Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
114 lines (84 loc) · 12.5 KB

File metadata and controls

114 lines (84 loc) · 12.5 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/arrow

Objective: Compromise application using Apache Arrow by exploiting vulnerabilities within Arrow itself or its interaction with the application.

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise Application via Arrow Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
├── 1. Exploit Data Deserialization Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├── 1.1. Malformed Arrow Data Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├── 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow during Deserialization [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └── 1.1.1.1. Send crafted Arrow data exceeding buffer limits during deserialization. [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├── 1.1.2. Integer Overflow during Deserialization [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └── 1.1.2.1. Send Arrow data with maliciously large size parameters leading to integer overflows. [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   └── 1.1.5. Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       └── 1.1.5.1. Send extremely large or deeply nested Arrow data structures to exhaust server resources (memory, CPU) during parsing. [CRITICAL NODE]
├── 2. Exploit Data Processing Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   └── 2.1. Logical Vulnerabilities in Arrow Libraries [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│       └── 2.1.1. Exploit Known CVEs in Arrow [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│           └── 2.1.1.1. Identify and exploit publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the specific Arrow version used by the application. [CRITICAL NODE]
├── 3. Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   └── 3.1. Vulnerable Arrow Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│       └── 3.1.1. Exploit Known CVEs in Arrow Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│           └── 3.1.1.1. Identify and exploit vulnerabilities in libraries that Arrow depends on (e.g., compression libraries, underlying system libraries). [CRITICAL NODE]
└── 4. Exploit Misconfiguration or Misuse of Arrow
    └── 4.2. Application Misuse of Arrow APIs [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └── 4.2.1. Incorrect Data Validation [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
            └── 4.2.1.1. Application fails to properly validate Arrow data after deserialization, leading to vulnerabilities when processing the data. [CRITICAL NODE]
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting weaknesses in how Apache Arrow deserializes data. This is a critical entry point as applications must deserialize Arrow data to use it.
  • Why Critical: Successful exploitation can lead to memory corruption, code execution, or denial of service, directly compromising the application.
  • Attack Vector: Sending intentionally crafted Arrow data that deviates from the expected format or contains malicious payloads during deserialization.
  • Why High-Risk: Malformed data injection is a common and often successful attack technique against deserialization processes.
  • Attack Vector: Sending crafted Arrow data that exceeds allocated buffer sizes during deserialization.
  • Why High-Risk: Buffer overflows are classic memory corruption vulnerabilities that can lead to code execution.
    • 1.1.1.1. Send crafted Arrow data exceeding buffer limits during deserialization. [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Detailed Attack: Attacker crafts Arrow data where size fields or array lengths are manipulated to be larger than the allocated buffers in the deserialization code. When the deserializer attempts to write data into these undersized buffers, it overflows into adjacent memory regions.
      • Impact: Memory corruption, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution if the attacker can control the overflowed data.
  • Attack Vector: Sending Arrow data with maliciously large size parameters that cause integer overflows during size calculations within the deserialization process.
  • Why High-Risk: Integer overflows can lead to unexpected behavior, including buffer overflows, due to incorrect size calculations.
    • 1.1.2.1. Send Arrow data with maliciously large size parameters leading to integer overflows. [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Detailed Attack: Attacker crafts Arrow data with extremely large values for size parameters (e.g., array lengths, buffer sizes). During deserialization, these large values, when used in calculations (like buffer allocation size), can wrap around due to integer overflow, resulting in a much smaller buffer being allocated than intended. Subsequent data writing can then lead to a buffer overflow.
      • Impact: Memory corruption, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.
  • Attack Vector: Sending extremely large or deeply nested Arrow data structures to exhaust server resources (memory, CPU) during the parsing and deserialization phase.
  • Why High-Risk: Denial of service attacks are relatively easy to execute and can disrupt application availability.
    • 1.1.5.1. Send extremely large or deeply nested Arrow data structures to exhaust server resources (memory, CPU) during parsing. [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Detailed Attack: Attacker crafts Arrow data with massive arrays, deeply nested structures, or repeated elements, designed to consume excessive resources during parsing and deserialization. The application spends excessive time and memory attempting to process this data, leading to performance degradation or complete service unavailability.
      • Impact: Denial of service, application becomes unresponsive or crashes due to resource exhaustion.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting logical vulnerabilities within the Apache Arrow libraries themselves, specifically in data processing functionalities.
  • Why Critical: Vulnerabilities in core Arrow libraries can have widespread impact on all applications using them.
  • Attack Vector: Targeting inherent flaws or bugs in Arrow's code logic, particularly in data processing functions.
  • Why High-Risk: These vulnerabilities can be harder to detect and fix, and exploitation can directly compromise the Arrow library's integrity.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the specific version of Apache Arrow used by the application.
  • Why High-Risk: Known CVEs are readily exploitable, and if the application uses an outdated Arrow version, it becomes a highly likely attack vector.
    • 2.1.1.1. Identify and exploit publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the specific Arrow version used by the application. [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Detailed Attack: Attacker identifies the version of Apache Arrow used by the target application (e.g., through dependency analysis, error messages, or version probing). They then search for publicly available CVEs affecting that specific version. If vulnerabilities exist and are exploitable in the application's context, the attacker uses readily available exploit code or techniques to compromise the application.
      • Impact: Depends on the specific CVE, ranging from information disclosure, denial of service, to remote code execution, potentially leading to full system compromise.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in libraries that Apache Arrow depends on.
  • Why Critical: Arrow relies on external libraries, and vulnerabilities in these dependencies can indirectly compromise applications using Arrow.
  • Attack Vector: Targeting vulnerabilities in libraries that Arrow depends on (e.g., compression libraries, system libraries).
  • Why High-Risk: Dependency vulnerabilities are a common attack vector, and applications are often unaware of the security posture of their transitive dependencies.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the dependencies of Apache Arrow.
  • Why High-Risk: Similar to Arrow CVEs, dependency CVEs are readily exploitable if the application's dependencies are not kept up-to-date.
    • 3.1.1.1. Identify and exploit vulnerabilities in libraries that Arrow depends on (e.g., compression libraries, underlying system libraries). [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Detailed Attack: Attacker analyzes the dependencies of the Apache Arrow version used by the application. They then search for publicly known CVEs affecting these dependency libraries. If vulnerable dependencies are found, and exploits are available, the attacker leverages these exploits to compromise the application indirectly through the vulnerable dependency used by Arrow.
      • Impact: Depends on the specific CVE in the dependency, ranging from information disclosure, denial of service, to remote code execution, potentially leading to full system compromise.
  • 4.2. Application Misuse of Arrow APIs [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
    • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure usage of Arrow APIs by the application developers.
    • Why High-Risk: Developer errors are common, and misusing security-sensitive APIs can easily introduce vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vector: The application fails to properly validate Arrow data after deserialization, before using it in application logic.
  • Why High-Risk: Lack of input validation is a fundamental security flaw, and even if Arrow's deserialization is secure, the application can still be vulnerable if it doesn't validate the processed data.
    • 4.2.1.1. Application fails to properly validate Arrow data after deserialization, leading to vulnerabilities when processing the data. [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Detailed Attack: The application receives and deserializes Arrow data. However, it assumes the data is safe and conforms to expected constraints without performing application-level validation. The attacker can then send malicious Arrow data that, while valid Arrow format, contains unexpected or malicious content (e.g., out-of-range values, unexpected data types, malicious strings). When the application processes this unvalidated data, it can lead to various vulnerabilities like SQL injection (if data is used in database queries), command injection (if data is used in system commands), or business logic bypasses.
      • Impact: Depends on the application logic and the type of vulnerability exposed by the lack of validation, ranging from data manipulation, information disclosure, to code execution.