Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (53 loc) · 10.1 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

77 lines (53 loc) · 10.1 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for catchorg/catch2

Objective: Compromise Application that uses Catch2 by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities related to Catch2.

Attack Tree Visualization

[CRITICAL NODE] Root: Compromise Application using Catch2 └── [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit Misuse or Weaknesses in Application's Catch2 Test Suite [CRITICAL NODE] └── [CRITICAL NODE] 2.1. Information Leakage via Test Output [CRITICAL NODE] └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] 2.1.1. Accidental Exposure of Sensitive Data in Test Assertions/Output [CRITICAL NODE] └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.1.1.1. Hardcoded Credentials in Test Cases (e.g., API Keys, Passwords) └── [CRITICAL NODE] 2.4. Logic Bugs in Tests Masking Application Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] 2.4.1. Insufficient or Ineffective Test Coverage [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4.1.1. Missing Test Cases for Critical Functionality or Edge Cases [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4.1.2. Weak Assertions that don't properly validate the expected behavior [HIGH-RISK PATH] └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4.1.3. Tests that are easily bypassed or disabled (e.g., commented out, skipped conditionally without proper justification) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. [CRITICAL NODE] Root: Compromise Application using Catch2

  • Attack Vector: This is the overall goal. The attacker aims to compromise the application by leveraging weaknesses related to its use of the Catch2 testing framework.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: The attacker will focus on exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations within the application's test suite, rather than directly targeting Catch2 library code itself (which is less likely to be vulnerable).
  • Potential Impact: Full compromise of the application, including data breaches, unauthorized access, service disruption, and reputational damage.

Attack Tree Path: 2. [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit Misuse or Weaknesses in Application's Catch2 Test Suite [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: This is the primary attack surface. The attacker targets the application's test suite, which is built using Catch2, looking for vulnerabilities arising from how the tests are written, executed, or managed.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: This involves analyzing the test code, test data, test execution environment, and test output for weaknesses. Catch2 itself is a tool; the vulnerabilities arise from how the application team uses it.
  • Potential Impact: Information leakage, denial of service of test environments, code execution in test environments (less likely but possible), and most critically, undetected vulnerabilities in the application itself due to flawed testing.

Attack Tree Path: 3. [CRITICAL NODE] 2.1. Information Leakage via Test Output [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: The attacker exploits the test output generated by Catch2 during test execution to gain sensitive information.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: Catch2 is designed to provide detailed test output. If test cases or the test environment are not carefully configured, this output can inadvertently reveal sensitive data. Attackers can monitor test logs, CI/CD pipelines, or even publicly accessible test results.
  • Potential Impact: Exposure of credentials, internal system details, business logic, PII, or other confidential information. This information can be used for reconnaissance, further attacks, or direct data breaches.

Attack Tree Path: 4. [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] 2.1.1. Accidental Exposure of Sensitive Data in Test Assertions/Output [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Sensitive data is unintentionally included directly within test cases or is revealed in the standard output generated by Catch2 during test execution (e.g., in assertion messages, error reports, or general logging).
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: Developers might mistakenly hardcode credentials, API keys, internal paths, or real-world data into test cases for convenience or lack of awareness. Catch2's verbose output can then expose this data.
  • Potential Impact: High impact if credentials or PII are exposed, leading to account compromise, data breaches, and privacy violations. Medium impact for exposure of internal system details, aiding reconnaissance.

Attack Tree Path: 5. [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.1.1.1. Hardcoded Credentials in Test Cases (e.g., API Keys, Passwords)

  • Attack Vector: Developers directly embed sensitive credentials (passwords, API keys, tokens) within the test code itself.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: These hardcoded credentials become part of the test suite. When tests are executed, Catch2 might output these credentials in logs or reports, or the test code itself might be accessible to attackers (e.g., in public repositories).
  • Potential Impact: Direct compromise of accounts or systems protected by the hardcoded credentials. This is a very high-impact vulnerability due to the direct access it grants.

Attack Tree Path: 6. [CRITICAL NODE] 2.4. Logic Bugs in Tests Masking Application Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: The test suite itself contains flaws in its logic or design, leading to a false sense of security. Critical vulnerabilities in the application are not detected because the tests are ineffective.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: This is not about exploiting Catch2 directly, but about the quality of the tests written using Catch2. Poorly designed tests, insufficient coverage, or weak assertions can fail to detect real vulnerabilities in the application code being tested.
  • Potential Impact: High impact because critical vulnerabilities in the application remain undetected and can be exploited in production, leading to any type of application compromise. This is an indirect but very significant threat.

Attack Tree Path: 7. [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] 2.4.1. Insufficient or Ineffective Test Coverage [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: The test suite does not adequately cover all critical functionalities, code paths, or edge cases of the application.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: Developers might not write enough tests, or might focus on happy paths and miss important negative scenarios or boundary conditions. Catch2 provides the framework, but the scope and depth of testing are determined by the development team.
  • Potential Impact: High impact because vulnerabilities in untested areas of the code will likely remain undetected and exploitable in production.

Attack Tree Path: 8. [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4.1.1. Missing Test Cases for Critical Functionality or Edge Cases [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Specific critical features or unusual input scenarios are not tested at all.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: If developers fail to identify and test critical functionalities (e.g., authentication, authorization, data validation) or forget to test edge cases (e.g., handling of invalid input, error conditions), vulnerabilities in these areas will be missed.
  • Potential Impact: High impact as vulnerabilities in critical functionalities can be directly exploited to compromise the application's core security mechanisms.

Attack Tree Path: 9. [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4.1.2. Weak Assertions that don't properly validate the expected behavior [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Tests are written, but the assertions used to verify the results are too weak or incorrect, allowing flawed code to pass the tests.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: Developers might use superficial assertions that only check for basic success without thoroughly validating the actual output or behavior. Catch2 provides flexible assertion mechanisms, but their effectiveness depends on how they are used.
  • Potential Impact: High impact because tests might pass even when the application code is vulnerable, leading to a false sense of security and deployment of vulnerable code.

Attack Tree Path: 10. [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.4.1.3. Tests that are easily bypassed or disabled (e.g., commented out, skipped conditionally without proper justification) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Tests that were initially designed to provide security assurance are later disabled, commented out, or conditionally skipped without proper review or justification.
  • Exploitation in Catch2 Context: Developers might disable failing tests temporarily to meet deadlines or due to frustration, intending to fix them later but forgetting. This leaves critical functionalities untested.
  • Potential Impact: High impact because disabling tests removes the security checks for the affected code areas, potentially reintroducing or masking vulnerabilities that were previously detected and mitigated.