Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
96 lines (85 loc) · 11.2 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

96 lines (85 loc) · 11.2 KB

Threat Model Analysis for bvlc/caffe

Threat: Malicious Model Injection/Loading (Critical to High)

  • Threat: Malicious Model Injection/Loading
  • Description: An attacker provides or substitutes a legitimate Caffe model with a maliciously crafted one. When Caffe loads this model, it could exploit vulnerabilities during parsing or inference, or execute adversarial logic embedded within the model. This could be achieved by compromising model storage or intercepting model delivery.
  • Impact:
    • Code Execution: Attackers can achieve arbitrary code execution on the server running Caffe by exploiting model loading or inference vulnerabilities.
    • Denial of Service: A malicious model can be designed to crash Caffe or the application, leading to service disruption.
    • Information Disclosure: The model could be crafted to leak sensitive information during processing, if vulnerabilities allow memory access or data exfiltration.
    • Model Poisoning (Secondary): If the application retrains models, a malicious initial model can poison the training process from the outset.
  • Caffe Component Affected:
    • Model loading module (protobuf parsing, network definition parsing).
    • Inference engine (during model execution).
  • Risk Severity: Critical to High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Model Origin Validation: Only load models from highly trusted and rigorously verified sources. Implement a secure model supply chain.
    • Robust Model Integrity Checks: Employ strong cryptographic signatures and checksums to verify model integrity before loading.
    • Input Validation on Model Files: Perform deep validation of model file structure and content before parsing with Caffe to detect anomalies.
    • Sandboxing Model Processing: Isolate Caffe model loading and inference within a heavily sandboxed environment with minimal privileges to limit the impact of potential exploits.
    • Proactive Security Updates: Maintain Caffe at the latest version, applying all security patches promptly.

Threat: Adversarial Input Crafting (Framework Exploitation) (High)

  • Threat: Adversarial Input Crafting (Framework Exploitation)
  • Description: An attacker crafts specialized input data (e.g., images, numerical arrays) specifically designed to trigger vulnerabilities within Caffe's input processing mechanisms. This could target weaknesses in data layers, image decoding libraries, or data normalization routines within Caffe, leading to memory corruption or unexpected program states.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service: Malicious inputs can crash Caffe or the application by exploiting processing vulnerabilities.
    • Potential Code Execution: If input processing vulnerabilities lead to memory corruption, attackers might be able to achieve code execution.
    • Unpredictable Application Behavior: Exploiting input processing flaws can cause Caffe to produce incorrect or unreliable outputs, impacting application functionality.
  • Caffe Component Affected:
    • Data layers (e.g., ImageDataLayer, DataLayer, input preprocessing functions).
    • Image decoding libraries integrated with data layers (e.g., OpenCV, depending on Caffe build).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Comprehensive Input Data Validation and Sanitization: Implement rigorous validation and sanitization of all input data before it reaches Caffe. Enforce strict data type, format, and range checks.
    • Utilize Secure and Updated Libraries: Ensure all underlying libraries used by Caffe for data processing (especially image libraries) are kept up-to-date with the latest security patches and are from reputable sources.
    • Advanced Fuzz Testing: Conduct thorough fuzz testing specifically targeting Caffe's input processing components to proactively discover potential vulnerabilities.
    • Resource Limits and Monitoring: Implement resource limits for Caffe operations and monitor resource consumption to detect and mitigate potential resource exhaustion attacks triggered by malicious inputs.

Threat: Memory Safety Issues (Buffer Overflows, Use-After-Free) (Critical to High)

  • Threat: Memory Safety Issues (Buffer Overflows, Use-After-Free)
  • Description: Caffe, being written in C++, is susceptible to memory safety vulnerabilities inherent in the language. Bugs within Caffe's codebase can lead to buffer overflows, use-after-free conditions, and other memory corruption issues. These can be triggered by specific model structures, input data, or operational sequences within Caffe's modules. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities can grant attackers significant control.
  • Impact:
    • Code Execution: Memory safety vulnerabilities are prime targets for achieving arbitrary code execution on the system running Caffe.
    • Denial of Service: Memory corruption can lead to crashes and denial of service.
    • Information Disclosure: Attackers might be able to exploit memory vulnerabilities to read sensitive data from memory.
    • System Instability: Memory corruption can cause unpredictable application and system behavior.
  • Caffe Component Affected:
    • Core Caffe library code across all modules (layers, solvers, net definition, utility functions, etc.).
    • Vulnerabilities can arise in any part of the Caffe codebase due to the nature of C++.
  • Risk Severity: Critical to High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Continuous Security Updates: Prioritize keeping Caffe updated to the latest version to benefit from community security patches and bug fixes.
    • In-depth Code Audits and Analysis: Conduct regular and thorough static and dynamic code analysis of the Caffe codebase to proactively identify and remediate memory safety vulnerabilities.
    • Memory Sanitization in Development: Employ memory sanitizers (e.g., AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during development, testing, and continuous integration to detect memory errors early in the development lifecycle.
    • Secure C++ Coding Practices: Enforce and rigorously follow secure C++ coding practices within any application code that interacts with Caffe to minimize the introduction of new memory safety issues at the application level.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities (High to Critical)

  • Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities
  • Description: Caffe relies on a range of third-party libraries, including Protocol Buffers, BLAS libraries (OpenBLAS, MKL), CUDA/cuDNN (for GPU support), and various image processing libraries. Known vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be indirectly exploited through Caffe, as Caffe utilizes these libraries in its core functionality.
  • Impact:
    • Wide Range of Impacts: The impact depends heavily on the specific vulnerability in the dependency. It can range from denial of service and information disclosure to remote code execution and privilege escalation, depending on the affected library and the nature of the vulnerability.
    • System Compromise: Exploiting dependency vulnerabilities can lead to the compromise of the Caffe application and potentially the underlying operating system.
  • Caffe Component Affected:
    • Indirectly affects all Caffe components that depend on vulnerable libraries.
    • Specifically, components using protobuf for model handling, BLAS for numerical computations, CUDA/cuDNN for GPU acceleration, and image libraries for data input and preprocessing.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the severity of the vulnerability in the dependency).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Proactive Dependency Scanning and Management: Implement automated dependency scanning to continuously monitor Caffe's dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Utilize dependency management tools to track and manage versions.
    • Immediate Dependency Updates: Establish a process for promptly updating vulnerable dependencies to patched versions as soon as security updates are released. Subscribe to security advisories for all of Caffe's dependencies.
    • Vendor Security Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability disclosures from the vendors of Caffe's dependencies (e.g., protobuf project, BLAS library providers, NVIDIA for CUDA/cuDNN, etc.).
    • Dependency Isolation (if feasible): In advanced scenarios, consider techniques to isolate dependencies to limit the potential blast radius of a vulnerability in a single dependency.

Threat: Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Input/Model Driven) (High)

  • Threat: Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Input/Model Driven)
  • Description: Attackers can intentionally provide Caffe with excessively large or computationally complex inputs or attempt to load extremely resource-intensive models. This can overwhelm the server's resources (CPU, memory, GPU), leading to a denial of service. This attack vector exploits Caffe's inherent resource consumption characteristics when processing certain types of data or models.
  • Impact:
    • Application Unavailability: The Caffe-based application becomes unavailable to legitimate users due to resource exhaustion.
    • Performance Degradation: Even if not a complete outage, performance can severely degrade, making the application unusable.
    • System Instability or Crashes: In extreme cases, resource exhaustion can lead to system instability or crashes of the server running Caffe.
  • Caffe Component Affected:
    • Data layers (processing large input datasets).
    • Model loading module (loading very large or complex models).
    • Inference engine (processing computationally intensive models or large inputs).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Size and Complexity Limits: Implement and enforce rigorous limits on the size and complexity of input data (e.g., maximum image resolution, video duration, data array dimensions).
    • Model Complexity Governance: If possible, establish policies and mechanisms to control the complexity of models that can be loaded and processed, potentially based on model size, layer count, or parameter count.
    • Comprehensive Resource Monitoring and Alerting: Implement robust real-time resource monitoring (CPU, memory, GPU usage) for the server running Caffe and set up proactive alerts for unusual resource spikes.
    • Input Rate Limiting and Throttling: Implement rate limiting and request throttling mechanisms to prevent attackers from overwhelming the system with a flood of resource-intensive requests.
    • Resource Quotas and Process Isolation: Enforce resource quotas for Caffe processes to limit the maximum resources they can consume. Consider process isolation techniques to contain resource exhaustion within specific processes.