Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (76 loc) · 7.79 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

87 lines (76 loc) · 7.79 KB

Threat Model Analysis for academysoftwarefoundation/openvdb

Threat: Malicious File Parsing (File Format Vulnerability)

  • Description: An attacker crafts a malicious OpenVDB file that exploits vulnerabilities in the file parsing logic. This could involve overflowing buffers, triggering integer overflows, or exploiting format-specific parsing errors. The attacker would provide this file to the application.
  • Impact:
    • Critical: Remote Code Execution (RCE) if the vulnerability allows arbitrary code execution.
    • High: Denial of Service (DoS) through application crashes or hangs.
  • Affected OpenVDB Component:
    • openvdb::io::File (and related classes like Stream): The primary file I/O component.
    • Specific tree/grid deserialization routines within openvdb::tree and openvdb::Grid. For example, functions related to reading and interpreting metadata, tree node data, and tile data.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if RCE is possible), High (if DoS is likely).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Fuzz Testing: Use fuzzing tools (e.g., AFL, libFuzzer, OSS-Fuzz) to test the OpenVDB file parsing routines with a wide variety of malformed inputs.
    • Input Validation: Implement strict validation of file headers, metadata, and data sizes before allocating memory or performing complex parsing operations. Reject files that don't conform to expected limits.
    • Memory Safety: Use memory-safe coding practices (bounds checking, avoiding unsafe pointer arithmetic). Consider using a memory-safe language (e.g., Rust) for critical parsing components.
    • Code Auditing: Regularly audit the file parsing code for potential vulnerabilities.
    • Library Updates: Keep OpenVDB updated to the latest version to benefit from security patches.
    • Sandboxing: Consider running the file parsing component in a sandboxed environment (e.g., a separate process with limited privileges) to contain the impact of any vulnerabilities.

Threat: Integer Overflow in Grid Operations

  • Description: An attacker provides input data (either through a file or API) that causes integer overflows during grid operations (e.g., resampling, transformations, filtering). This could lead to unexpected behavior, memory corruption, or potentially even code execution.
  • Impact:
    • High: Denial of Service (DoS) through application crashes.
    • Potentially Critical: Remote Code Execution (RCE) in some cases, although less likely than with direct file parsing vulnerabilities.
  • Affected OpenVDB Component:
    • openvdb::Grid and derived grid classes (e.g., FloatGrid, Vec3fGrid).
    • Functions performing arithmetic operations on grid coordinates or values (e.g., openvdb::math::Coord, resampling functions, filter kernels).
    • openvdb::tools namespace (various utility functions that operate on grids).
  • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Checked Arithmetic: Use checked arithmetic operations (e.g., functions that detect and handle overflows) instead of standard integer arithmetic, especially when dealing with user-provided data.
    • Input Validation: Validate the size and range of input data to prevent excessively large values that could lead to overflows.
    • Code Auditing: Carefully review code that performs arithmetic on grid coordinates and values for potential overflow vulnerabilities.
    • Compiler Warnings: Enable compiler warnings related to integer overflows and treat them as errors.

Threat: Deep Tree Traversal (Stack Overflow)

  • Description: An attacker provides an OpenVDB file with an extremely deeply nested tree structure. Recursive tree traversal functions could exhaust the stack space, leading to a stack overflow and application crash.
  • Impact:
    • High: Denial of Service (DoS) through application crashes.
  • Affected OpenVDB Component:
    • openvdb::tree::Tree and related classes.
    • Recursive functions that traverse the tree (e.g., openvdb::tree::Tree::visit, iterators).
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Depth Limits: Impose a maximum depth limit on OpenVDB trees. Reject files that exceed this limit.
    • Iterative Traversal: Use iterative (non-recursive) tree traversal algorithms whenever possible.
    • Stack Size Monitoring: Monitor stack usage during tree traversal and terminate the operation if it approaches the limit.

Threat: Resource Exhaustion (Memory/CPU)

  • Description: An attacker provides an OpenVDB file or API input that triggers excessive memory allocation or CPU usage. This could be due to extremely large grids, complex operations, or other resource-intensive tasks. The attacker's goal is to cause a denial-of-service condition.
  • Impact:
    • High: Denial of Service (DoS) due to resource exhaustion.
  • Affected OpenVDB Component:
    • All components, as resource exhaustion can affect any part of the library. Specific areas of concern include:
      • openvdb::Grid creation and manipulation.
      • openvdb::tools functions (especially those that perform complex operations like resampling or level set generation).
      • openvdb::io::File (for large file loading).
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Limits: Implement strict limits on memory allocation, grid size, and processing time.
    • Input Validation: Validate input data to prevent excessively large or complex inputs.
    • Timeouts: Use timeouts for all OpenVDB operations.
    • Progressive Loading: For large files, consider using a progressive loading approach (e.g., loading only a portion of the data at a time).
    • Monitoring: Monitor resource usage (memory, CPU, I/O) and alert on any anomalies.

Threat: Uninitialized Memory Access (Potentially leading to RCE)

  • Description: A bug within OpenVDB itself could lead to accessing uninitialized memory. While often leading to crashes, if the uninitialized memory region happens to contain data controllable by an attacker (e.g., through a prior operation or a separate vulnerability), it could potentially be leveraged for remote code execution, although this is a less direct and more complex attack scenario than a classic buffer overflow.
  • Impact:
    • Potentially High/Critical: While most often resulting in a crash (DoS), the potential for RCE exists if combined with other vulnerabilities or specific memory layouts.
  • Affected OpenVDB Component:
    • Potentially any component, but areas of concern include:
      • openvdb::Grid and openvdb::tree::Tree constructors and initialization routines.
      • Memory allocation functions.
  • Risk Severity: High/Critical (due to the potential for RCE, even if unlikely).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Code Auditing: Carefully review OpenVDB code for potential uninitialized memory access.
    • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to detect potential uninitialized memory issues.
    • Memory Sanitizers: Use memory sanitizers (e.g., AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during development and testing of OpenVDB itself.
    • Initialization Checks: Ensure within OpenVDB that all data structures are properly initialized before use.
    • Error Handling: Implement robust error handling within OpenVDB for memory allocation failures.
    • Library Updates: Keep OpenVDB updated.