Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
69 lines (50 loc) · 9.95 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

69 lines (50 loc) · 9.95 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for catchorg/catch2

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limiting for Catch2 Test Processes

Description:

  1. Identify Catch2 features leading to resource intensity: Recognize that Catch2 features like GENERATORs, parameterized tests (TEST_CASE_TEMPLATE, TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE), and extensive use of SECTION blocks can lead to a large number of test case executions and increased resource consumption.
  2. Implement process-level resource limits: Utilize operating system or containerization features to limit CPU time, memory, and potentially disk I/O available to the process running the Catch2 test executable. This prevents runaway tests, especially those using Catch2's powerful features to generate many test instances, from consuming excessive resources.
  3. Configure limits based on Catch2 test suite complexity: Adjust resource limits based on the expected resource usage of your Catch2 test suite, considering the number of test cases, data generation, and complexity of assertions.
  4. Integrate resource limits into Catch2 test execution scripts: Ensure resource limits are applied whenever Catch2 tests are run, whether in CI/CD or local development, by incorporating them into your test execution scripts or build system commands that invoke the Catch2 test runner.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) in Testing Environment due to Catch2 Test Suite (High Severity): Poorly designed Catch2 tests, especially those leveraging generators or parameterized tests without proper bounds, can unintentionally create an overwhelming number of test instances, leading to resource exhaustion and a DoS within the testing environment.
  • Resource Exhaustion on Test Servers by Catch2 Processes (Medium Severity): In shared testing environments, a Catch2 test suite with unbounded test generation can consume excessive resources, impacting other tests or processes running on the same server.

Impact:

  • DoS in Testing Environment due to Catch2 Test Suite: High Risk Reduction - Resource limiting directly prevents Catch2 test processes from monopolizing resources, significantly reducing the risk of DoS caused by runaway Catch2 tests.
  • Resource Exhaustion on Test Servers by Catch2 Processes: Medium Risk Reduction - Limits the impact of resource-intensive Catch2 tests on shared resources, although overall server capacity still needs to be managed for concurrent test executions.

Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Resource limiting might be partially implemented in CI/CD pipelines that execute Catch2 tests within containers. However, it might be missing for local development or less formalized testing environments.

Missing Implementation:

  • Local Catch2 test execution environments: Developers might not be using resource limits when running Catch2 tests locally, especially when experimenting with generators or parameterized tests, potentially leading to local resource issues.
  • Granular resource limits for specific Catch2 test groups: Currently, limits are likely applied at the process level, but not at the level of specific Catch2 test cases or sections, which could offer more fine-grained control for complex test suites.

Mitigation Strategy: Review and Bound Logic in Catch2 Test Cases using Generators and Sections

Description:

  1. Focus code reviews on Catch2 specific logic: When reviewing test code, pay special attention to Catch2 features that introduce complexity and potential for unbounded execution, such as SECTION blocks, GENERATORs, and parameterized tests.
  2. Analyze Catch2 SECTION nesting and loops: Examine the nesting depth of SECTION blocks and loops within Catch2 test cases. Ensure that SECTION blocks are not excessively nested, leading to combinatorial explosion of test paths. Verify loops within tests, especially those combined with SECTIONs or generators, have clear exit conditions and are bounded to prevent infinite loops.
  3. Bound Catch2 GENERATOR ranges and parameterized test sets: Carefully define the ranges and data sets used with Catch2 GENERATORs and parameterized tests (TEST_CASE_TEMPLATE, TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE). Ensure these ranges are intentionally limited and do not inadvertently create an excessively large number of test instances. Use filtering or sampling techniques if necessary to manage the size of generated test data.
  4. Implement explicit bounds within Catch2 test code: Where complex test logic using Catch2 features is necessary, add explicit bounds or safeguards directly within the test code. For example, limit the number of iterations in loops used with SECTIONs or generators, or add checks to prevent excessive recursion within test logic.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) in Testing Environment due to Unbounded Catch2 Tests (High Severity): Unbounded loops or excessive test generation within Catch2 test cases, particularly when using SECTIONs and GENERATORs without proper limits, can lead to prolonged test execution and resource exhaustion, causing a DoS.
  • Increased Catch2 Test Execution Time (Medium Severity): Even if not a full DoS, unbounded or excessive test logic within Catch2 tests can significantly increase test execution time, slowing down the development feedback loop.

Impact:

  • DoS in Testing Environment due to Unbounded Catch2 Tests: High Risk Reduction - By preventing unbounded test logic within Catch2 tests, this strategy directly mitigates the risk of resource exhaustion and DoS caused by runaway Catch2 test suites.
  • Increased Catch2 Test Execution Time: High Risk Reduction - Ensuring bounded test logic in Catch2 tests directly reduces the likelihood of excessively long test execution times, improving developer productivity.

Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Code review processes might exist, but specific focus on Catch2 features like SECTIONs and GENERATORs and their potential for unbounded logic might be lacking.

Missing Implementation:

  • Specific code review guidelines for Catch2 features: Explicit guidelines for reviewers to specifically check for unbounded logic related to Catch2 SECTIONs, GENERATORs, and parameterized tests might be missing.
  • Static analysis tools aware of Catch2 patterns: Static analysis tools that can understand Catch2 constructs and detect potential unbounded loops or excessive test generation within Catch2 test code could be beneficial but are likely not widely used.

Mitigation Strategy: Controlled Updates and Version Pinning of Catch2 Dependency

Description:

  1. Pin a specific Catch2 version in project build files: In your project's dependency management (e.g., CMake find_package, Conan, vcpkg, or manual inclusion), explicitly specify a fixed, stable version of Catch2. Avoid using version ranges or "latest" tags that could lead to automatic, uncontrolled updates.
  2. Establish a process for Catch2 version updates: Before updating to a newer Catch2 version, follow a controlled process:
    • Review Catch2 release notes: Carefully examine the release notes and changelogs for the new Catch2 version, specifically looking for bug fixes, security-related changes, and any modifications that might affect test behavior or introduce regressions.
    • Test new Catch2 version in a staging environment: Before updating in the main project, test the new Catch2 version in a dedicated staging or development environment by running your complete Catch2 test suite. Identify and address any compatibility issues, test failures, or unexpected behavior changes.
    • Phased rollout of Catch2 update: After successful staging testing, update Catch2 in your main project and monitor test results closely in CI/CD and development environments after the update to ensure stability and catch any unforeseen issues.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Introduction of Bugs or Regressions from Unvetted Catch2 Updates (Medium Severity): While Catch2 is generally stable, new versions could potentially introduce bugs, regressions, or subtle changes in behavior that might affect your test suite's reliability or introduce false positives/negatives. Uncontrolled updates increase the risk of encountering these issues without prior testing.
  • Unexpected Changes in Catch2 Test Execution Behavior (Medium Severity): Updates to Catch2 might alter the way tests are executed, reported, or behave in edge cases, potentially leading to inconsistencies or requiring adjustments to your test suite or build process if updates are applied without proper testing.

Impact:

  • Introduction of Bugs or Regressions from Unvetted Catch2 Updates: Medium Risk Reduction - Controlled updates and testing reduce the risk of introducing issues from new Catch2 versions by allowing for pre-update validation, but cannot completely eliminate the possibility of undiscovered problems.
  • Unexpected Changes in Catch2 Test Execution Behavior: High Risk Reduction - Thorough testing of new Catch2 versions before widespread adoption significantly reduces the risk of unexpected behavior changes impacting test reliability and development workflows.

Currently Implemented: Likely Implemented. Version pinning is a standard practice in software dependency management and is generally applied to Catch2 dependencies in build systems.

Missing Implementation:

  • Formal documented process for Catch2 updates: A documented procedure outlining the steps for reviewing, testing, and rolling out Catch2 version updates might be absent, leading to inconsistent update practices across projects or teams.
  • Automated regression testing for Catch2 updates: Automated test suites specifically designed to detect regressions or compatibility issues when updating Catch2, beyond the standard application test suite, could be beneficial but are likely not commonly implemented.