Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
159 lines (130 loc) · 20 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

159 lines (130 loc) · 20 KB

Deep Security Analysis of RocksDB Embedded Key-Value Store

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

1.1. Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security evaluation of the RocksDB embedded key-value store, based on the provided security design review document and the underlying architecture of RocksDB. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities and threats associated with RocksDB's components, data flow, and operational characteristics when embedded within an application. The analysis will focus on providing specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies relevant to RocksDB and its embedded usage.

1.2. Scope:

This analysis encompasses the following aspects of RocksDB, as outlined in the security design review:

  • Architecture and Components: MemTable, Immutable MemTable, WAL, SSTables, Block Cache, Bloom Filters, Compaction, Version Set, and their interactions.
  • Data Flow: Write and Read operation flows, focusing on data persistence, caching, and retrieval mechanisms.
  • Key Security Considerations: Access Control, Data at Rest Encryption, Data Integrity, Input Validation, Resource Exhaustion, Logging and Auditing, and Dependency Management.
  • Threat Modeling Considerations: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability threats specific to RocksDB.

The analysis will be limited to the security aspects derivable from the provided design review document and general knowledge of RocksDB's architecture. It will not involve source code review, penetration testing, or dynamic analysis.

1.3. Methodology:

The methodology for this deep analysis will involve the following steps:

  1. Decomposition and Component Analysis: Break down RocksDB into its key components as described in the design review. For each component, analyze its function, data handling, and potential security implications based on the defined security considerations.
  2. Data Flow Security Assessment: Examine the write and read data flows to identify potential vulnerabilities at each stage. Analyze how data is processed, stored, and retrieved, and pinpoint areas where security weaknesses might exist.
  3. Threat Inference and Modeling: Based on the component analysis and data flow assessment, infer potential threats relevant to each security consideration category (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability). Utilize the provided threat modeling considerations as a starting point and expand upon them with specific RocksDB context.
  4. Tailored Mitigation Strategy Formulation: For each identified threat, develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies. These strategies will be directly applicable to RocksDB's configuration, deployment, and integration within an application. General security recommendations will be avoided in favor of RocksDB-specific guidance.
  5. Actionability and Practicality Focus: Ensure that all recommendations are practical and actionable for a development team integrating RocksDB. The focus will be on providing concrete steps and configurations that can be implemented to enhance the security posture of applications using RocksDB.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1. MemTable & Immutable MemTable:

  • Function: In-memory write buffer (MemTable) and its read-only counterpart (Immutable MemTable) before flushing to disk.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Volatility: Data in MemTable is volatile and resides in application memory. In case of application crashes without proper WAL persistence, recent writes in MemTable might be lost, impacting data durability and potentially integrity if not handled correctly by the application's transaction logic.
    • Memory Exposure: If the application process memory is compromised, data residing in MemTable and Immutable MemTable could be exposed. This is a concern for confidentiality if sensitive data is stored.
    • Resource Exhaustion (MemTable Growth): Uncontrolled growth of MemTable due to excessive write operations or misconfiguration can lead to memory exhaustion and application instability (DoS).
  • Threats:
    • Data Loss on Crash (Integrity/Availability): Application crash before MemTable flush leading to loss of recent writes if WAL is not robustly configured.
    • Memory Data Exposure (Confidentiality): Memory dump or process compromise revealing sensitive data in MemTable.
    • MemTable Based DoS (Availability): Unbounded MemTable growth causing memory exhaustion.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust WAL Configuration: Ensure WAL is enabled and configured with appropriate WAL_fsync options (e.g., WAL_FSYNC_ALWAYS for highest durability, balancing performance). Regularly monitor WAL write success and error logs.
    • Memory Protection: Implement OS-level memory protection mechanisms for the application process. Consider using memory encryption features offered by the OS if extremely sensitive data is handled in memory.
    • MemTable Size Limits: Configure appropriate write_buffer_size and max_write_buffer_number options to limit MemTable size and trigger flushes to SSTables, preventing unbounded memory growth. Monitor MemTable usage metrics.
    • Secure Memory Handling in Application: The embedding application should avoid storing highly sensitive data in memory for extended periods if possible. Consider encrypting sensitive data at the application level before writing to RocksDB, even if data-at-rest encryption is enabled, for defense-in-depth.

2.2. WAL (Write Ahead Log):

  • Function: Sequential log on persistent storage recording every write operation before MemTable commit, ensuring durability and atomicity.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Integrity & Durability: WAL is crucial for data integrity and durability. Corruption or loss of WAL data can lead to data loss or database inconsistency upon recovery.
    • Access Control (WAL Files): Unauthorized access to WAL files can allow attackers to read committed write operations, potentially revealing sensitive data or even modifying WAL files to compromise data integrity during recovery.
    • WAL File Storage Security: The storage location and permissions of WAL files are critical. They should be protected from unauthorized access and physical damage.
  • Threats:
    • WAL File Tampering (Integrity): Unauthorized modification of WAL files leading to data corruption or inconsistent recovery.
    • WAL File Disclosure (Confidentiality): Unauthorized reading of WAL files revealing sensitive data.
    • WAL Storage Failure (Availability/Integrity): Disk failure or corruption affecting WAL files leading to data loss or recovery issues.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict File System Permissions: Implement restrictive file system permissions on the directory where WAL files are stored. Only the application user/process running RocksDB should have read and write access.
    • Data-at-Rest Encryption (WAL): Enable RocksDB's data-at-rest encryption feature, which also encrypts WAL files. This protects WAL data confidentiality if storage is compromised.
    • WAL Checksums: RocksDB uses checksums for WAL records. Ensure checksum verification is enabled and monitor for checksum errors in logs, indicating potential data corruption.
    • WAL Storage Redundancy: Consider using RAID or other storage redundancy mechanisms for the disk storing WAL files to mitigate the risk of disk failure.
    • Regular WAL Archival (Operational Security): Implement a secure WAL archival strategy for long-term retention and audit purposes, ensuring archived WAL files are also protected with appropriate access controls and potentially encryption.

2.3. SSTables (Sorted String Tables):

  • Function: On-disk files storing sorted key-value pairs, the primary persistent storage for RocksDB data.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data at Rest Confidentiality: SSTables contain the bulk of the database data. Unauthorized access to SSTable files directly exposes all stored data.
    • Data Integrity (SSTable Corruption): Corruption of SSTable files due to disk errors, hardware failures, or malicious tampering can lead to data loss or application errors.
    • Access Control (SSTable Files): Similar to WAL files, strict access control is crucial for SSTable files to prevent unauthorized access, modification, or deletion.
  • Threats:
    • SSTable File Disclosure (Confidentiality): Unauthorized access and reading of SSTable files revealing all database content.
    • SSTable File Tampering (Integrity): Unauthorized modification or deletion of SSTable files leading to data corruption or loss.
    • SSTable Storage Failure (Availability/Integrity): Disk failure or corruption affecting SSTable files leading to data loss or application unavailability.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict File System Permissions (SSTables): Implement restrictive file system permissions on the directory where SSTable files are stored, mirroring the WAL file permissions.
    • Data-at-Rest Encryption (SSTables): Enable RocksDB's data-at-rest encryption to encrypt SSTable data blocks. This is a primary mitigation for SSTable file disclosure threats.
    • SSTable Checksums: RocksDB uses checksums for SSTable data and metadata blocks. Ensure checksum verification is enabled and monitor for checksum errors in logs.
    • SSTable Storage Redundancy: Consider RAID or similar redundancy for SSTable storage to protect against disk failures.
    • Regular Backups (Operational Security): Implement a robust backup and restore strategy for SSTable files. Securely store backups and regularly test the restore process.

2.4. Block Cache:

  • Function: In-memory cache for frequently accessed data blocks from SSTables, improving read performance.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Volatility & Exposure (Cache Data): Data in Block Cache is in memory and volatile. Similar to MemTable, if application memory is compromised, cached data could be exposed.
    • Cache Poisoning (Integrity/Availability): In theory, if an attacker could manipulate the cache population (though highly unlikely in typical embedded usage), they might be able to poison the cache with incorrect data, leading to data integrity issues or denial of service by forcing cache misses.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Cache Size): Misconfiguration or unbounded cache growth can lead to memory exhaustion and DoS.
  • Threats:
    • Block Cache Data Exposure (Confidentiality): Memory dump or process compromise revealing cached data.
    • Cache Based DoS (Availability): Unbounded Block Cache growth causing memory exhaustion.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Memory Protection (Cache): Same as MemTable, implement OS-level memory protection.
    • Block Cache Size Limits: Configure appropriate block_cache_size and eviction policies (LRU, etc.) to limit cache size and prevent unbounded memory growth. Monitor Block Cache usage metrics.
    • Secure Cache Configuration: Review and securely configure Block Cache parameters. Avoid overly large caches that might increase memory footprint unnecessarily.
    • Limited Security Impact (Embedded Context): In typical embedded usage, the Block Cache's security implications are less critical than persistent storage (WAL, SSTables) as it's a performance optimization and data is already persisted in SSTables. Focus security efforts on persistent storage first.

2.5. Bloom Filters:

  • Function: Probabilistic data structures associated with SSTables, quickly determining if a key is definitely not present, optimizing read performance.
  • Security Implications:
    • Minimal Direct Security Impact: Bloom filters themselves have minimal direct security implications. They are primarily performance optimizations.
    • Potential for DoS (Indirect): If Bloom filters are misconfigured or ineffective, it could lead to increased disk I/O and CPU usage during read operations, potentially contributing to performance degradation or DoS under heavy load.
  • Threats:
    • Ineffective Bloom Filters leading to Performance DoS (Availability): Misconfiguration or inappropriate Bloom filter settings causing performance degradation under load.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Appropriate Bloom Filter Configuration: Configure Bloom filters appropriately based on the expected workload and data characteristics. Tune parameters like bits_per_key to balance false positive rate and performance.
    • Performance Monitoring: Monitor read latency and disk I/O metrics. If performance degradation is observed, review Bloom filter effectiveness and configuration.
    • Indirect Security Consideration: Bloom filters are primarily a performance feature. Security focus should be on core components like access control, encryption, and integrity mechanisms.

2.6. Compaction:

  • Function: Background process merging and compacting SSTables, reclaiming space, and optimizing read performance.
  • Security Implications:
    • Resource Consumption (Compaction): Compaction is resource-intensive (CPU, I/O). If not properly managed, it can consume excessive resources, impacting application performance and potentially leading to DoS if it overwhelms the system.
    • Data Integrity (Compaction Bugs): Bugs in the compaction process could theoretically lead to data corruption or loss during merging and rewriting of SSTables. (Highly unlikely in mature software like RocksDB, but a theoretical consideration).
    • Temporary Data Exposure (During Compaction): During compaction, temporary SSTables might be created. Ensure these temporary files are also protected by the same security measures as regular SSTables (permissions, encryption if enabled).
  • Threats:
    • Compaction Induced DoS (Availability): Uncontrolled or misconfigured compaction consuming excessive resources and impacting application performance.
    • Data Corruption due to Compaction Bugs (Integrity): (Low probability) Bugs in compaction logic leading to data corruption.
    • Temporary File Security (Confidentiality/Integrity): Temporary SSTables created during compaction not being adequately protected.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Compaction Throttling and Scheduling: Configure compaction parameters (e.g., max_background_compactions, target_file_size_base, level0_file_num_compaction_trigger) to control compaction frequency and resource usage. Monitor compaction backlog and resource consumption.
    • Regular RocksDB Updates: Keep RocksDB library updated to benefit from bug fixes and security patches, including potential compaction-related fixes.
    • Temporary File Security: Ensure that temporary directories used by RocksDB for compaction have the same restrictive permissions as the main data directories. If data-at-rest encryption is enabled, temporary files should also be encrypted.
    • Performance Monitoring (Compaction): Monitor compaction performance metrics (e.g., compaction time, CPU/IO usage). Detect and address any performance bottlenecks or excessive resource consumption caused by compaction.

2.7. Version Set:

  • Function: Manages different versions of the database state, tracking SSTables for consistent snapshots and supporting features like snapshots and point-in-time recovery.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Consistency & Integrity: Version Set is critical for maintaining data consistency and enabling features like snapshots. Corruption or manipulation of Version Set metadata could lead to database inconsistency or failure to recover to a consistent state.
    • Access Control (Version Set Metadata): While not directly exposed as files, the integrity of Version Set metadata is crucial. Ensure the underlying storage mechanisms for Version Set metadata are reliable and protected from corruption.
  • Threats:
    • Version Set Corruption (Integrity/Availability): Corruption of Version Set metadata leading to database inconsistency or recovery failures.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Reliable Storage for Metadata: RocksDB stores Version Set metadata within SSTables and WAL. The mitigation strategies for SSTables and WAL (file permissions, encryption, checksums, storage redundancy) indirectly protect Version Set metadata.
    • Regular Integrity Checks (Indirect): RocksDB's internal integrity checks (checksums, WAL replay) help ensure the consistency of the database state managed by the Version Set. Monitor for error logs related to data integrity.
    • Operational Security (Backups & Recovery Testing): Regular backups and thorough testing of the recovery process are essential to validate the integrity of the Version Set and ensure successful database restoration in case of failures.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies Summary

Based on the component-wise analysis, here is a summary of actionable and tailored mitigation strategies for securing RocksDB embedded within an application:

  1. Implement Strict File System Permissions: Restrict access to RocksDB data directories (WAL and SSTable files) to only the application user/process. Use chmod 700 or similar to ensure only the owner has read, write, and execute permissions.
  2. Enable Data-at-Rest Encryption: Utilize RocksDB's built-in data-at-rest encryption feature, choosing a strong encryption algorithm (e.g., AES-CBC or AES-CTR) and managing encryption keys securely using a dedicated Key Management System (KMS) or secure vault. Implement key rotation and access control for encryption keys.
  3. Robust WAL Configuration: Enable WAL and configure WAL_fsync options for desired durability level, balancing performance and data safety. Monitor WAL write operations and error logs. Consider WAL storage redundancy.
  4. Configure MemTable and Block Cache Size Limits: Set appropriate write_buffer_size, max_write_buffer_number, and block_cache_size parameters to prevent unbounded memory growth and resource exhaustion. Monitor memory usage metrics.
  5. Regular RocksDB Updates and Dependency Management: Keep RocksDB library and its dependencies (compression libraries, etc.) updated to the latest stable versions to patch known vulnerabilities. Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) and perform regular vulnerability scanning.
  6. Implement Application-Level Input Validation: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all input data (keys and values) at the application level before writing to RocksDB to prevent injection vulnerabilities and data corruption.
  7. Resource Monitoring and Alerting: Implement monitoring for key RocksDB metrics (memory usage, disk I/O, compaction backlog, query latency, checksum errors). Set up alerts to detect anomalies and potential resource exhaustion or data integrity issues.
  8. Application-Level Audit Logging: Implement audit logging at the application level to track data access and modification operations performed through RocksDB. Securely store and protect audit logs.
  9. Regular Backups and Recovery Testing: Implement a robust backup and restore strategy for RocksDB data (SSTables and WAL). Securely store backups and regularly test the recovery process to ensure data durability and operational readiness.
  10. Secure Configuration Management: Carefully review and validate all RocksDB configuration parameters provided by the application. Follow security best practices for configuration management and avoid insecure configurations.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly enhance the security posture of applications embedding RocksDB, addressing the identified threats and ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data stored within the key-value store. Remember that security is a continuous process, and ongoing monitoring, updates, and threat modeling are essential for maintaining a strong security posture.