Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
244 lines (192 loc) · 18.8 KB

File metadata and controls

244 lines (192 loc) · 18.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dragonflydb/dragonfly

Objective: Compromise application using DragonflyDB by exploiting DragonflyDB vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via DragonflyDB Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE - Root Goal: System Compromise] ├───[1.0] Exploit DragonflyDB Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH - Code/Memory Exploitation] [CRITICAL NODE - Vulnerability Exploitation] │ ├───[1.1] Code Execution Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH - Code Execution] [CRITICAL NODE - Code Execution] │ │ ├───[1.1.1] Buffer Overflow in Command Parsing [HIGH RISK PATH - Buffer Overflow] [CRITICAL NODE - Buffer Overflow] │ │ │ └───[1.1.1.1] Send crafted command exceeding buffer limits [HIGH RISK PATH - Buffer Overflow] │ │ └───[1.1.4] Use-After-Free or Double-Free Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Corruption] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Corruption] │ │ └───[1.1.4.1] Trigger memory corruption through specific command sequences [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Corruption] │ ├───[1.2] Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities (beyond code execution) [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Corruption] │ │ └───[1.2.2] Denial of Service via Memory Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Exhaustion DoS] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Exhaustion DoS] │ │ └───[1.2.2.1] Send commands leading to excessive memory allocation [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Exhaustion DoS] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Exhaustion DoS] ├───[2.0] Exploit DragonflyDB Misconfiguration [HIGH RISK PATH - Misconfiguration Exploitation] [CRITICAL NODE - Misconfiguration] │ ├───[2.1] Weak or Default Configuration [HIGH RISK PATH - Weak Configuration] │ │ └───[2.1.2] Insecure Default Network Bindings [HIGH RISK PATH - Insecure Network Binding] [CRITICAL NODE - Insecure Network Binding] │ │ └───[2.1.2.1] Directly connect to DragonflyDB instance from outside the intended network [HIGH RISK PATH - Insecure Network Binding] [CRITICAL NODE - Insecure Network Binding] │ ├───[2.2] Insufficient Resource Limits [HIGH RISK PATH - Resource Limit Exploitation] │ │ └───[2.2.1] Memory Exhaustion due to Lack of Limits [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Exhaustion DoS] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Limit Misconfiguration] │ │ └───[2.2.1.1] Send commands causing excessive memory usage leading to DoS [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Exhaustion DoS] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Limit Misconfiguration] ├───[3.0] Exploit DragonflyDB Dependencies [HIGH RISK PATH - Dependency Exploitation] [CRITICAL NODE - Dependency Vulnerabilities] │ └───[3.1] Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Libraries [HIGH RISK PATH - Dependency Vulnerabilities] [CRITICAL NODE - Dependency Vulnerabilities] │ └───[3.1.1] Outdated Dependencies with Known Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH - Outdated Dependencies] [CRITICAL NODE - Outdated Dependencies] │ └───[3.1.1.1] Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in DragonflyDB's dependencies [HIGH RISK PATH - Outdated Dependencies] [CRITICAL NODE - Outdated Dependencies] └───[4.0] Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks against DragonflyDB [HIGH RISK PATH - DoS Attacks] [CRITICAL NODE - DoS Attacks] └───[4.1] Resource Exhaustion Attacks [HIGH RISK PATH - Resource Exhaustion DoS] └───[4.1.1] Memory Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Exhaustion DoS] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Exhaustion DoS] └───[4.1.1.1] Send commands that consume excessive memory [HIGH RISK PATH - Memory Exhaustion DoS] [CRITICAL NODE - Memory Exhaustion DoS]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities within DragonflyDB's code to gain unauthorized access or cause harm.
    • Focuses on technical flaws in DragonflyDB's implementation.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Rigorous code review and security audits of DragonflyDB codebase.
    • Fuzz testing and penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities.
    • Adopting secure coding practices and memory-safe programming techniques.
    • Promptly patching any identified vulnerabilities in DragonflyDB.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities that allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server running DragonflyDB.
    • This is the most severe type of vulnerability, leading to full system compromise.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Prioritize elimination of code execution vulnerabilities.
    • Focus on buffer overflow protection, memory safety, and input validation.
    • Employ static and dynamic analysis tools to detect potential code execution flaws.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Sending specially crafted commands to DragonflyDB that exceed buffer boundaries during parsing.
    • Overwriting memory regions, potentially hijacking program execution flow.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Implement robust input validation and bounds checking in command parsing routines.
    • Use memory-safe functions and libraries to prevent buffer overflows.
    • Fuzz test command parsing logic with long and malformed inputs.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The specific action of sending an oversized command to trigger a buffer overflow.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 1.1.1 - focus on secure command parsing implementation.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting memory management errors where memory is accessed after being freed or freed multiple times.
    • Leads to memory corruption, potentially code execution or denial of service.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Employ memory-safe programming languages or techniques.
    • Thoroughly test memory management logic, especially in concurrent operations.
    • Use memory sanitizers (e.g., AddressSanitizer, Valgrind) during development and testing.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Crafting specific sequences of commands to trigger use-after-free or double-free conditions.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 1.1.4 - focus on robust memory management and testing of command sequences.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Memory safety issues that corrupt data in memory but may not directly lead to code execution.
    • Can still cause data integrity issues, application malfunction, or denial of service.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Focus on general memory safety practices.
    • Implement data integrity checks and validation mechanisms within the application.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting memory leaks or inefficient memory management to cause DragonflyDB to run out of memory and crash.
    • Sending commands that consume excessive memory resources.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Implement robust memory management and resource limits within DragonflyDB.
    • Configure memory limits for DragonflyDB deployments.
    • Monitor memory usage and set up alerts for high memory consumption.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The specific action of sending commands designed to consume excessive memory.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 1.2.2 - focus on memory limits and monitoring.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from improper configuration of DragonflyDB.
    • Often easier to exploit than code vulnerabilities, as they rely on operational mistakes.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Develop and enforce secure configuration guidelines for DragonflyDB deployments.
    • Automate configuration management to ensure consistent and secure settings.
    • Regularly audit DragonflyDB configurations for security weaknesses.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting insecure default settings or weak configurations that are not changed after deployment.
    • Common misconfigurations include default credentials, insecure network bindings, and disabled security features.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Change default credentials immediately upon deployment.
    • Disable or secure management interfaces if not needed.
    • Review and harden default configurations before production deployment.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • DragonflyDB instance is exposed to the public internet or untrusted networks due to insecure default network bindings.
    • Allows direct access from unauthorized sources.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Ensure DragonflyDB is bound to a private network interface, not directly exposed to the internet.
    • Implement firewalls to restrict network access to DragonflyDB to only authorized sources.
    • Use network segmentation to isolate DragonflyDB in a secure network zone.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The specific action of directly connecting to an exposed DragonflyDB instance from an external, untrusted network.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 2.1.2 - focus on secure network bindings and firewalling.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Lack of proper resource limits (memory, CPU, connections) allows attackers to exhaust server resources and cause denial of service.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Configure resource limits for DragonflyDB (memory limits are particularly critical).
    • Implement rate limiting to prevent excessive command requests.
    • Monitor resource usage and set alerts for exceeding thresholds.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Specifically, the lack of memory limits that enables memory exhaustion DoS attacks.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 2.2 - focus on configuring and enforcing memory limits.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The specific action of sending commands to exploit the lack of memory limits and cause memory exhaustion.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 2.2 and 2.2.1 - focus on memory limits and preventing excessive memory consumption.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in third-party libraries that DragonflyDB depends on.
    • Indirectly compromising DragonflyDB through its dependencies.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Maintain a comprehensive inventory of DragonflyDB's dependencies.
    • Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Update dependencies promptly to the latest secure versions.
    • Implement dependency verification mechanisms to prevent supply chain attacks.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • General category of vulnerabilities residing in DragonflyDB's dependencies.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 3.0 - focus on dependency management and vulnerability scanning.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Using outdated versions of dependencies that have known and publicly disclosed vulnerabilities.
    • Attackers can easily exploit these known vulnerabilities.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Keep dependencies up-to-date.
    • Automate dependency updates and vulnerability scanning.
    • Establish a process for promptly addressing reported dependency vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The specific action of identifying and exploiting known vulnerabilities in outdated dependencies.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 3.1.1 - focus on keeping dependencies updated and vulnerability scanning.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Attacks aimed at making DragonflyDB unavailable to legitimate users.
    • Can be achieved through resource exhaustion, network flooding, or algorithmic complexity exploitation.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Implement DoS mitigation strategies at multiple levels (application, network, infrastructure).
    • Resource limits, rate limiting, connection limits, and network-level DDoS protection.
    • Monitoring and alerting for DoS attack indicators.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • DoS attacks that aim to exhaust DragonflyDB's resources (memory, CPU, disk I/O, connections).
    • Overwhelming the server with requests to consume resources.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Implement resource limits and quotas.
    • Rate limiting and connection limits.
    • Load balancing and scaling to handle traffic spikes.
    • Monitoring resource usage and setting alerts.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Specifically targeting memory resources to cause DoS.
    • Sending commands that consume excessive memory.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 4.1 and 1.2.2 - focus on memory limits, monitoring, and preventing excessive memory consumption.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • The specific action of sending memory-intensive commands to trigger memory exhaustion DoS.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Same as 4.1.1 - focus on preventing memory exhaustion through resource management.