Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
74 lines (65 loc) · 11 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

74 lines (65 loc) · 11 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for apache/thrift

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization (Thrift-Specific Focus)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization (Thrift-Specific)
  • Description:
    1. Focus on Deserialized Thrift Data: Specifically target validation and sanitization after Thrift deserialization. Thrift handles type checking during deserialization, but this strategy goes beyond type checks.
    2. Validate Semantic Meaning of Thrift Fields: Define validation rules based on the meaning of fields defined in your Thrift IDL. For example, if an IDL field represents a price, validate that it's a positive number within a reasonable range.
    3. Sanitize Thrift Data for Downstream Systems: If deserialized Thrift data is used in SQL queries or system commands, sanitize it after deserialization but before passing it to these systems. This prevents injection attacks originating from malicious data embedded within valid Thrift structures.
    4. Limit Payload Size at Transport Level (Thrift Transport): Configure payload size limits at the Thrift transport layer (e.g., using transport-specific options in Netty or other transports used with Thrift). This directly limits the size of Thrift messages processed.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Injection Attacks via Malicious Thrift Payloads - Severity: High (SQL Injection, Command Injection, etc. originating from data within Thrift messages)
    • Data Integrity Issues due to Semantically Invalid Thrift Data - Severity: Medium (Application logic errors caused by unexpected data values within valid Thrift structures)
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Large Thrift Payloads - Severity: Low (DoS by sending excessively large Thrift messages)
  • Impact:
    • Injection Attacks: High reduction - Directly prevents injection attacks that exploit vulnerabilities by embedding malicious code within Thrift data structures.
    • Data Integrity Issues: High reduction - Ensures that data processed by the application, after Thrift deserialization, is semantically valid and consistent with business logic.
    • Denial of Service: Low reduction - Partially mitigates DoS by limiting the processing of large Thrift messages at the transport level.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic type validation is inherent in Thrift deserialization. Semantic validation and sanitization of deserialized Thrift data are missing in many services. Transport level payload limits are configured for some services using Netty. Implemented in: UserService, ProductService (basic type validation and some transport limits).
  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive semantic validation and sanitization of deserialized Thrift data are missing across most Thrift service methods. Sanitization specifically for downstream systems using Thrift data is largely absent. Needs to be implemented in: OrderService, PaymentService, ReportingService, and enhanced in UserService, ProductService for semantic validation and sanitization.

Mitigation Strategy: Transport Layer Security (TLS/SSL) for Thrift

  • Mitigation Strategy: Transport Layer Security (TLS/SSL) for Thrift
  • Description:
    1. Utilize Thrift's Secure Transports: Specifically use Thrift's built-in support for secure transports like TSSLSocketFactory (Java), TSocketPool with SSL context (Python), or equivalent for your language. These are designed to integrate TLS/SSL directly with Thrift communication.
    2. Configure Thrift Server and Client for TLS: Configure both your Thrift server and client code to use these secure transports. This involves specifying certificate paths, key stores, and TLS/SSL protocol versions within the Thrift transport configuration.
    3. Enforce TLS for All Production Thrift Communication: Ensure that all Thrift communication in production environments uses TLS/SSL. Disable or prevent the use of insecure Thrift transports like plain TSocket in production configurations.
    4. Consider Mutual TLS (mTLS) in Thrift: For enhanced authentication, explore implementing mutual TLS using Thrift's secure transport capabilities. This requires configuring both server and client to present certificates during the Thrift handshake.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Eavesdropping on Thrift Communication (Confidentiality) - Severity: High (Interception of sensitive data transmitted via Thrift)
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on Thrift Connections - Severity: High (Interception and manipulation of Thrift traffic)
    • Data Tampering during Thrift Transmission (Integrity) - Severity: Medium (Modification of Thrift messages in transit)
  • Impact:
    • Eavesdropping: High reduction - Encrypts Thrift communication, preventing eavesdropping on sensitive data exchanged via Thrift.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High reduction - Authenticates the Thrift server and encrypts communication, mitigating MitM attacks targeting Thrift connections.
    • Data Tampering: Medium reduction - TLS provides integrity checks for Thrift messages in transit, reducing the risk of undetected tampering.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. TLS/SSL is enabled for external facing Thrift services (UserService, ProductService). Internal Thrift services and backend communication are not consistently secured with TLS. Implemented in: UserService (external), ProductService (external) using Thrift's TSSLSocketFactory.
  • Missing Implementation: TLS/SSL needs to be enforced for all Thrift communication, including internal services (OrderService, PaymentService, ReportingService) and backend component communication using Thrift's secure transport mechanisms. Needs to be implemented in: OrderService, PaymentService, ReportingService, internal Thrift communication paths, ensuring consistent use of Thrift's TLS features.

Mitigation Strategy: Protocol Definition (IDL) Security - Thrift Specific

  • Mitigation Strategy: Protocol Definition (IDL) Security - Thrift Specific
  • Description:
    1. Restrict Access to Thrift IDL Files: Control access to your .thrift IDL files. Treat them as sensitive design documents that reveal your service structure. Use access control mechanisms to limit who can view or modify these files.
    2. Version Control and Audit Thrift IDL Changes: Use version control for your IDL files and implement a change management process. Track changes to the IDL, as modifications can impact service compatibility and potentially introduce vulnerabilities if not carefully reviewed.
    3. Minimize Sensitive Information in Thrift IDL Comments: Avoid placing sensitive information or internal implementation details in comments within your Thrift IDL files. While comments are not directly compiled, they can be exposed through generated documentation or code and could aid attackers in understanding your system.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure via IDL Exposure - Severity: Medium (Revealing service structure and data models through public IDL)
    • Security Misconfigurations due to Uncontrolled IDL Changes - Severity: Medium (Introducing vulnerabilities or breaking security assumptions through IDL modifications)
    • Reconnaissance by Attackers using IDL Information - Severity: Low (Attackers gaining insights into the system from exposed IDL, aiding in attack planning)
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure: Medium reduction - Prevents unintentional disclosure of service architecture and data structures by limiting access to IDL files.
    • Security Misconfigurations: Medium reduction - Reduces the risk of security issues arising from poorly managed or unreviewed changes to the Thrift IDL.
    • Reconnaissance: Low reduction - Makes it slightly harder for attackers to gather information about the system by controlling IDL access.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Access to the main IDL repository is restricted to development team. Version control is used for IDL files. Comments are not actively reviewed for sensitive information. Implemented in: IDL repository access control, version control system.
  • Missing Implementation: Formal process for reviewing IDL changes for security implications is missing. Active review of comments in IDL files for sensitive information is not performed. Needs to be implemented in: IDL change management process, regular review of IDL comments.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Generation and Review (Thrift Generated Code)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Code Generation and Review (Thrift Generated Code)
  • Description:
    1. Use Up-to-Date Thrift Compiler: Regularly update your Thrift compiler to the latest stable version. Newer versions often include security fixes and improvements in generated code.
    2. Review Generated Code for Security Issues: While Thrift generates code, perform security reviews of the generated code, especially for critical services. Look for potential vulnerabilities or inefficiencies introduced by the code generation process.
    3. Static Analysis on Thrift Generated Code: Use static analysis tools to scan the code generated by Thrift for potential security vulnerabilities. Treat the generated code as part of your application's codebase and subject it to security analysis.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Vulnerabilities in Thrift Generated Code - Severity: Medium (Bugs or security flaws introduced by the Thrift code generation process itself)
    • Inefficient or Insecure Code Patterns in Generated Code - Severity: Medium (Performance issues or security weaknesses resulting from the way Thrift generates code)
  • Impact:
    • Vulnerabilities in Generated Code: Medium reduction - Reduces the risk of using vulnerable Thrift compiler versions and identifies potential issues in the generated code.
    • Inefficient/Insecure Code Patterns: Medium reduction - Helps identify and address potential performance or security issues stemming from the code generation process.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Thrift compiler is updated periodically, but not always to the latest version immediately. Generated code is not routinely reviewed for security vulnerabilities or subjected to static analysis. Implemented in: Periodic compiler updates.
  • Missing Implementation: Regular security reviews of Thrift generated code are missing. Static analysis of generated code is not performed. Needs to be implemented in: Development workflow - include generated code review and static analysis in security checks.