Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
322 lines (278 loc) · 26.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

322 lines (278 loc) · 26.2 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Envoy Proxy Design

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to perform a thorough security assessment of the Envoy Proxy design, focusing on its key components and their interactions. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Envoy's architecture and common deployment scenarios (primarily sidecar in Kubernetes, as per the design document). The analysis will cover:

  • Listener: How incoming connections are handled, TLS termination, and initial filtering.
  • Network Filter Chain: Security implications of various network-level filters.
  • HTTP Connection Manager (HCM): HTTP-specific processing and vulnerabilities.
  • Router: Route configuration and access control based on routes.
  • Cluster Manager: Upstream connection management, health checks, and TLS.
  • TLS Inspector: Security of TLS inspection and potential bypasses.
  • Access Logger: Data security and privacy concerns related to logging.
  • Build Process: Security of the build pipeline and artifact generation.
  • Deployment (Kubernetes Sidecar): Security considerations specific to the Kubernetes sidecar deployment model.

Scope:

This analysis focuses on the security aspects of the Envoy Proxy itself, as described in the provided design document and inferred from its codebase and documentation (https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy). It considers Envoy's role as a service mesh component, edge proxy, and internal service proxy. The analysis does not cover the security of the backend services Envoy proxies, except where Envoy's configuration or behavior directly impacts their security. It also assumes a Kubernetes sidecar deployment as the primary context, but will highlight differences for other deployment models where relevant.

Methodology:

  1. Component Breakdown: Each key component of Envoy (as listed above) will be analyzed individually.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each component, we will identify potential threats based on its function, inputs, and outputs. We will use the STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) model as a guide.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: We will assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat, considering existing security controls.
  4. Mitigation Strategies: For each significant vulnerability, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies that can be implemented within Envoy's configuration or through operational practices. These will be tailored to Envoy and the Kubernetes sidecar deployment model.
  5. Data Flow Analysis: We will trace the flow of data through Envoy, highlighting potential points of vulnerability.
  6. Codebase and Documentation Review: We will leverage information from the Envoy codebase and official documentation to support our analysis and recommendations.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

This section breaks down the security implications of each key component, following the methodology outlined above.

2.1 Listener

  • Function: Accepts incoming connections, performs TLS termination (if configured), and initiates the filter chain.
  • Threats:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): An attacker could flood the listener with connection attempts, exhausting resources.
    • TLS Downgrade Attacks: An attacker could attempt to force the use of weaker TLS versions or cipher suites.
    • Certificate Spoofing: An attacker could present a forged certificate to gain unauthorized access.
    • Information Disclosure: Improperly configured TLS settings could leak information about the server.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Slowloris or other slow-request attacks could tie up listener resources.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Misconfiguration of TLS parameters (e.g., allowing weak ciphers).
    • Vulnerabilities in the TLS library used by Envoy.
    • Insufficient resource limits on the listener.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • DoS Protection:
      • Configure connection_limit on the listener to restrict the number of concurrent connections.
      • Use Envoy's rate_limit filter (or an external rate limiting service) to throttle connection attempts from individual IPs or networks. Specifically, configure a global rate limit on the listener itself, in addition to any per-route or per-service rate limits.
      • Deploy Envoy behind a load balancer or firewall that can provide additional DoS protection.
    • TLS Hardening:
      • Explicitly configure tls_context to use only strong TLS versions (TLS 1.3, with TLS 1.2 as a fallback only if absolutely necessary) and cipher suites (e.g., those recommended by Mozilla's server-side TLS guidelines). Do not rely on defaults.
      • Enable require_client_certificate for mutual TLS (mTLS) where appropriate, ensuring strong client authentication.
      • Configure verify_certificate_spki, verify_certificate_hash, or verify_subject_alt_name to pin certificates and prevent spoofing. This is crucial for mTLS.
      • Use a robust certificate management system (e.g., cert-manager in Kubernetes) to automate certificate issuance, renewal, and revocation.
      • Disable TLS session resumption tickets if not strictly required, or ensure they are securely implemented to prevent replay attacks.
    • Resource Limits:
      • Set appropriate resource limits (CPU, memory) on the Envoy container in Kubernetes to prevent resource exhaustion.
      • Configure overload_manager to shed traffic gracefully under high load.
    • Vulnerability Management:
      • Regularly update Envoy to the latest version to patch any vulnerabilities in the TLS library or other components.
      • Monitor Envoy's security advisories and the CVE database for relevant vulnerabilities.

2.2 Network Filter Chain

  • Function: A chain of filters that process requests at the network level. Examples include tcp_proxy, http_connection_manager, rate_limit, ext_authz.
  • Threats:
    • Filter Bypass: An attacker could craft a request that bypasses a security filter.
    • Vulnerabilities in Filters: A specific filter could have a vulnerability that allows an attacker to compromise Envoy.
    • Misconfiguration: Incorrect filter configuration could lead to security weaknesses.
    • Denial of Service: A malicious filter or a filter misconfiguration could cause Envoy to crash or become unresponsive.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Logic errors in filter code.
    • Buffer overflows or other memory safety issues in filters.
    • Incorrect handling of edge cases or malformed input.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Filter Ordering: Carefully consider the order of filters in the chain. Security-critical filters (e.g., ext_authz, rate_limit) should generally be placed before filters that perform more complex processing (e.g., http_connection_manager).
    • Filter Auditing: Thoroughly review the configuration and code of each filter used, paying particular attention to custom-developed filters.
    • Input Validation: Ensure that each filter performs appropriate input validation on the data it processes.
    • Sandboxing: Use Envoy's WebAssembly (Wasm) support to run untrusted filters in a sandboxed environment. This is particularly important for custom filters or filters from third-party sources.
    • Vulnerability Management: Regularly update Envoy and any third-party filter extensions to the latest versions.
    • Testing: Use fuzzing and penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities in filters. Envoy's integration with OSS-Fuzz is crucial here.
    • Least Privilege: Grant filters only the necessary permissions. For example, a filter that only needs to read headers should not have write access to the request body.

2.3 HTTP Connection Manager (HCM)

  • Function: Handles HTTP-specific processing, including header parsing, routing, and request/response transformations.
  • Threats:
    • HTTP Request Smuggling: An attacker could exploit discrepancies in how Envoy and the backend server interpret HTTP requests to bypass security controls or access unauthorized resources.
    • Header Manipulation: An attacker could inject malicious headers to exploit vulnerabilities in the backend application or Envoy itself.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If Envoy is used to serve user-generated content, an attacker could inject malicious scripts.
    • SQL Injection: If Envoy passes user input to a backend database, an attacker could inject malicious SQL code.
    • Path Traversal: An attacker could use ../ sequences in the URL to access files outside the intended directory.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Bugs in the HTTP parser.
    • Incorrect handling of malformed headers.
    • Insufficient sanitization of user input.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Request Smuggling Protection:
      • Use the normalize_path option in the HCM to normalize URLs and prevent path traversal attacks.
      • Enable merge_slashes to prevent certain types of request smuggling attacks.
      • Configure path_with_escaped_slashes_action appropriately. Reject ambiguous requests.
      • Ensure that Envoy and the backend server use the same HTTP parsing rules. This is often best achieved by using the same HTTP server library on both sides.
    • Header Sanitization:
      • Use the request_headers_to_remove and response_headers_to_remove options to remove potentially dangerous headers.
      • Use the request_headers_to_add and response_headers_to_add options to add security headers (e.g., Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
      • Carefully review and restrict the headers that are forwarded to the backend application.
    • Input Validation:
      • Use Envoy's ext_authz filter to perform input validation before forwarding requests to the backend. This allows you to centralize input validation logic.
      • Validate all user input, including headers, query parameters, and request bodies.
      • Use a whitelist approach to input validation, allowing only known-good characters and patterns.
    • XSS Protection:
      • If Envoy is used to serve user-generated content, use a robust HTML sanitization library to prevent XSS attacks. This is typically best handled by the backend application, but Envoy can provide an additional layer of defense.
    • Path Traversal Protection:
      • Use normalize_path: true in route configuration.
    • Vulnerability Management:
      • Regularly update Envoy to the latest version to patch any vulnerabilities in the HCM.

2.4 Router

  • Function: Matches incoming requests to routes and selects an upstream cluster.
  • Threats:
    • Route Hijacking: An attacker could manipulate the route configuration to redirect traffic to a malicious upstream.
    • Unauthorized Access: Misconfigured routes could allow unauthorized access to backend services.
    • Information Disclosure: Route configuration could reveal information about the backend infrastructure.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Incorrectly configured route matching rules.
    • Lack of access control on routes.
    • Vulnerabilities in the route configuration parsing logic.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Route Matching: Use precise route matching rules to avoid unintended matches. Use prefix, path, and regex matching carefully, and prefer more specific matches over broader ones.
    • Access Control:
      • Use Envoy's RBAC filter to enforce access control on routes. Define roles and permissions, and associate them with specific routes.
      • Integrate with an external authorization service (ext_authz) for more complex authorization logic.
      • Use mTLS to authenticate clients and restrict access to specific routes based on client identity.
    • Route Configuration Validation:
      • Use a schema validation tool to validate the Envoy configuration file.
      • Implement a robust change management process for route configuration changes.
      • Use Envoy's admin interface to validate the loaded configuration.
    • Least Privilege: Grant routes only the necessary permissions to access upstream clusters.

2.5 Cluster Manager

  • Function: Manages connections to upstream hosts, including load balancing, health checking, and circuit breaking.
  • Threats:
    • Upstream Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate an upstream host to intercept or modify traffic.
    • Denial of Service: An attacker could target upstream hosts to disrupt service.
    • Information Disclosure: Health check endpoints could leak information about upstream hosts.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Misconfiguration of upstream TLS settings.
    • Vulnerabilities in the load balancing or health checking logic.
    • Insufficient protection against upstream failures.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Upstream TLS:
      • Always use TLS to connect to upstream hosts. Configure tls_context for each upstream cluster.
      • Use mTLS to authenticate both Envoy and the upstream hosts.
      • Validate the upstream host's certificate using verify_certificate_spki, verify_certificate_hash, or verify_subject_alt_name.
    • Health Checks:
      • Use active health checks to proactively monitor the health of upstream hosts.
      • Configure health check timeouts and intervals appropriately.
      • Secure health check endpoints to prevent unauthorized access. Use authentication and authorization if the health check endpoint reveals sensitive information.
    • Circuit Breaking:
      • Configure circuit breakers to limit the impact of upstream failures.
      • Set appropriate thresholds for connection errors, timeouts, and retries.
    • Outlier Detection: Use outlier detection to identify and remove unhealthy hosts from the load balancing pool.
    • Load Balancing Algorithm: Choose a load balancing algorithm that is appropriate for the application and traffic patterns. Consider using weighted round-robin or least requests for better distribution.

2.6 TLS Inspector

  • Function: Inspects TLS connections to extract information like SNI (Server Name Indication).
  • Threats:
    • TLS Bypass: An attacker could use techniques like SNI spoofing or TLS tunneling to bypass the TLS Inspector.
    • Information Disclosure: The TLS Inspector could leak information about the client or server.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Bugs in the TLS parsing logic.
    • Incorrect handling of edge cases.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • SNI Validation: Validate the SNI value against a whitelist of allowed domains.
    • TLS Tunneling Detection: Implement mechanisms to detect and block TLS tunneling. This is a complex problem, and may require advanced techniques like deep packet inspection.
    • Vulnerability Management: Regularly update Envoy to the latest version to patch any vulnerabilities in the TLS Inspector.
    • Careful Configuration: Ensure the TLS Inspector is configured correctly and only extracts the necessary information.

2.7 Access Logger

  • Function: Logs information about incoming requests.
  • Threats:
    • Information Disclosure: Logs could contain sensitive data, such as PII, authentication credentials, or API keys.
    • Log Injection: An attacker could inject malicious data into the logs to exploit vulnerabilities in log analysis tools.
    • Repudiation: Insufficient logging could make it difficult to track down security incidents.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Incorrect configuration of the access logger.
    • Lack of log rotation or retention policies.
    • Insecure storage of logs.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Data Minimization: Carefully configure the access logger to log only the necessary information. Avoid logging sensitive data whenever possible. Use the filter configuration to exclude specific fields.
    • Data Masking/Redaction: Use Envoy's custom_format or a custom filter to mask or redact sensitive data in the logs.
    • Log Rotation and Retention: Implement log rotation and retention policies to prevent logs from growing indefinitely and to comply with data retention requirements.
    • Secure Log Storage: Store logs securely, using encryption and access control. In Kubernetes, use a dedicated logging solution (e.g., Fluentd, Elasticsearch, Kibana) with appropriate security configurations.
    • Log Integrity: Use a mechanism to ensure the integrity of the logs, such as checksumming or digital signatures.
    • Log Injection Prevention: Sanitize log data to prevent log injection attacks.

2.8 Build Process

  • Function: Compiles Envoy from source code and produces binary artifacts.
  • Threats:
    • Supply Chain Attacks: An attacker could compromise the build system or a dependency to inject malicious code into Envoy.
    • Build Artifact Tampering: An attacker could modify the build artifacts after they are created.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Vulnerabilities in the build tools (e.g., Bazel).
    • Compromised dependencies.
    • Weaknesses in the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Management:
      • Use a software bill of materials (SBOM) to track all dependencies.
      • Use dependency pinning to ensure that only specific versions of dependencies are used.
      • Regularly scan dependencies for vulnerabilities using a tool like Dependabot or Snyk.
    • Build System Security:
      • Secure the build system (e.g., GitHub Actions, CircleCI) using strong authentication and authorization.
      • Use signed commits and tags in the Git repository.
      • Use a secure artifact repository (e.g., a private Docker registry with authentication and authorization).
    • Code Signing: Digitally sign the Envoy binary artifacts to ensure their integrity.
    • Reproducible Builds: Strive for reproducible builds, so that anyone can independently verify that the build artifacts were produced from the source code.
    • SAST/DAST/IAST: Integrate static, dynamic, and interactive application security testing into the build pipeline.

2.9 Deployment (Kubernetes Sidecar)

  • Function: Envoy runs as a sidecar container alongside the application container in a Kubernetes pod.
  • Threats:
    • Container Escape: An attacker could exploit a vulnerability in Envoy or the application container to escape to the host node.
    • Network Policy Bypass: An attacker could bypass Kubernetes network policies to access other pods or services.
    • Privilege Escalation: An attacker could gain elevated privileges within the pod or on the host node.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Misconfigured Kubernetes security contexts.
    • Vulnerabilities in the container runtime (e.g., Docker, containerd).
    • Weaknesses in Kubernetes RBAC policies.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Security Contexts:
      • Run Envoy as a non-root user. Use the runAsUser and runAsGroup fields in the pod's security context.
      • Set allowPrivilegeEscalation: false to prevent privilege escalation.
      • Use a read-only root filesystem (readOnlyRootFilesystem: true).
      • Drop unnecessary capabilities using capabilities.drop.
    • Network Policies:
      • Implement strict Kubernetes network policies to control traffic flow between pods. Only allow necessary communication between Envoy and the application container, and between Envoy and other services.
    • Pod Security Policies (or Pod Security Admission):
      • Use Pod Security Policies (deprecated in Kubernetes 1.25) or Pod Security Admission to enforce security best practices for pods.
    • Kubernetes RBAC:
      • Use Kubernetes RBAC to restrict access to the Kubernetes API and other resources. Grant Envoy only the necessary permissions.
    • Image Scanning: Scan container images for vulnerabilities before deploying them.
    • Runtime Security: Use a runtime security tool (e.g., Falco, Sysdig) to detect and respond to suspicious activity within the pod.
    • Node Security: Secure the Kubernetes nodes themselves, following best practices for operating system hardening and security patching.

3. Data Flow Analysis

Data flows through Envoy in the following general pattern:

  1. Client Request: A client initiates a connection to Envoy (Listener).
  2. TLS Handshake (if configured): Envoy performs a TLS handshake with the client (Listener, TLS Inspector).
  3. Network Filter Chain Processing: The request passes through the network filter chain (Network Filter Chain).
  4. HTTP Processing (if applicable): The HTTP Connection Manager parses the request and extracts headers (HCM).
  5. Routing: The Router determines the upstream cluster based on the request and route configuration (Router).
  6. Upstream Connection: The Cluster Manager establishes a connection to an upstream host (Cluster Manager).
  7. Upstream TLS Handshake (if configured): Envoy performs a TLS handshake with the upstream host (Cluster Manager).
  8. Request Forwarding: Envoy forwards the request to the upstream host.
  9. Upstream Response: The upstream host sends a response to Envoy.
  10. Response Processing: Envoy processes the response, potentially applying filters (HCM, Network Filter Chain).
  11. Response to Client: Envoy sends the response to the client.
  12. Logging: The Access Logger records information about the request and response (Access Logger).

Potential Vulnerability Points:

  • Client Input: The initial client request is a major point of vulnerability, as it can contain malicious data.
  • TLS Handshakes: Both client-side and upstream TLS handshakes are vulnerable to attacks like downgrade attacks and certificate spoofing.
  • Filter Processing: Each filter in the chain is a potential point of vulnerability, as it processes the request and response.
  • Route Configuration: The route configuration determines where traffic is sent, and is therefore a critical security control.
  • Upstream Connections: Connections to upstream hosts are vulnerable to spoofing and interception.
  • Logs: Logs can contain sensitive data and are vulnerable to injection attacks.

4. Conclusion

This deep security analysis has identified numerous potential security vulnerabilities in the Envoy Proxy design and provided specific, actionable mitigation strategies. The key takeaways are:

  • Configuration is Crucial: Envoy's security relies heavily on its configuration. Misconfiguration is a major source of vulnerabilities.
  • Defense in Depth: Multiple layers of security controls are necessary to protect Envoy and the applications it proxies.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Regularly monitor Envoy's logs, metrics, and security advisories to detect and respond to security incidents.
  • Vulnerability Management: Keep Envoy and its dependencies up-to-date to patch vulnerabilities.
  • Kubernetes Security: When deploying Envoy as a sidecar in Kubernetes, leverage Kubernetes security features to enhance Envoy's security.

By implementing the mitigation strategies outlined in this analysis, organizations can significantly improve the security posture of their Envoy deployments and reduce the risk of security incidents. The most important recommendations are summarized below, categorized by priority:

High Priority (Implement Immediately):

  • TLS Hardening: Strictly configure TLS settings (versions, ciphers, mTLS, certificate validation) for both listeners and upstream clusters. Do not rely on defaults.
  • Input Validation: Implement robust input validation using ext_authz or other filters.
  • Rate Limiting: Configure rate limiting to protect against DoS attacks.
  • Route Access Control: Use RBAC or ext_authz to restrict access to routes.
  • Dependency Management: Track and update dependencies regularly. Scan for vulnerabilities.
  • Kubernetes Security Contexts: Run Envoy as non-root, with limited privileges and a read-only root filesystem.
  • Network Policies (Kubernetes): Implement strict network policies to control traffic flow.
  • Log Data Minimization: Configure access logging to avoid logging sensitive data.

Medium Priority (Implement Soon):

  • HTTP Request Smuggling Protection: Enable normalize_path, merge_slashes, and configure path_with_escaped_slashes_action.
  • Header Sanitization: Remove unnecessary headers and add security headers.
  • Filter Ordering: Carefully consider the order of filters in the chain.
  • Wasm Sandboxing: Use Wasm to sandbox untrusted filters.
  • Upstream TLS Verification: Use verify_certificate_spki, verify_certificate_hash, or verify_subject_alt_name for upstream connections.
  • Circuit Breaking and Outlier Detection: Configure these features to improve resilience.
  • Code Signing: Digitally sign Envoy binary artifacts.

Low Priority (Implement as Resources Allow):

  • SNI Validation: Validate SNI values against a whitelist.
  • TLS Tunneling Detection: Implement mechanisms to detect and block TLS tunneling.
  • Reproducible Builds: Strive for reproducible builds.
  • Log Integrity: Implement mechanisms to ensure log integrity.
  • Runtime Security Monitoring (Kubernetes): Use a runtime security tool like Falco.

This prioritized list, combined with the detailed analysis above, provides a comprehensive roadmap for securing Envoy Proxy deployments. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and continuous monitoring and improvement are essential.