy: After successful testing, deploy the updated application.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Memory Safety Vulnerabilities (Buffer Overflows, Use-After-Free, etc.): Severity: High to Critical. These can lead to arbitrary code execution.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities within OpenBLAS: Severity: Medium to High.
    • Logic Errors (Incorrect Results) within OpenBLAS: Severity: Variable (depends on the application).
    • Some Side-Channel Attacks (if addressed in updates): Severity: Variable.

  • Impact:

    • Memory Safety Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High. This is the primary defense against known vulnerabilities in OpenBLAS.
    • Denial of Service: Risk reduction: Medium to High.
    • Logic Errors: Risk reduction: Medium.
    • Side-Channel Attacks: Risk reduction: Low to Medium (depends on the update).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. We are watching the GitHub repository, but the update and testing process is manual.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated testing after OpenBLAS updates is incomplete.
    • Deployment is not automatically triggered after successful testing.

Mitigation Strategy: Control OpenBLAS Threading

  • Description:

    1. Determine Build Configuration: Identify how OpenBLAS was built (which threading model it uses). This determines which environment variables or functions are used to control threading.
    2. Set Thread Limit: Limit the number of threads OpenBLAS is allowed to use. This prevents it from consuming all available CPU cores and potentially causing a denial of service. Use one of the following methods, depending on the build configuration:
      • Environment Variables: Set OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS, GOTO_NUM_THREADS, or OMP_NUM_THREADS (check OpenBLAS documentation for the correct variable). Set this before your application starts.
      • Function Call: If available in your OpenBLAS build, use the openblas_set_num_threads() function within your application code to set the thread limit programmatically. Call this function early in your application's execution, before any OpenBLAS computations.
    3. Profile and Tune: Experiment with different thread limits to find the optimal balance between performance and resource usage for your application.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion (specifically, CPU starvation): Severity: Medium to High.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service: Risk reduction: High. Directly controls the maximum CPU resources OpenBLAS can consume.

  • Currently Implemented: No.

  • Missing Implementation: Threading is not explicitly controlled. We need to determine the correct environment variable or function call and set an appropriate limit.

Mitigation Strategy: Build OpenBLAS from Source with Security Flags

  • Description:

    1. Obtain Source Code: Download the OpenBLAS source code from the official GitHub repository (https://github.com/xianyi/openblas).
    2. Verify Checksum: Calculate the checksum (e.g., SHA-256) of the downloaded source code and compare it to the checksum provided by the OpenBLAS project.
    3. Configure Build: Configure the OpenBLAS build using CMake or the appropriate build system. Enable security-related compiler flags:
      • -fstack-protector-all (or similar) for stack smashing protection.
      • -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 (or higher) for compile-time and runtime buffer overflow checks.
      • Consider flags for enabling AddressSanitizer (ASan), ThreadSanitizer (TSan), and UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer (UBSan) during development and testing (e.g., -fsanitize=address).
    4. Build OpenBLAS: Build the OpenBLAS library.
    5. Link Your Application: Link your application against the newly built OpenBLAS library.
    6. Test Thoroughly: Run a comprehensive test suite to ensure the custom-built OpenBLAS works correctly with your application.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Memory Safety Vulnerabilities (Buffer Overflows, Use-After-Free, etc.): Severity: High to Critical.
    • Undefined Behavior: Severity: Variable.

  • Impact:

    • Memory Safety Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: Medium. Provides runtime protection and helps detect errors during development.
    • Undefined Behavior: Risk reduction: Medium.

  • Currently Implemented: No. We are using pre-built binaries.

  • Missing Implementation: We need to switch to building OpenBLAS from source and enable the recommended security flags.

Mitigation Strategy: Fuzzing OpenBLAS (via Application Interface)

  • Description:

    1. Choose a Fuzzer: Select a fuzzing tool suitable for C/C++ libraries (e.g., AFL, libFuzzer, Honggfuzz).
    2. Create a Fuzz Target: Write a "fuzz target" – a small C/C++ program that:
      • Takes input from the fuzzer (typically a byte array).
      • Uses this input to construct valid (and, importantly, invalid) inputs for OpenBLAS functions through your application's API. This is crucial: you're fuzzing the interaction between your code and OpenBLAS, not OpenBLAS in isolation.
      • Calls the relevant OpenBLAS functions (via your application's API) with the generated inputs.
    3. Compile with Instrumentation: Compile the fuzz target, your application code that calls OpenBLAS, and (ideally) OpenBLAS itself with the fuzzer's instrumentation (e.g., using compiler flags provided by the fuzzer).
    4. Run the Fuzzer: Run the fuzzer, providing a small set of initial "seed" inputs. The fuzzer will generate many variations of these inputs.
    5. Monitor for Crashes: Monitor the fuzzer for crashes, hangs, or other unexpected behavior. Each crash represents a potential vulnerability.
    6. Analyze and Fix: Analyze the crashing inputs to determine the root cause. Fix the vulnerability in your application code or, if the issue is within OpenBLAS, report it to the OpenBLAS developers.
    7. Integrate into CI: Integrate fuzzing into your continuous integration (CI) pipeline for regular testing.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Memory Safety Vulnerabilities (Buffer Overflows, Use-After-Free, etc.) in OpenBLAS triggered by your application: Severity: High to Critical.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities in OpenBLAS triggered by your application: Severity: Medium to High.
    • Logic Errors in OpenBLAS triggered by your application: Severity: Variable.

  • Impact:

    • Memory Safety Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: Medium to High. Fuzzing is very effective at finding these.
    • Denial of Service: Risk reduction: Medium.
    • Logic Errors: Risk reduction: Low to Medium.

  • Currently Implemented: No.

  • Missing Implementation: All steps are missing. This is a more advanced technique that requires significant setup.

Mitigation Strategy: Supply Chain Security (for OpenBLAS)

  • Description:

    1. Official Source Only: Download OpenBLAS exclusively from the official GitHub repository: https://github.com/xianyi/openblas.
    2. Checksum Verification: After downloading, always verify the integrity of the downloaded source code or binaries using checksums (e.g., SHA-256). Compare the calculated checksum with the checksum published by the OpenBLAS project. Use appropriate command-line tools (e.g., sha256sum, CertUtil).
    3. Build from Verified Source (Strongly Recommended): Build OpenBLAS from the verified source code whenever possible. This is significantly more secure than using pre-built binaries.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Supply Chain Attacks targeting OpenBLAS: Severity: High. Malicious actors could compromise the distribution channel.

  • Impact:

    • Supply Chain Attacks: Risk reduction: High. These steps are crucial to ensure you're using a legitimate, untampered version of OpenBLAS.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. We download from the official repository.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Checksum verification is not consistently performed.
    • We are currently using pre-built binaries; we should build from source.