Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
151 lines (131 loc) · 9.41 KB

File metadata and controls

151 lines (131 loc) · 9.41 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/thrift

Objective: Compromise application using Apache Thrift to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE), Data Breach, or Denial of Service (DoS).

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Thrift Application
├───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Thrift Protocol Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Serialization/Deserialization Flaws [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───(AND)─ Buffer Overflow in Deserialization [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───(AND)─ Integer Overflow in Deserialization [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───(AND)─ Deserialization Gadgets (Language Specific) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   └───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Denial of Service (Protocol Level) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       ├───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Malformed Request Flooding [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       ├───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Large Payload Attacks [HIGH RISK PATH]
├───(OR)─ Exploit Implementation Vulnerabilities (Thrift Libraries & Generated Code)
│   ├───(OR)─ Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Dependencies of Thrift Libraries [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   └───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Code Generation Flaws [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └───(AND)─ Insecure Code Generation Patterns [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Missing Security Checks in Generated Code [HIGH RISK PATH]
├───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Transport Layer Vulnerabilities (Thrift Specific) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Insecure Transport Configuration [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Unencrypted Transport (Plain TCP Sockets) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   └───(OR)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Transport Layer DoS [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Connection Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting weaknesses inherent in the Thrift protocol itself, independent of specific implementations.
    • Focuses on vulnerabilities arising from the protocol's design and structure.
  • Sub-Categories:
    • Serialization/Deserialization Flaws
    • Denial of Service (Protocol Level)
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities during the process of converting data to and from the Thrift binary format.
    • Attackers manipulate serialized data to trigger flaws during deserialization on the server.
  • Specific Attack Types:
    • Buffer Overflow in Deserialization [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: High (RCE, Memory Corruption)
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Medium
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Description: Injecting oversized data in the serialized format to overwrite memory buffers during deserialization, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution.
    • Integer Overflow in Deserialization [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: High (Memory Corruption, Potential RCE)
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Medium
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Description: Manipulating integer fields in serialized data to cause integer overflows during deserialization, leading to memory corruption and potential RCE.
    • Deserialization Gadgets (Language Specific) [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Low
      • Impact: High (RCE)
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: High
      • Detection Difficulty: High
      • Description: Crafting serialized payloads that trigger chains of existing code ("gadgets") in the target language runtime during deserialization, ultimately achieving Remote Code Execution.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Overwhelming the server with protocol-compliant or slightly malformed Thrift requests to exhaust resources and cause service disruption.
    • Exploiting protocol-level weaknesses to create resource exhaustion.
  • Specific Attack Types:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Malformed Request Flooding [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: High
      • Impact: Medium (DoS)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low
      • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Description: Sending a large volume of intentionally malformed Thrift requests to consume server resources (CPU, memory, connections) and cause Denial of Service.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Large Payload Attacks [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium (DoS, Resource exhaustion)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low
      • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Description: Sending extremely large serialized payloads to overload server memory, bandwidth, or processing capacity, leading to Denial of Service.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries that the Thrift libraries depend on.
    • Indirectly attacking Thrift applications by targeting their dependencies.
  • Description: Thrift libraries often rely on other libraries for various functionalities. If these dependencies have known vulnerabilities, attackers can exploit them through the Thrift application. Regular dependency scanning and updates are crucial.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities introduced during the code generation process from Thrift IDL definitions.
    • Flaws can arise from insecure code generation patterns or bugs in the code generator itself.
  • Sub-Categories:
    • Insecure Code Generation Patterns [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Low
      • Impact: High (Injection vulnerabilities, RCE, Data Breach)
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Medium
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Description: The Thrift code generator might produce code with inherent security weaknesses, such as susceptibility to injection vulnerabilities (SQL, Command Injection) if the IDL and application logic are not carefully designed.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Missing Security Checks in Generated Code [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium (Injection vulnerabilities, Data corruption, Unexpected behavior)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Description: The generated code might lack necessary input validation or sanitization. Attackers can exploit this by providing malicious input via Thrift requests, leading to injection vulnerabilities or other security issues.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting weaknesses in the transport layer used for Thrift communication.
    • Focuses on vulnerabilities related to how Thrift messages are transmitted and received.
  • Sub-Categories:
    • Insecure Transport Configuration
    • Transport Layer DoS
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Misconfigurations in the transport layer setup that weaken security.
    • Primarily related to encryption and authentication settings.
  • Specific Attack Types:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Unencrypted Transport (Plain TCP Sockets) [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium (Information Disclosure, MITM)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low
      • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Description: Using plain TCP sockets without encryption for Thrift communication. This allows attackers to eavesdrop on or modify Thrift messages in transit (Man-in-the-Middle attacks).
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting transport layer features or limitations to cause Denial of Service.
    • Focuses on exhausting server resources at the transport level.
  • Specific Attack Types:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Connection Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]:
      • Likelihood: High
      • Impact: Medium (DoS)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Low
      • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Description: Opening a large number of connections to the Thrift server to exhaust its connection resources and prevent legitimate clients from connecting, leading to Denial of Service.