Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
121 lines (100 loc) · 13 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

121 lines (100 loc) · 13 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/mxnet

Objective: Compromise Application via MXNet Exploitation

Attack Tree Visualization

[CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via MXNet Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE] ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit Malicious Model Input [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH START] │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Supply Malicious Model File [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.1.1. Deserialization Vulnerability Exploitation [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.1.1.1. Execute Arbitrary Code via Crafted Model File (.params, .json, .symbol) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ ├── 1.2.1.3. Exploit Logic Bugs in Custom Operators (if application uses them) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.2.1.3.1. Identify and Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application-Specific Custom Operators Built with MXNet [HIGH RISK PATH] ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit MXNet Software Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH START] │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.1. Exploit Known MXNet Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.1.1. Leverage Publicly Disclosed Vulnerabilities (CVEs) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.1.1.1. Identify and Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in the Application's MXNet Version [HIGH RISK PATH] ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 3. Exploit Weaknesses in MXNet Integration and Configuration [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH START] │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 3.1. Insecure Model Storage and Access [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.1.1. Compromise Model Repository [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.1.1.1. Gain Access to Model Storage (e.g., S3 bucket, file system) and Replace Models with Malicious Ones [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] 3.1.2. Lack of Model Integrity Checks [CRITICAL NODE] [CRITICAL HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └── [CRITICAL HIGH RISK PATH] 3.1.2.1. Application Loads Models Without Verifying Integrity (e.g., Checksums, Signatures), Allowing for Tampering [CRITICAL HIGH RISK PATH] │ └── [CRITICAL NODE] 3.2. Overly Permissive MXNet Execution Environment [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.2.2. Insufficient Sandboxing or Isolation [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.2.2.1. MXNet Process Runs with Excessive Privileges, Allowing for System-Level Compromise if Exploited [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via MXNet Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the overall goal of the attacker and the root of all attack paths. Successful compromise means the attacker has achieved their objective through exploiting MXNet or its integration.
  • Risk Level: Critical - Represents complete failure of security related to MXNet.

Attack Tree Path: 2. [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit Malicious Model Input [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attacks that involve providing malicious input to the MXNet model, either as a model file or as input data during inference. This is a broad category encompassing several high-risk vectors.

  • Risk Level: Critical - Direct interaction with the model, bypassing typical application security layers.

    • 2.1. [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Supply Malicious Model File [CRITICAL NODE]

      • Description: The attacker provides a crafted model file to the application, aiming to exploit vulnerabilities during model loading or to manipulate application behavior through a poisoned model.

      • Risk Level: Critical - Direct control over the model loaded by the application.

        • 2.1.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.1.1. Deserialization Vulnerability Exploitation [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in MXNet's model deserialization process (e.g., when loading .params, .json, .symbol files). A crafted model file can trigger these vulnerabilities.
          • 1.1.1.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] Execute Arbitrary Code via Crafted Model File (.params, .json, .symbol) [HIGH RISK PATH]
            • Description: The attacker crafts a malicious model file that, when loaded, exploits a deserialization vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the server running the application.
            • Likelihood: Medium (If vulnerabilities exist in MXNet or custom deserialization)
            • Impact: Critical (Full system compromise, data breach, service disruption)
            • Effort: Medium (Requires vulnerability research or finding existing exploits)
            • Skill Level: Medium-High (Reverse engineering, exploit development)
            • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be difficult to detect during model loading, might be detected by runtime monitoring if code execution is obvious)

    • 2.2. 1.2.1.3. Exploit Logic Bugs in Custom Operators (if application uses them) [HIGH RISK PATH]

      • Attack Vector: If the application uses custom operators built with MXNet, vulnerabilities in the logic or implementation of these operators can be exploited.
      • 1.2.1.3.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] Identify and Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application-Specific Custom Operators Built with MXNet [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Description: The attacker identifies and exploits logic flaws, memory management issues, or other vulnerabilities in custom operators specifically developed for the application.
        • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on custom operator security)
        • Impact: High-Critical (Depends on custom operator function)
        • Effort: Medium (Requires understanding of custom operator code, potentially reverse engineering)
        • Skill Level: Medium (Programming skills, understanding of custom operator implementation)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Requires code review and testing of custom operators, runtime monitoring of their behavior)

Attack Tree Path: 3. [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit MXNet Software Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attacks that directly target vulnerabilities within the MXNet software itself, including known CVEs and potentially 0-day vulnerabilities.

  • Risk Level: Critical - Exploiting core MXNet functionality can have widespread and severe consequences.

    • 3.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.1. Exploit Known MXNet Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]
      • Description: Exploiting publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the version of MXNet used by the application.
      • 3.1.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.1.1. Leverage Publicly Disclosed Vulnerabilities (CVEs) [HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Attack Vector: Utilizing known CVEs for MXNet. Publicly available exploits might exist, making this attack easier to execute if the application uses a vulnerable MXNet version.
        • 3.1.1.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] Identify and Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in the Application's MXNet Version [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Description: The attacker identifies the MXNet version used by the application and checks for known CVEs. If vulnerabilities are found and exploitable, they are leveraged to compromise the application.
          • Likelihood: Low-Medium (If outdated MXNet is used)
          • Impact: Critical (Depends on CVE)
          • Effort: Low-Medium (If exploit exists)
          • Skill Level: Low-High (Depends on exploit)
          • Detection Difficulty: Low-Medium

Attack Tree Path: 4. [CRITICAL NODE] 3. Exploit Weaknesses in MXNet Integration and Configuration [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attacks that exploit weaknesses in how MXNet is integrated into the application and how the overall environment is configured. These are often related to misconfigurations and insecure practices.

  • Risk Level: Critical - Configuration and integration issues can create easily exploitable pathways into the application.

    • 4.1. [CRITICAL NODE] 3.1. Insecure Model Storage and Access [CRITICAL NODE]

      • Description: Weaknesses in how model files are stored and accessed, allowing unauthorized modification or replacement of models.

      • Risk Level: Critical - Compromised models can directly manipulate application behavior.

        • 4.1.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.1.1. Compromise Model Repository [HIGH RISK PATH]

          • Attack Vector: Gaining unauthorized access to the storage location of model files (e.g., S3 bucket, file system) due to misconfigurations or weak access controls.
          • 4.1.1.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] Gain Access to Model Storage (e.g., S3 bucket, file system) and Replace Models with Malicious Ones [HIGH RISK PATH]
            • Description: The attacker gains access to the model repository and replaces legitimate models with malicious ones, leading to model poisoning when the application loads these tampered models.
            • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on storage security)
            • Impact: High (Model poisoning, business logic compromise, potentially code execution if malicious models are crafted)
            • Effort: Low-Medium (Depends on storage security, could be as simple as finding misconfigured public buckets)
            • Skill Level: Low-Medium (Basic cloud security knowledge, reconnaissance skills)
            • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Access logs can be monitored, but detecting model replacement might require integrity checks)

        • 4.1.2. [CRITICAL NODE] 3.1.2. Lack of Model Integrity Checks [CRITICAL NODE] [CRITICAL HIGH RISK PATH]

          • Attack Vector: The application loads model files without verifying their integrity (e.g., using checksums or digital signatures). This allows for easy tampering if model storage is compromised or if an attacker can intercept model delivery.
          • 4.1.2.1. [CRITICAL HIGH RISK PATH] Application Loads Models Without Verifying Integrity (e.g., Checksums, Signatures), Allowing for Tampering [CRITICAL HIGH RISK PATH]
            • Description: The application's failure to validate model integrity makes it highly vulnerable to model poisoning. If an attacker can modify the model files in storage or during transit, the application will unknowingly load and use a malicious model.
            • Likelihood: High (Common oversight)
            • Impact: High (Model poisoning, business logic compromise, potentially code execution if malicious models are crafted)
            • Effort: Low (No exploit development needed, relies on application weakness)
            • Skill Level: Low (Basic understanding of application logic)
            • Detection Difficulty: Low (Easy to detect if integrity checks are implemented, hard if not - requires code review)

    • 4.2. [CRITICAL NODE] 3.2. Overly Permissive MXNet Execution Environment [CRITICAL NODE]

      • Description: The environment in which the MXNet process runs has excessive privileges, increasing the potential damage if an exploit within MXNet is successful.

      • Risk Level: Critical - Broadens the impact of any successful MXNet exploit to the entire system.

        • 4.2.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] 3.2.2. Insufficient Sandboxing or Isolation [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Attack Vector: Lack of proper sandboxing or isolation for the MXNet process. If the process runs with high privileges, a successful exploit within MXNet can escalate to system-level compromise.
          • 4.2.2.1. [HIGH RISK PATH] MXNet Process Runs with Excessive Privileges, Allowing for System-Level Compromise if Exploited [HIGH RISK PATH]
            • Description: The MXNet process is not sufficiently isolated and runs with unnecessary privileges. If an attacker manages to exploit a vulnerability in MXNet, they can leverage these excessive privileges to gain control over the underlying system.
            • Likelihood: Medium (Common misconfiguration)
            • Impact: High-Critical (System-wide compromise if MXNet is exploited)
            • Effort: Low (No exploit development needed, relies on misconfiguration)
            • Skill Level: Low (Basic system administration knowledge)
            • Detection Difficulty: Low (Security audits and configuration reviews can detect this)