Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
122 lines (91 loc) · 9.13 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

122 lines (91 loc) · 9.13 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dragonflydb/dragonfly

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Snapshotting and Persistence Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Configure Snapshot Interval: Use the --snapshot_interval <seconds> flag when starting Dragonfly. Choose a value based on your data change rate and acceptable data loss. For example, --snapshot_interval 60 would create a snapshot every 60 seconds. Start with a shorter interval (e.g., 60 seconds) and monitor performance. Increase it if I/O overhead is too high, but be aware of the increased data loss risk.
    2. Secure Snapshot Directory: Use the --dir <path> flag to specify a dedicated directory for snapshots. Ensure this directory is only accessible by the user running Dragonfly (e.g., chown dragonfly:dragonfly /path/to/snapshots). Use chmod 700 /path/to/snapshots to restrict access. This is crucial for preventing unauthorized access to snapshot files.
    3. Consider AOF (if needed): If data loss is unacceptable, enable AOF with --aof_enabled=true. Also, configure --aof_rewrite_incremental_fsync and --aof_fsync for balancing performance and durability. Monitor the AOF file size and implement a compaction strategy (manual or automated).
    4. Snapshot Encryption (if sensitive data): If snapshots contain sensitive data, encrypt them before writing to disk. This is a crucial step if sensitive data is stored. This would likely involve a custom script integrated with Dragonfly's snapshotting process, as it's not a built-in feature.
    5. Monitor Snapshotting: Implement monitoring (e.g., using Prometheus, Grafana, or custom scripts) to track snapshot success/failure, duration, and file size. Set up alerts for any errors or significant delays. While the monitoring itself might be external, the data being monitored is directly from Dragonfly.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Loss (High Severity): Improper snapshot configuration can lead to significant data loss.
    • Data Breach (High Severity): Unsecured snapshot files can expose sensitive data.
    • Data Corruption (Medium Severity): Issues during snapshot creation or restoration.

  • Impact:

    • Data Loss: Risk significantly reduced by proper snapshot interval, and monitoring. AOF further minimizes data loss.
    • Data Breach: Risk significantly reduced by securing the snapshot directory and encrypting snapshot files.
    • Data Corruption: Risk reduced by monitoring and proper snapshot management.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Snapshot interval configured (--snapshot_interval 300).
    • Dedicated snapshot directory with restricted permissions (/var/lib/dragonfly/snapshots, owned by dragonfly user).
    • Basic monitoring of snapshot success/failure via system logs.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Snapshot encryption is not implemented.
    • AOF mode is not enabled.
    • Advanced monitoring with alerting (e.g., Prometheus integration) is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Network Exposure and Implement Access Control (Dragonfly-Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Bind to Specific Interface: Use the --bind <ip_address> flag when starting Dragonfly. Never use 0.0.0.0 in production. For local-only access, use --bind 127.0.0.1. For access from a specific private network, use the appropriate private IP address (e.g., --bind 192.168.1.10). This is the primary Dragonfly-specific control for network access.
    2. Disable Dangerous Commands: Use the --protected-commands "FLUSHALL,FLUSHDB,CONFIG,DEBUG,SHUTDOWN" flag to disable commands that could be abused. Customize this list based on your application's needs. This directly controls which commands Dragonfly will accept.
    3. Implement Authentication (when available): When Dragonfly supports authentication, enable it using the appropriate configuration flags (these flags are hypothetical, as Dragonfly doesn't currently support authentication). Use strong, unique passwords.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Exposing Dragonfly to untrusted networks.
    • Data Breach (High Severity): Unauthorized access can lead to data exfiltration.
    • Command Injection (High Severity): Attackers could execute arbitrary commands if combined with application vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access: Risk dramatically reduced by binding to a specific interface.
    • Data Breach: Risk significantly reduced by preventing unauthorized access.
    • Command Injection: Risk partially mitigated by disabling dangerous commands.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Dragonfly is bound to the local interface (--bind 127.0.0.1).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Dangerous commands are not explicitly disabled.
    • Authentication is not implemented (pending Dragonfly support).

Mitigation Strategy: Prevent Resource Exhaustion (DoS/DDoS) - Dragonfly Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Set Memory Limit: Use the --maxmemory <bytes> flag to set a maximum memory limit for Dragonfly. For example, --maxmemory 1gb limits Dragonfly to 1GB of RAM.
    2. Configure Eviction Policy: Use the --maxmemory-policy <policy> flag to define how Dragonfly handles reaching the memory limit. Common policies: allkeys-lru, volatile-lru, noeviction.
    3. Limit Concurrent Connections: Use the --maxclients <number> flag to limit the maximum number of simultaneous client connections. For example, --maxclients 1000.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Attackers can flood the server, consuming memory or CPU.
    • System Instability (Medium Severity): Excessive memory usage can lead to crashes.

  • Impact:

    • DoS: Risk significantly reduced by setting memory limits and connection limits.
    • System Instability: Risk reduced by setting memory limits.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Memory limit is set (--maxmemory 512mb).
    • Eviction policy is set to allkeys-lru (--maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Connection limits are not explicitly set.

Mitigation Strategy: Dragonfly-Specific Monitoring and Logging

  • Description:

    1. Enable Logging: Use --loglevel verbose (for development/debugging) or --loglevel notice (for production) to enable detailed logging. This controls Dragonfly's internal logging.
    2. Slow Query Logging: Use --slowlog-log-slower-than <microseconds> to log queries that exceed a specified execution time. This is a built-in Dragonfly feature. For example, --slowlog-log-slower-than 10000.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Undetected Attacks (High Severity): Without logs, attacks may go unnoticed.
    • Difficult Incident Response (High Severity): Lack of logs hinders investigation.
    • Performance Issues (Medium Severity): Slow queries can impact performance.

  • Impact:

    • Undetected Attacks: Risk reduced by providing visibility.
    • Difficult Incident Response: Improved incident response.
    • Performance Issues: Helps identify performance problems.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic logging is enabled (--loglevel notice).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Slow query logging is not configured.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Cluster Mode (If Applicable) - Dragonfly Configuration

  • Description: (Assuming Dragonfly has a cluster mode)

    1. Enable TLS for Inter-Node Communication: If Dragonfly supports TLS for communication between cluster nodes, enable it using the appropriate configuration flags (these are hypothetical, depending on Dragonfly's implementation).
    2. Authentication for Cluster Management: If Dragonfly provides authentication for cluster management, enable it using the appropriate configuration flags.
    3. Authorization for Cluster Management: If Dragonfly provides authorization, use it.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): Interception of communication between nodes.
    • Unauthorized Cluster Modification (High Severity): Malicious nodes joining the cluster.
    • Data Breach (High Severity): Eavesdropping on inter-node communication.

  • Impact:

    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Risk eliminated by using TLS.
    • Unauthorized Cluster Modification: Risk significantly reduced by authentication and authorization.
    • Data Breach: Risk reduced by encrypting communication.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not applicable (not using Dragonfly in a clustered configuration).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • All aspects of cluster mode security are missing.