Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
106 lines (81 loc) · 15.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

106 lines (81 loc) · 15.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for boostorg/boost

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Boost Library Updates

Description:

  1. Establish a process: Define a schedule (e.g., monthly, quarterly) to check for Boost library updates.
  2. Monitor Boost channels: Subscribe to the Boost mailing lists (e.g., boost-announce) and regularly check the official Boost website and GitHub repository for security advisories and new releases.
  3. Review release notes: When a new version is available, carefully review the release notes, paying close attention to security-related fixes and changes specifically for Boost libraries used in your project.
  4. Test in staging: Before updating in production, deploy the updated Boost libraries to a staging environment.
  5. Run regression tests: Execute a comprehensive suite of regression tests in the staging environment to ensure compatibility and identify any unintended side effects of the Boost library update, focusing on functionalities that utilize Boost.
  6. Deploy to production: After successful testing in staging, deploy the updated Boost libraries to the production environment.
  7. Document the update: Record the update in a change log, noting the Boost version updated and any security fixes included specifically for Boost.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Boost Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated Boost libraries are susceptible to publicly known vulnerabilities within Boost itself that attackers can exploit. Regular updates patch these Boost-specific vulnerabilities.
    • Zero-Day Boost Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): While updates don't directly prevent zero-day exploits in Boost, staying current reduces the window of opportunity for attackers to exploit newly discovered Boost vulnerabilities before patches are widely available.

  • Impact:

    • High Risk Reduction: Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation of known vulnerabilities within Boost libraries.
    • Medium Risk Reduction: Partially reduces the risk of zero-day exploits in Boost libraries by minimizing the attack surface of outdated Boost code.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Location: [Project Documentation/Dependency Management Plan - Example: "We have a documented process for monthly dependency checks, including Boost." - Project Specific - Replace with actual location]
    • Status: [Partially Implemented - Example: "We check for Boost updates quarterly, but the testing process specifically for Boost functionalities could be more rigorous." - Project Specific - Replace with actual status]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated Boost Update Checks: [Missing - Example: "Currently, Boost update checks are manual. We should automate this process using dependency scanning tools or scripts that specifically track Boost versions." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]
    • Boost-Focused Regression Testing: [Missing - Example: "Our regression test suite is not fully focused on testing functionalities that directly utilize Boost libraries after updates." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization (Boost.Asio & Boost.Regex)

Description:

  1. Identify Boost input points: Locate all points where your application receives external input that is directly processed using Boost.Asio (network data handled by Boost.Asio) or Boost.Regex (regex patterns used with Boost.Regex).
  2. Define Boost validation rules: For each Boost-related input point, define strict validation rules based on expected data types, formats, and ranges relevant to how Boost.Asio or Boost.Regex is used. For Boost.Regex, limit the complexity and length of user-provided regex patterns specifically for Boost.Regex usage.
  3. Implement Boost validation checks: Use Boost.Asio's input stream handling to validate network data before it's processed by Boost.Asio functionalities. For Boost.Regex, validate user-provided regex strings before using them with boost::regex.
  4. Sanitize Boost inputs: If direct validation is not possible for Boost-related inputs, sanitize inputs to remove or escape potentially harmful characters or patterns before they are used with Boost.Asio or Boost.Regex. For example, when using Boost.Regex with user input, escape special regex characters if the input is intended to be treated literally by Boost.Regex.
  5. Error Handling for Boost inputs: Implement robust error handling for invalid inputs intended for use with Boost libraries. Reject invalid inputs and log the rejection for monitoring and potential security incident investigation related to Boost input handling.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Buffer Overflow (Boost.Asio - High Severity): Insufficient input validation in network data processing within Boost.Asio usage can lead to buffer overflows if input exceeds expected buffer sizes managed by Boost.Asio.
    • Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) (Boost.Regex - High Severity): Unvalidated or overly complex user-provided regex patterns used with Boost.Regex can cause ReDoS attacks, consuming excessive CPU resources and leading to denial of service specifically due to Boost.Regex processing.
    • Injection Attacks (Boost.Regex - Medium Severity): If user input is directly used to construct regex patterns for Boost.Regex without proper sanitization, it could potentially lead to regex injection attacks within the context of Boost.Regex processing.

  • Impact:

    • High Risk Reduction: Significantly reduces the risk of buffer overflows in Boost.Asio and ReDoS attacks in Boost.Regex.
    • Medium Risk Reduction: Reduces the risk of regex injection attacks related to Boost.Regex.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Location: [Network Input Handlers using Boost.Asio, Regex Processing Modules using Boost.Regex - Example: "Input validation is implemented in our network request handlers that utilize Boost.Asio's stream extraction." - Project Specific - Replace with actual location]
    • Status: [Partially Implemented - Example: "We have basic input validation for network data processed by Boost.Asio, but regex validation for Boost.Regex usage is less comprehensive." - Project Specific - Replace with actual status]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Regex Complexity Limits for Boost.Regex: [Missing - Example: "We do not currently enforce limits on the complexity or length of user-provided regex patterns specifically used with Boost.Regex." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]
    • Centralized Boost Input Validation Library: [Missing - Example: "Input validation logic for Boost-related inputs is scattered across different modules. We should create a centralized validation library specifically for Boost input handling for consistency and maintainability." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]

Mitigation Strategy: Timeout Implementation (Boost.Asio & Boost.Regex)

Description:

  1. Identify Boost time-sensitive operations: Pinpoint operations using Boost.Asio (network operations) and Boost.Regex (regex matching) that could potentially take an excessive amount of time due to Boost library behavior, leading to resource exhaustion or denial of service.
  2. Set Boost timeouts: Configure timeouts specifically for these Boost-related operations. For Boost.Asio, use asynchronous operations with timeouts or timers provided by Boost.Asio. For Boost.Regex, use the boost::regex_match or boost::regex_search functions with timeout parameters if available in your Boost version (or implement manual timeout mechanisms if not directly supported by the Boost.Regex version you are using).
  3. Handle Boost timeouts gracefully: Implement error handling to gracefully manage timeout situations arising from Boost operations. Terminate the Boost operation, release resources used by Boost, and log the timeout event for monitoring related to Boost performance and potential issues.
  4. Tune Boost timeouts: Adjust timeout values based on expected Boost operation durations and acceptable latency. Too short timeouts for Boost operations can lead to false positives, while too long timeouts may not effectively prevent denial of service caused by slow Boost operations.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion (Boost.Asio & Boost.Regex - High Severity): Unbounded network operations in Boost.Asio or overly complex regex matching in Boost.Regex can consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, network connections), leading to denial of service specifically due to Boost library usage.
    • Slowloris Attacks (Boost.Asio - Medium Severity): Timeout mechanisms in Boost.Asio can help mitigate slowloris-style attacks that attempt to keep connections open indefinitely through Boost.Asio, exhausting server resources managed by Boost.Asio.
    • ReDoS Attacks (Boost.Regex - High Severity): Timeouts on regex matching operations in Boost.Regex are a crucial defense against ReDoS attacks by limiting the execution time of potentially malicious regex patterns processed by Boost.Regex.

  • Impact:

    • High Risk Reduction: Significantly reduces the risk of denial of service attacks caused by resource exhaustion from long-running Boost operations.
    • Medium Risk Reduction: Helps mitigate slowloris attacks when using Boost.Asio and effectively prevents ReDoS attacks when using Boost.Regex.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Location: [Network Connection Handling using Boost.Asio, Regex Processing Functions using Boost.Regex - Example: "Timeouts are configured for network connections in our Boost.Asio based server." - Project Specific - Replace with actual location]
    • Status: [Partially Implemented - Example: "Network connection timeouts are in place for Boost.Asio, but regex timeouts for Boost.Regex are not yet implemented." - Project Specific - Replace with actual status]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Regex Timeout Implementation for Boost.Regex: [Missing - Example: "We need to implement timeout mechanisms for all Boost.Regex operations, especially those processing user-provided patterns with Boost.Regex." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]
    • Boost Timeout Configuration Review: [Missing - Example: "The current timeout values for Boost.Asio need to be reviewed and potentially adjusted based on performance testing and expected workloads involving Boost.Asio." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Deserialization Practices (Boost.Serialization)

Description:

  1. Avoid deserializing untrusted data with Boost.Serialization: Minimize or eliminate deserialization of data from untrusted sources (e.g., user uploads, external network connections) using Boost.Serialization if possible.
  2. Schema Validation for Boost.Serialization: If deserialization from untrusted sources using Boost.Serialization is necessary, implement strict schema validation for serialized data before deserializing with Boost.Serialization. Define expected data structures and types and validate incoming data against this schema before Boost.Serialization processes it.
  3. Versioning in Boost.Serialization: Use versioning in Boost.Serialization to manage changes in data structures over time within Boost.Serialization. This helps prevent attacks that exploit inconsistencies between expected and actual data formats when using Boost.Serialization.
  4. Limit Deserialization Complexity in Boost.Serialization: Avoid deserializing deeply nested or excessively complex data structures with Boost.Serialization, as these can increase the attack surface and resource consumption during Boost.Serialization's deserialization process.
  5. Input Size Limits for Boost.Serialization: Enforce limits on the size of serialized data being deserialized by Boost.Serialization to prevent excessive memory allocation and potential denial-of-service attacks during Boost.Serialization operations.
  6. Consider Alternative Formats to Boost.Serialization: For handling untrusted data, consider using safer data formats like JSON or Protocol Buffers with well-established and actively maintained parsing libraries that have a stronger security track record than Boost.Serialization in untrusted contexts. Reduce reliance on Boost.Serialization for untrusted data.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities (Boost.Serialization - High Severity): Boost.Serialization, like many serialization libraries, can be vulnerable to deserialization attacks if used to process untrusted data. Attackers can craft malicious serialized data to exploit vulnerabilities within Boost.Serialization to execute arbitrary code, cause denial of service, or leak sensitive information.
    • Code Execution (Boost.Serialization - Critical Severity): In the worst-case scenario, deserialization vulnerabilities in Boost.Serialization can lead to remote code execution if attackers can manipulate the serialized data to inject and execute malicious code during the Boost.Serialization deserialization process.
    • Denial of Service (Boost.Serialization - High Severity): Malicious serialized data can be crafted to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) during Boost.Serialization deserialization, leading to denial of service.

  • Impact:

    • High to Critical Risk Reduction: Significantly reduces or eliminates the risk of deserialization vulnerabilities specifically related to Boost.Serialization, including remote code execution and denial of service.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Location: [Data Processing Modules using Boost.Serialization - Example: "We use Boost.Serialization for internal data persistence, but not for handling external user data with Boost.Serialization." - Project Specific - Replace with actual location]
    • Status: [Partially Implemented - Example: "We avoid deserializing external user data with Boost.Serialization, but schema validation for internal data deserialized by Boost.Serialization could be improved." - Project Specific - Replace with actual status]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Schema Validation for Boost.Serialization: [Missing - Example: "We need to implement schema validation for all Boost.Serialization deserialization operations, even for internal data processed by Boost.Serialization." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]
    • Alternative Serialization for Untrusted Data (Instead of Boost.Serialization): [Missing - Example: "We should evaluate and potentially switch to a safer serialization format like Protocol Buffers for handling any data that might originate from untrusted sources, instead of relying on Boost.Serialization for such data." - Project Specific - Replace with actual missing parts]