Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
181 lines (159 loc) · 21.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

181 lines (159 loc) · 21.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/mesos

Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS Encryption for Mesos Communication

1. Enable TLS Encryption for Mesos Communication

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS Encryption for Mesos Communication
  • Description:
    1. Generate TLS Certificates: Create TLS certificates and keys for the Mesos Master and Agents. Use a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) or self-signed certificates (for testing/internal environments, but CA-signed is recommended for production).
    2. Configure Mesos Master: Set the following Mesos Master configuration options in mesos.conf or via command-line flags:
      • --ssl_enabled=true
      • --ssl_cert_file=<path_to_master_certificate>
      • --ssl_key_file=<path_to_master_key>
      • --ssl_ca_cert_file=<path_to_CA_certificate> (if using CA-signed certificates)
      • --authenticate_messages=true (recommended in conjunction with TLS)
    3. Configure Mesos Agents: Set the following Mesos Agent configuration options in mesos-agent.conf or via command-line flags:
      • --ssl_enabled=true
      • --ssl_cert_file=<path_to_agent_certificate>
      • --ssl_key_file=<path_to_agent_key>
      • --ssl_ca_cert_file=<path_to_CA_certificate> (if using CA-signed certificates)
      • --authenticatee=tls (to enforce TLS authentication)
    4. Framework Configuration: While frameworks don't directly configure Mesos TLS, ensure framework communication with the Mesos Master (e.g., using Mesos client libraries) is also over HTTPS/TLS if the Master is configured for TLS.
    5. Verification: After restarting Mesos Master and Agents, verify TLS is enabled by checking logs for successful TLS handshake messages.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Eavesdropping (High Severity): Interception of unencrypted communication between Mesos Master and Agents, exposing sensitive data like task information, resource offers, and framework details.
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Attackers intercepting and potentially manipulating communication between Mesos components, leading to unauthorized actions or data breaches.
  • Impact:
    • Eavesdropping: Risk reduced to negligible if TLS is correctly implemented and strong ciphers are used for Mesos internal communication.
    • MITM Attacks: Risk significantly reduced, as attackers would need to compromise TLS certificates to perform MITM attacks on Mesos communication channels.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. TLS is enabled for communication between Mesos Master and Agents in the production environment. Certificates are managed using a dedicated certificate management system.
  • Missing Implementation: While Master-Agent communication is TLS encrypted, ensure all internal Mesos components and potentially framework-Master communication (if applicable and not already HTTPS by framework library) are also leveraging TLS. Documentation for framework developers should explicitly mention TLS requirements for Mesos communication.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure ZooKeeper Communication

2. Secure ZooKeeper Communication

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure ZooKeeper Communication
  • Description:
    1. Enable ZooKeeper TLS: Configure ZooKeeper to use TLS for client connections. This involves setting properties in the zoo.cfg file on ZooKeeper servers, such as:
      • ssl.client.enable=true
      • ssl.keyStore.location=<path_to_zookeeper_keystore>
      • ssl.keyStore.password=<zookeeper_keystore_password>
      • ssl.trustStore.location=<path_to_zookeeper_truststore>
      • ssl.trustStore.password=<zookeeper_truststore_password>
    2. Configure Mesos Masters for TLS ZooKeeper: When starting Mesos Masters, provide the ZooKeeper connection string with the zk:// prefix and ensure the Mesos Master JVM is configured to trust the ZooKeeper TLS certificates. This might involve adding the ZooKeeper CA certificate to the Mesos Master's Java truststore.
    3. Verification: Use ZooKeeper command-line tools or client libraries to connect to ZooKeeper over TLS and verify the connection is encrypted. Check ZooKeeper logs for successful TLS handshake messages.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Eavesdropping on ZooKeeper Communication (Medium Severity): Exposing sensitive cluster metadata, including framework information and cluster configuration details, if ZooKeeper communication is unencrypted.
    • ZooKeeper MITM Attacks (Medium Severity): Manipulation of cluster state information in ZooKeeper if communication is not encrypted and authenticated, potentially leading to cluster instability or unauthorized actions.
  • Impact:
    • Eavesdropping on ZooKeeper Communication: Risk reduced to negligible with TLS encryption for ZooKeeper communication used by Mesos.
    • ZooKeeper MITM Attacks: Risk significantly reduced, requiring certificate compromise for successful MITM attacks on ZooKeeper communication.
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. ZooKeeper communication used by Mesos is currently unencrypted.
  • Missing Implementation: TLS encryption for ZooKeeper needs to be implemented. This requires setting up TLS certificates for ZooKeeper, configuring ZooKeeper servers to use TLS, and updating Mesos Master configurations to connect to ZooKeeper over TLS. This is a critical missing security measure for securing Mesos cluster management.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Mesos Authentication Plugins

3. Implement Mesos Authentication Plugins

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Mesos Authentication Plugins
  • Description:
    1. Choose an Authentication Plugin: Select a suitable Mesos authentication plugin. Options include:
      • OAuth 2.0 Plugin: Integrate with an OAuth 2.0 provider for token-based authentication for frameworks and agents.
      • Kerberos Plugin: Use Kerberos for authentication in Kerberos-enabled environments for Mesos components.
      • Custom Authentication Plugin: Develop a custom plugin if specific authentication requirements exist for Mesos components.
    2. Configure Mesos Master for Authentication: Set the --authenticatee and --authenticator Mesos Master configuration options in mesos.conf or via command-line flags to enable authentication and specify the chosen plugin. For example, for OAuth 2.0:
      • --authenticatee=oauth2
      • --authenticator=oauth2
      • Configure plugin-specific options like --oauth2_provider_url, --oauth2_client_id, etc. as needed in mesos.conf.
    3. Configure Mesos Agents for Authentication: Set the --authenticatee option on Mesos Agents in mesos-agent.conf or via command-line flags to match the chosen authentication mechanism (e.g., --authenticatee=oauth2 or --authenticatee=tls if using TLS client certificates for agent authentication).
    4. Framework Authentication: Frameworks need to be updated to provide authentication credentials when registering with the Mesos Master, as required by the chosen plugin.
    5. Testing: Thoroughly test the authentication setup by attempting to register frameworks and agents with and without valid credentials to ensure unauthorized access is blocked at the Mesos level.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Framework Registration (High Severity): Rogue frameworks registering with the Mesos Master without authentication, potentially launching malicious tasks and gaining unauthorized access to cluster resources.
    • Unauthorized Agent Registration (Medium Severity): Compromised or malicious agents joining the Mesos cluster without authentication, potentially executing unauthorized tasks or disrupting cluster operations.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Framework Registration: Risk significantly reduced to negligible if strong authentication is enforced for framework registration with Mesos.
    • Unauthorized Agent Registration: Risk significantly reduced, depending on the strength of the chosen agent authentication method enforced by Mesos.
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. Mesos cluster currently operates without framework or agent authentication enforced by Mesos itself.
  • Missing Implementation: Implementing a robust authentication plugin within Mesos is crucial. OAuth 2.0 integration is recommended as it aligns with modern authentication practices. This is a high priority security improvement for controlling access to the Mesos cluster.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Mesos Authorization using ACLs

4. Enforce Mesos Authorization using ACLs

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Mesos Authorization using ACLs
  • Description:
    1. Define ACL Policies: Define fine-grained ACL policies based on your organization's security requirements. ACLs in Mesos can control permissions for:
      • Framework registration.
      • Task launching on specific agents or agent attributes.
      • Resource access (CPU, memory, GPUs, etc.) offered by Mesos.
      • Administrative actions within Mesos (e.g., agent decommissioning).
    2. Configure Mesos Master ACLs: Configure ACLs in the Mesos Master configuration file (e.g., mesos.conf) or through the Mesos API. ACLs are typically defined in JSON format and loaded by the Mesos Master.
    3. Testing ACL Enforcement: Thoroughly test ACL policies by attempting actions with different user/framework identities and verifying that permissions are correctly enforced by Mesos. Ensure that frameworks and users only have the necessary permissions within the Mesos environment.
    4. Regular Review and Update: ACL policies within Mesos should be reviewed and updated regularly as application requirements and security policies evolve. Ensure that Mesos ACLs remain aligned with the principle of least privilege within the Mesos cluster.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Resource Access (Medium to High Severity): Frameworks accessing resources within Mesos that they are not authorized to use, leading to resource contention or unauthorized operations within the cluster.
    • Privilege Escalation within Mesos (Medium Severity): Compromised frameworks or user accounts gaining elevated privileges within the Mesos cluster and performing actions beyond their intended scope.
    • Lateral Movement within Mesos (Medium Severity): In a multi-tenant Mesos environment, lack of authorization allowing compromised frameworks to impact other tenants' resources or applications managed by Mesos.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Resource Access: Risk significantly reduced by enforcing fine-grained access control within Mesos.
    • Privilege Escalation within Mesos: Risk reduced by limiting the permissions granted to frameworks and users within the Mesos cluster using ACLs.
    • Lateral Movement within Mesos: Risk reduced in multi-tenant Mesos environments by isolating permissions between tenants at the Mesos level.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic ACLs are implemented to restrict framework registration to authorized users within Mesos.
  • Missing Implementation: Fine-grained ACLs for resource access, task launching on specific agents, and administrative actions within Mesos are not fully implemented. ACL policies need to be expanded within Mesos to cover these areas for enhanced security control over the cluster.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Resource Limits and Quotas within Mesos

5. Implement Resource Limits and Quotas within Mesos

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Resource Limits and Quotas within Mesos
  • Description:
    1. Define Resource Limits in Mesos: Configure resource limits (CPU, memory, disk I/O, network bandwidth) for frameworks and tasks within Mesos. This can be done through framework roles, resource roles, or using Mesos attributes and constraints configured in Mesos.
    2. Enforce Quotas in Mesos: Implement quotas within Mesos to limit the total resources that a framework or user can consume across the entire Mesos cluster or within specific resource pools managed by Mesos.
    3. Monitor Resource Usage in Mesos: Implement monitoring of Mesos resource usage by frameworks and tasks. Set up alerts within Mesos monitoring systems for exceeding resource limits or quotas defined in Mesos.
    4. Dynamic Adjustment within Mesos (Optional): Consider implementing dynamic resource limit adjustments within Mesos based on application needs and cluster load, while still respecting overall quotas defined in Mesos.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Resource Exhaustion Attacks within Mesos (Medium to High Severity): Malicious or buggy tasks consuming excessive resources within the Mesos cluster, starving other tasks or impacting Mesos Agent performance.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) within Mesos (Medium Severity): Resource exhaustion within Mesos leading to DoS conditions, making applications managed by Mesos unavailable.
    • Noisy Neighbor Problem within Mesos (Medium Severity): One task consuming excessive resources within Mesos negatively impacting the performance of other tasks running on the same agent managed by Mesos.
  • Impact:
    • Resource Exhaustion Attacks within Mesos: Risk significantly reduced by limiting resource consumption per task and framework within Mesos.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) within Mesos: Risk reduced by preventing resource exhaustion scenarios managed by Mesos.
    • Noisy Neighbor Problem within Mesos: Impact mitigated by resource limits enforced by Mesos, ensuring fairer resource allocation and preventing performance degradation for other tasks within the cluster.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic resource limits (CPU and memory) are configured for tasks through framework configurations leveraging Mesos resource management.
  • Missing Implementation: Quotas are not fully implemented at the framework or user level within Mesos. Disk I/O and network bandwidth limits are not consistently enforced by Mesos. More comprehensive resource management and quota enforcement within Mesos are needed to prevent resource abuse and ensure fair resource allocation within the cluster.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Mesos API Access

6. Secure Mesos API Access

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Mesos API Access
  • Description:
    1. Restrict API Exposure: Minimize the exposure of the Mesos API to external networks. Ideally, keep the Mesos API accessible only within the internal network. Configure network firewalls to restrict access to the Mesos Master API port.
    2. Implement API Authentication in Mesos: Enforce authentication for all Mesos API requests. Utilize Mesos' built-in API authentication mechanisms, such as API keys or consider integrating with authentication plugins for API access control.
    3. Implement API Authorization in Mesos: Apply authorization policies to control which users or applications can access specific Mesos API endpoints and perform certain actions. Leverage Mesos ACLs for API authorization if applicable.
    4. Enable API Rate Limiting in Mesos: Implement rate limiting on the Mesos API to prevent abuse and DoS attacks targeting the Mesos Master API. Configure rate limiting mechanisms at the network level or within the Mesos Master itself if such features are available or can be added via extensions.
    5. Monitor API Access Logs in Mesos: Enable detailed logging of Mesos API access, including authentication attempts, authorization decisions, and API requests in Mesos Master logs. Monitor these logs for suspicious activity targeting the Mesos API.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized API Access (High Severity): Unsecured Mesos API access allowing attackers to directly interact with the Mesos Master, potentially launching tasks, retrieving cluster information, or disrupting Mesos operations.
    • API Abuse and DoS Attacks (Medium Severity): Unprotected Mesos APIs vulnerable to abuse and DoS attacks, potentially overwhelming the Mesos Master and making the cluster unavailable.
    • Data Exfiltration via API (Medium Severity): If Mesos API access is not properly controlled, attackers potentially using the API to exfiltrate sensitive cluster metadata or task information managed by Mesos.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized API Access: Risk significantly reduced by enforcing authentication and authorization for Mesos API access.
    • API Abuse and DoS Attacks: Risk reduced by rate limiting and monitoring of Mesos API traffic.
    • Data Exfiltration via API: Risk reduced by access control and monitoring of Mesos API usage.
  • Currently Implemented: Mesos API is only accessible from within the internal network. Basic API authentication using API keys is implemented for some administrative tasks interacting with the Mesos API.
  • Missing Implementation: More robust API authentication and authorization mechanisms are needed for the Mesos API, especially if the API needs to be exposed to external services or users. OAuth 2.0 integration for Mesos API access should be considered. API rate limiting for the Mesos API is not fully implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable Comprehensive Mesos Logging and Security Monitoring

7. Enable Comprehensive Mesos Logging and Security Monitoring

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enable Comprehensive Mesos Logging and Security Monitoring
  • Description:
    1. Configure Detailed Mesos Logging: Configure Mesos Master and Agents to generate detailed logs, including:
      • Authentication and authorization events within Mesos.
      • Mesos API requests and responses.
      • Task lifecycle events (launch, kill, status updates) managed by Mesos.
      • Resource allocation and usage within Mesos.
      • Error and warning messages from Mesos components.
    2. Centralize Mesos Log Collection: Implement a centralized logging system (e.g., ELK stack, Splunk, cloud-based logging services) to collect logs specifically from Mesos Masters and Agents.
    3. Implement Mesos Security Monitoring Rules: Define security monitoring rules and alerts based on Mesos log data. Focus on detecting:
      • Failed authentication attempts against Mesos.
      • Unauthorized Mesos API access.
      • Suspicious task activity within Mesos.
      • Resource anomalies within Mesos resource management.
      • Error patterns indicative of attacks targeting Mesos.
    4. Integrate with SIEM: Integrate the centralized Mesos logging system with a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system for advanced threat detection, correlation, and incident response related to Mesos security events.
    5. Regularly Review Mesos Logs and Alerts: Establish a process for regularly reviewing Mesos logs and security alerts to identify and respond to potential security incidents within the Mesos cluster.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Delayed Incident Detection within Mesos (Medium to High Severity): Without comprehensive Mesos logging and monitoring, security incidents within the Mesos cluster might go undetected for extended periods.
    • Insufficient Audit Trails for Mesos (Medium Severity): Lack of detailed Mesos logs hinders security investigations and incident response efforts related to Mesos security.
    • Missed Security Events within Mesos (Medium Severity): Without proactive monitoring and alerting of Mesos security events, critical security events might be missed.
  • Impact:
    • Delayed Incident Detection within Mesos: Risk significantly reduced by real-time monitoring and alerting of Mesos security events.
    • Insufficient Audit Trails for Mesos: Resolved by comprehensive logging of Mesos components and activities.
    • Missed Security Events within Mesos: Risk reduced by proactive monitoring and alerting of security events within the Mesos cluster.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic Mesos logs are collected and stored, but detailed security-relevant logging specifically for Mesos security events is not fully enabled. Basic monitoring of Mesos cluster health is in place.
  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive security-focused logging needs to be implemented for Mesos, including detailed authentication, authorization, and API access logs specifically for Mesos components. Security monitoring rules and alerts need to be defined and integrated with a SIEM system for proactive threat detection and incident response related to Mesos security. This is a crucial step for improving security visibility and incident response capabilities for the Mesos infrastructure itself.