Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
107 lines (79 loc) · 8.47 KB

File metadata and controls

107 lines (79 loc) · 8.47 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/incubator-brpc

Objective: High-Risk Attack Paths for brpc-based Application

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Tree: High-Risk Paths - Compromise brpc-based Application

Root Goal: Compromise brpc-based Application (High-Risk Paths)

    AND
    ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit brpc Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
    │   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Serialization/Deserialization Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   └── 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow in Deserialization
    │   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.2. Protocol Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
    │   │   └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.2.1. Message Injection/Manipulation (if no TLS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.4. Denial of Service Attacks [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.4.1. Resource Exhaustion (CPU, Memory, Network) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.4.3. Connection Exhaustion [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.5. Information Disclosure [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.5.1. Error Messages Revealing Internal Information [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.5.3. Debug/Diagnostic Information Leakage [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    AND
    ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit brpc Misconfigurations [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.1. Insecure Default Configurations [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.2. Weak or Missing Transport Layer Security (TLS/SSL) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.3. Permissive Access Control/Firewall Rules [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4. Unnecessary Features Enabled [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • General Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in brpc library versions.
    • Zero-day vulnerabilities discovered through independent research or vulnerability disclosure programs.
    • Vulnerabilities in dependencies used by brpc (e.g., protobuf, zlib, etc.).
  • 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow in Deserialization:
    • Attack Vector: Sending crafted messages with oversized fields or deeply nested structures that exceed buffer limits during deserialization.
    • Exploitation: Overwriting memory regions leading to crashes, code execution, or denial of service.
    • Example: Malformed Protocol Buffer messages exploiting parsing weaknesses in brpc's deserialization routines.
  • 1.2.1. Message Injection/Manipulation (if no TLS) (High-Risk Path):
    • Attack Vector: Intercepting network traffic when TLS/SSL is not enabled or weakly configured.
    • Exploitation: Modifying message content in transit to alter application logic, inject malicious commands, or exfiltrate data.
    • Example: Man-in-the-middle attacks to change request parameters or response data.
  • 1.4.1. Resource Exhaustion (CPU, Memory, Network) (High-Risk Path):

    • Attack Vector: Flooding the brpc service with a large volume of requests, oversized messages, or requests that trigger computationally expensive operations.
    • Exploitation: Overloading server resources (CPU, memory, network bandwidth) causing service degradation or complete outage.
    • Example: Sending millions of requests per second, sending extremely large messages, or triggering complex database queries through brpc calls.
  • 1.4.3. Connection Exhaustion (High-Risk Path):

    • Attack Vector: Opening a massive number of connections to the brpc server, exceeding connection limits and exhausting server resources.
    • Exploitation: Preventing legitimate clients from establishing connections and accessing the service.
    • Example: SYN flood attacks or simply opening and holding a large number of TCP connections.
  • 1.5.1. Error Messages Revealing Internal Information (High-Risk Path):

    • Attack Vector: Triggering error conditions in the brpc service or application and observing verbose error responses.
    • Exploitation: Leaking sensitive information like internal paths, configuration details, library versions, or database schema from error messages.
    • Example: Sending malformed requests that cause exceptions and expose stack traces or internal server errors in the response.
  • 1.5.3. Debug/Diagnostic Information Leakage (High-Risk Path):

    • Attack Vector: Accessing debug or diagnostic endpoints that are unintentionally exposed in production environments.
    • Exploitation: Obtaining sensitive information from debug logs, tracing data, metrics endpoints, or other diagnostic features.
    • Example: Accessing /status/protobufs or similar debug endpoints that might reveal internal service details or even configuration parameters.
  • General Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting common misconfigurations due to lack of security awareness or rushed deployments.
    • Leveraging default settings that are not secure in production environments.
    • Finding and exploiting deviations from security best practices in brpc configuration.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting default settings in brpc that are not secure-by-default.
    • Exploitation: Gaining unauthorized access or control due to weak default authentication, permissive access controls, or disabled security features.
    • Example: If brpc defaults to no TLS or weak encryption, attackers can easily intercept traffic.
  • Attack Vector: brpc communication without TLS/SSL or with weak cipher suites.
    • Exploitation: Man-in-the-middle attacks to intercept, modify, or eavesdrop on communication between brpc clients and servers.
    • Example: Network sniffing to capture sensitive data transmitted over unencrypted brpc channels.
  • Attack Vector: brpc services exposed to untrusted networks or lacking proper access control mechanisms.
    • Exploitation: Direct access to internal brpc services from the internet or untrusted networks, bypassing intended security boundaries.
    • Example: Firewall rules allowing public access to brpc ports, or lack of application-level authorization checks.
  • Attack Vector: Unnecessary debug features, less secure protocols, or experimental functionalities enabled in production.
    • Exploitation: Increased attack surface due to extra features, potential vulnerabilities in less-tested features, or information leakage from debug endpoints.
    • Example: Leaving debug endpoints like /vars or less secure protocols like HTTP/1.0 enabled in production.