Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (48 loc) · 6.27 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (48 loc) · 6.27 KB

Threat Model Analysis for apache/mxnet

Threat: Malicious Model Loading

Description: An attacker provides a crafted model file. When MXNet loads this model, vulnerabilities in MXNet's model parsing process are exploited, leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service. The attacker might distribute this malicious model through compromised channels or seemingly legitimate sources. Impact:

  • Code Execution: Full control of the server, potentially leading to data breaches and system compromise.
  • Denial of Service: Application downtime and service disruption due to crashes or resource exhaustion. MXNet Component Affected: Model loading and deserialization modules and functions within MXNet (e.g., mx.mod.Module.load, mx.nd.load). Native code components responsible for parsing model files. Risk Severity: Critical Mitigation Strategies:
  • Model Source Validation: Strictly validate the source of model files. Only load models from highly trusted and verified origins. Implement cryptographic verification if possible.
  • Regular MXNet Updates: Keep MXNet updated to the latest stable version to ensure you have the latest security patches for model loading vulnerabilities.
  • Input Sanitization (Model Metadata): If model metadata is processed before loading, sanitize and validate this data to prevent injection attacks.
  • Sandboxing (Model Loading): Consider loading models within a sandboxed environment to limit the potential damage from a successful exploit.

Threat: Operator Buffer Overflow

Description: An attacker crafts specific input data or model configurations that trigger a buffer overflow vulnerability within one of MXNet's operators (layers, activation functions, etc.). This could be achieved by exploiting edge cases or providing inputs exceeding expected boundaries for specific operators. Impact:

  • Code Execution: Arbitrary code execution on the server hosting the MXNet application.
  • Denial of Service: Application crashes or instability leading to service disruption.
  • Information Disclosure: Potential memory leaks that could expose sensitive data. MXNet Component Affected: MXNet's built-in operators implemented in C++ (e.g., Convolution, Pooling, Dense layers, activation functions). Native code execution paths within these operators. Risk Severity: Critical Mitigation Strategies:
  • Regular MXNet Updates: Ensure MXNet is updated to the latest version to benefit from patches addressing operator vulnerabilities.
  • Input Validation and Sanitization: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all input data before it is processed by MXNet models. Enforce data type, range, and format constraints.
  • Fuzzing and Security Testing: Conduct regular fuzzing and security testing of the application and its MXNet integration to proactively identify potential operator vulnerabilities.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerability Exploitation

Description: MXNet relies on various third-party libraries (e.g., BLAS, cuDNN, NCCL). An attacker exploits known security vulnerabilities present in these dependencies that are utilized by MXNet. This attack vector targets vulnerabilities within MXNet's dependency chain. Impact:

  • Code Execution: Exploiting vulnerabilities in dependencies can lead to arbitrary code execution within the MXNet process and potentially the host system.
  • Denial of Service: Vulnerabilities in dependencies can cause instability, crashes, or resource exhaustion in MXNet, leading to application downtime.
  • Information Disclosure: Some dependency vulnerabilities might allow for unauthorized information disclosure. MXNet Component Affected: MXNet's dependency management and its integration with external libraries like BLAS, cuDNN, NCCL, and others. The vulnerabilities reside within the external libraries themselves, but are exploitable through MXNet's usage. Risk Severity: High Mitigation Strategies:
  • Dependency Management: Maintain a comprehensive inventory of all MXNet dependencies and their specific versions.
  • Regular Dependency Updates: Proactively update dependencies to their latest secure versions. Utilize dependency scanning tools to automatically identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies.
  • Vulnerability Monitoring: Continuously monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases for MXNet and all its dependencies. Implement a process for promptly patching or mitigating identified vulnerabilities.

Threat: Code Injection in Custom Operators

Description: If the application utilizes custom operators (user-defined operators extending MXNet's functionality), vulnerabilities in the implementation of these custom operators, particularly those written in C++, can lead to code injection. Attackers could exploit weaknesses in input handling or system interactions within custom operators to inject and execute arbitrary code on the server. Impact:

  • Code Execution: Full control of the server, allowing for complete system compromise, data breaches, and malicious activities. MXNet Component Affected: Custom operators implemented by developers and integrated into MXNet. Specifically, the native code execution paths within these custom operators are vulnerable. Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the severity of the vulnerability in the custom operator and its privileges) Mitigation Strategies:
  • Secure Coding Practices (Custom Operators): Adhere to strict secure coding practices when developing custom operators. Thoroughly sanitize all inputs, avoid unsafe system calls, and implement robust input validation.
  • Code Reviews and Security Audits (Custom Operators): Mandatory and rigorous code reviews and security audits of all custom operator implementations should be performed by security experts.
  • Sandboxing/Isolation (Custom Operators): Consider sandboxing or isolating the execution environment of custom operators to limit the potential impact of vulnerabilities. Employ the principle of least privilege when granting permissions to custom operators.
  • Input Validation within Custom Operators: Implement strong input validation and error handling directly within the custom operator code to prevent unexpected behavior and potential exploits.