Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
97 lines (66 loc) · 9.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

97 lines (66 loc) · 9.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/incubator-brpc

Mitigation Strategy: Keep brpc and Dependencies Updated

  • Description:

    1. Regularly monitor the Apache incubator-brpc project website, mailing lists, and GitHub repository for new releases and security advisories.
    2. Establish a process for promptly updating the brpc library used in your application to the latest stable version recommended by the project.
    3. Include checks for outdated brpc library versions in your build process or CI/CD pipeline.
    4. Test updated brpc versions in a staging environment before deploying to production to ensure compatibility and stability within your brpc application.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Known Vulnerabilities in brpc or its direct dependencies (High Severity): Exploits of publicly disclosed security flaws specifically within the brpc framework code or its immediately required libraries.
      • Exposure to Unpatched Issues (Medium to High Severity): Prolonged use of older versions increases the risk of encountering and being vulnerable to known issues that are already fixed in newer brpc releases.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation of known vulnerabilities within the brpc framework itself. Provides a proactive approach to security maintenance.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Dependency management tools are used to track brpc version, but manual updates are still the primary method. No automated alerts specifically for new brpc releases are in place.

    • Missing Implementation: Automated checks for new brpc releases and automated update processes are missing. A more proactive monitoring system for brpc specific security advisories is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Configure brpc Server Request Size Limits

  • Description:

    1. Utilize brpc server configuration options to set max_body_size or equivalent parameters that limit the maximum allowed size of incoming RPC requests.
    2. Determine appropriate size limits based on the expected size of legitimate RPC requests for your services and the resource capacity of your brpc servers.
    3. Configure brpc to reject requests exceeding the max_body_size with a defined error code and message.
    4. Monitor brpc server logs for instances of rejected oversized requests to detect potential DoS attempts targeting brpc directly.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Payloads (High Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming brpc servers by sending excessively large RPC requests that consume excessive resources (memory, bandwidth, processing).
      • Resource Exhaustion at brpc Server Level (Medium to High Severity): Protects brpc server resources from being depleted by processing extremely large, potentially malicious, requests.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of DoS attacks directly targeting brpc servers with large payloads. Improves the stability and resource management of brpc services.

    • Currently Implemented: Not directly implemented within brpc configuration. Size limits are currently enforced at the infrastructure level (e.g., load balancer).

    • Missing Implementation: max_body_size or equivalent configuration is not set within brpc server options. Size limits are not enforced at the brpc framework level itself, relying on external components.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce TLS/SSL within brpc Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Configure brpc server options to enable TLS/SSL for secure communication. This typically involves specifying certificate and key files within the brpc server configuration.
    2. Ensure brpc clients are configured to connect to servers using the TLS/SSL enabled ports and protocols.
    3. Select strong cipher suites and TLS protocol versions within brpc's TLS configuration to ensure robust encryption.
    4. For internal service-to-service communication using brpc, also enable TLS/SSL to protect data in transit within the internal network.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks targeting brpc communication (High Severity): Prevents eavesdropping and interception of RPC messages exchanged via brpc.
      • Data Confidentiality Breaches in brpc communication (High Severity): Protects sensitive data transmitted through brpc from unauthorized disclosure during transit.
      • Data Integrity Compromise in brpc communication (Medium Severity): Prevents unauthorized modification of RPC messages during transit when using brpc.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of MitM attacks and data breaches specifically related to communication handled by brpc. Ensures confidentiality and integrity of RPC data.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. TLS/SSL is enabled for external-facing HTTP endpoints handled by brpc, but configuration is managed outside of brpc itself (e.g., at load balancer).

    • Missing Implementation: Direct TLS/SSL configuration within brpc server settings is not fully utilized. TLS/SSL is not consistently enforced for all brpc communication scenarios, especially internal service-to-service communication using brpc directly.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Request Rate Limiting/Throttling within brpc Service Handlers or Interceptors

  • Description:

    1. Utilize brpc's interceptor mechanism or implement rate limiting logic directly within your brpc service handlers.
    2. Implement rate limiting based on various criteria relevant to your application, such as client IP address, user ID, API key, or specific RPC method being called.
    3. Configure rate limits based on the capacity and desired service levels of your brpc services.
    4. Return appropriate error responses (e.g., brpc::ERP_REJECT) from brpc service handlers or interceptors when rate limits are exceeded.
    5. Log rate limiting events within brpc server logs for monitoring and analysis of potential abuse or DoS attempts.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks targeting brpc services (High Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion of brpc servers due to excessive requests, even if individual requests are small.
      • Abuse of brpc Services (Medium Severity): Limits the impact of malicious or misbehaving clients attempting to overuse or overload specific brpc services.
      • Brute-Force Attacks against brpc Endpoints (Medium Severity): Reduces the effectiveness of brute-force attempts by limiting the rate of requests.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of DoS attacks and service abuse directly at the brpc service level. Provides granular control over request rates.

    • Currently Implemented: Not directly implemented within brpc service handlers or interceptors. Rate limiting is currently handled at the infrastructure level (e.g., load balancer).

    • Missing Implementation: No rate limiting logic is implemented within brpc application code (service handlers or interceptors). brpc's interceptor capabilities are not utilized for request throttling or rate limiting.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authentication and Authorization Interceptors in brpc

  • Description:

    1. Develop brpc interceptors to handle authentication and authorization checks for all incoming RPC requests.
    2. Within the interceptors, verify client credentials (e.g., API keys, JWT tokens, TLS client certificates) and authenticate the request.
    3. Implement authorization logic within the interceptors to enforce access control policies based on client identity and the requested RPC method.
    4. Utilize brpc's interceptor chain to ensure authentication and authorization checks are applied consistently to all relevant RPC services.
    5. Return appropriate error responses (e.g., brpc::ERP_AUTH_FAIL, brpc::ERP_PERMISSION_DENIED) from interceptors when authentication or authorization fails.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Unauthorized Access to brpc Services (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized clients from invoking RPC methods and accessing sensitive data exposed through brpc.
      • Privilege Escalation within brpc Services (Medium to High Severity): Enforces access control, limiting the actions a compromised or malicious client can perform even if they bypass initial authentication.
      • Data Breaches via Unauthorized brpc Access (High Severity): Protects sensitive data by ensuring only authenticated and authorized clients can access it through brpc services.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and data breaches related to brpc services. Provides a centralized and consistent approach to access control within the brpc application.

    • Currently Implemented: Basic API key authentication is implemented within individual service handlers, but not using brpc interceptors. Authorization logic is also scattered and not centralized.

    • Missing Implementation: brpc interceptors are not utilized for authentication and authorization. No centralized authentication and authorization framework integrated with brpc interceptors. Consistent and enforced authentication and authorization policies across all brpc services are lacking.