Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (67 loc) · 6.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (67 loc) · 6.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/incubator-brpc

Objective: To achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server hosting the brpc-based application, or to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) affecting the application's availability.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise brpc Application /
/
Remote Code Execution (RCE) Denial of Service (DoS) / / | / / | Vulnerability in Resource Network Serialization/ Exhaustion Flooding Deserialization (CPU, Mem) [HR][CN] (e.g., Protobuf) [HR] /
[HR][CN] /
/ CPU: Send / Intensive Massive Crafted Ops Data Protobuf [HR] [HR] Message [HR][CN] Memory: Allocate Large Objects / Leak Memory [HR]

Attack Tree Path: Remote Code Execution (RCE) Branch

  • Vulnerability in Serialization/Deserialization (e.g., Protobuf) [HR][CN]:

    • Description: This is the most critical vulnerability. brpc uses Protocol Buffers (protobuf) for data serialization. If the application doesn't strictly validate data before deserialization, an attacker can craft a malicious protobuf message. When this message is deserialized, it can trigger arbitrary code execution on the server. This is a classic "deserialization vulnerability," and while protobuf itself is designed to be safe, application-level errors can easily introduce this vulnerability.
    • Why High-Risk: Deserialization vulnerabilities are frequently found in applications. The impact (RCE) is the highest possible.
    • Why Critical Node: This is the entry point for a highly impactful attack. Securing this is paramount.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Input Validation: Implement extremely rigorous validation of every field in every protobuf message before deserialization. Validate data types, lengths, ranges, and allowed values. Use a whitelist approach (allow only known-good values).
      • Safe Deserialization: Avoid deserializing data from untrusted sources if possible. If unavoidable, use a sandboxed environment or a restricted user account. Consider alternatives to full object deserialization, such as extracting only necessary fields.
      • Regular Audits: Conduct frequent security audits of the code that handles protobuf serialization and deserialization. Pay close attention to any custom protoc plugins or extensions.
      • Dependency Management: Keep protobuf and related libraries up-to-date.
      • Fuzz Testing: Use fuzzing to send malformed protobuf messages and observe the application's behavior.

  • Crafted Protobuf Message [HR][CN]:

    • Description: This is the actual exploit payload. The attacker crafts a protobuf message that, when deserialized, exploits the vulnerability described above.
    • Why High-Risk: If a deserialization vulnerability exists, crafting a malicious message is highly likely.
    • Why Critical Node: This is the direct exploitation step.
    • Mitigation Strategies: The mitigation strategies are the same as for the "Vulnerability in Serialization/Deserialization" node, as this is the manifestation of that vulnerability.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) Branch

  • Resource Exhaustion (CPU, Memory) [HR]:

    • Description: An attacker sends requests designed to consume excessive server resources, making the application unresponsive to legitimate users.

    • Why High-Risk: Resource exhaustion attacks are relatively easy to launch and can have a significant impact on availability.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Rate Limiting: Limit the number of requests from a single client or IP address. brpc provides mechanisms for this.
      • Resource Limits: Configure limits on CPU usage, memory allocation, and the number of bthreads.
      • Timeouts: Set appropriate timeouts for RPC calls to prevent long-running requests from consuming resources.
      • Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor resource usage and set up alerts for unusual activity.

    • CPU: Intensive Ops [HR]:

      • Description: The attacker sends requests that trigger computationally expensive operations on the server, exhausting CPU resources.
      • Mitigation: Same as general Resource Exhaustion.

    • Memory: Allocate Large Objects / Leak Memory [HR]:

      • Description: The attacker sends requests that cause the server to allocate large amounts of memory or trigger memory leaks, eventually leading to a crash or unresponsiveness.
      • Mitigation: Same as general Resource Exhaustion, plus careful memory management in the application code.

  • Network Flooding [HR][CN]:

    • Description: The attacker overwhelms the server with a large volume of network traffic, preventing legitimate requests from reaching the application.

    • Why High-Risk: Network flooding attacks are very common and easy to execute.

    • Why Critical Node: This is a fundamental attack vector against network services.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Network-Level Defenses: Use firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), and other network security tools.
      • Load Balancing: Distribute traffic across multiple servers.
      • Rate Limiting: (Also applies here, even at the network level).
      • Connection Limits: Limit the maximum number of concurrent connections.

    • Send Massive Data [HR]:

      • Description: Sending large amounts of data in requests to consume bandwidth and processing resources.
      • Mitigation: Input validation to limit request sizes, network-level defenses.