Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (58 loc) · 7.51 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

77 lines (58 loc) · 7.51 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/mxnet

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Model Source and Checksum Verification (MXNet-Specific Aspects)

  • Description:

    1. Trusted Source Definition: Define a clear policy for where MXNet models (.params, .json for symbols) are allowed to be loaded from.
    2. Checksum Verification (MXNet Loading): Within the Python code that uses mxnet.gluon.nn.SymbolBlock.imports (or similar loading functions like mx.mod.Module.load or mx.ndarray.load), implement the checksum verification logic:
      • Calculate the SHA-256/SHA-512 checksum of the downloaded model files before passing them to MXNet's loading functions.
      • Compare the calculated checksum against the expected checksum.
      • Raise an mxnet.MXNetError (or a custom exception) and abort loading if the checksums do not match. Do not proceed to call any MXNet loading functions.
    3. Integration with MXNet's Error Handling: Ensure that any exceptions raised during checksum verification are properly caught and handled by the application, preventing any partial loading or execution of a potentially compromised model.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Arbitrary Code Execution via Malicious MXNet Models (Severity: Critical): Prevents MXNet from loading and executing a maliciously crafted model file, which could contain arbitrary code due to vulnerabilities in the deserialization process.
    • Model Tampering (Severity: High): Ensures that the MXNet model files haven't been altered during transit or storage.

  • Impact:

    • Arbitrary Code Execution: Risk reduced from Critical to Very Low.
    • Model Tampering: Risk reduced from High to Low.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Checksum verification is implemented directly within the load_pretrained_model() function in model_loader.py, before calling mxnet.gluon.nn.SymbolBlock.imports.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • The load_experimental_model.py script (used by researchers) bypasses the model_loader.py module and directly uses mx.ndarray.load without checksum verification.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Data Validation and Sanitization (MXNet-Specific Aspects)

  • Description:

    1. MXNet Data Type Enforcement: Use MXNet's data types (e.g., mx.float32, mx.uint8, mx.int64) when creating mx.nd.array objects for input data. This enforces the expected data type at the MXNet level.
    2. Shape Validation (MXNet Context): Before feeding data to an MXNet model (e.g., before calling module.forward() or predictor.predict()), explicitly check the shape of the input mx.nd.array against the expected shape. Use input_data.shape and compare it to the model's expected input shape.
    3. Range Validation (MXNet-Aware): If the model has specific input range requirements (e.g., pixel values between 0 and 1), perform range checks after creating the mx.nd.array but before passing it to the model. You can use MXNet's functions for this (e.g., mx.nd.clip).
    4. Context-Specific Validation: If using GPUs (mx.gpu()), ensure that input validation is performed before moving data to the GPU. Avoid unnecessary data transfers to the GPU if the input is invalid.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Adversarial Examples (Severity: High): Makes it more difficult for adversarial examples to exploit subtle vulnerabilities in the model by enforcing expected data types and ranges.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed Input (Severity: Medium): Prevents MXNet from crashing or consuming excessive resources due to unexpectedly large or invalid input tensors.
    • Integer Overflow/Underflow in MXNet Operations (Severity: Medium): By validating input shapes and ranges, reduces the risk of integer overflows/underflows within MXNet's internal calculations.

  • Impact:

    • Adversarial Examples: Risk reduced from High to Medium.
    • DoS: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
    • Integer Overflow/Underflow: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Data type and shape validation are performed using MXNet's mx.nd.array and .shape attribute within the data_preprocessing.py module, before calling model.forward().

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Range validation is not consistently applied to all input types. It's implemented for image data but missing for text data.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Custom Operator/Layer Implementation (MXNet-Specific Aspects)

  • Description:

    1. Memory Management (MXNet C++ API): If implementing custom operators in C++ using MXNet's C++ API, pay extreme attention to memory management. Use MXNet's memory management functions (e.g., mxnet::Engine::Get()->NewVariable()) correctly to avoid memory leaks, buffer overflows, and use-after-free errors. Avoid raw pointer manipulation whenever possible.
    2. Input Validation (C++ API): Within the custom operator's C++ code, rigorously validate the input tensors' shapes, data types, and values before performing any calculations. Use MXNet's C++ API functions to access tensor properties.
    3. Error Handling (MXNet Exceptions): Use MXNet's exception handling mechanisms (e.g., CHECK macros, try-catch blocks) to gracefully handle errors and prevent crashes. Throw appropriate MXNet exceptions to signal errors to the higher-level Python code.
    4. NDArray API: Prefer using the NDArray API for manipulating tensors within custom operators, as it provides a higher level of abstraction and reduces the risk of manual memory management errors.
    5. Fuzz Testing with MXNet: Create fuzz tests that specifically target your custom MXNet operators. These tests should generate random mx.nd.array inputs (with varying shapes, data types, and values) and feed them to the operator, checking for crashes or unexpected behavior. Use MXNet's testing utilities to integrate these tests.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities in Custom Operators (Severity: High to Critical): Directly addresses the risk of buffer overflows, use-after-free errors, and other memory safety issues within custom C++/CUDA code.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Custom Operators (Severity: Medium): Prevents crashes or excessive resource consumption caused by malformed inputs to custom operators.
    • Code Injection via Custom Operators (Severity: Critical): If memory corruption vulnerabilities exist, they could be exploited for code injection; this mitigation directly reduces that risk.

  • Impact:

    • Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities: Risk significantly reduced.
    • DoS: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
    • Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Code reviews specifically check for memory safety in custom C++ operators.
    • MXNet's CHECK macros are used for basic input validation within the C++ code.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Fuzz testing specifically targeting the custom MXNet operators is not yet implemented.
    • More comprehensive use of MXNet's memory management functions could be adopted to further reduce reliance on manual memory management.